Loyalist Dave
Member
It may depend at least a bit on how we define "explosion". As I understand it, "low" explosives burn quickly while "high" explosives undergo chemical changes at a speed greater than sound. Gunpowder - both smokeless and black - are of the "low" type, but can behave similarly to the "high" type if adequately contained.
Correct, gunpowders are labelled "explosive", but in correct terms they deflagrate. They burn. BUT... by the time this was fully understood, the odds of English speaking people switching, and calling the stuff a dee-flag-rant instead of "explosive" was nil.
Black powder when not contained, burns faster than smokeless powder, but is very inefficient, so actually produces lower pressures. But confined can give enough pressure to be a problem. The smokeless powder burns much slower than BP when the smokeless is not compressed, but confine it in a small area like the interior of a rifle cartridge, and you get a different result.
So when you see folks like me doing demonstrations at a historic site, storing their rolled paper musket cartridges in a steel ammo can because the local regs say so, instead of inside a ziplock bag, inside a second ziplock bag, know that this is because the people setting the regs did not understand the behavior of black powder when ignited, and in fact require folks like me to create a bomb, all in the name of "safety". TRUE it is much less likely that a spark would get through the sides of the sealed, ammo can (which is why I don't worry), BUT if something did get through the can and the powder within went up ......
LD