Henry Rifles

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think that would be very unlikely, it was a popular hunting cartridge in its day, but .327 is far superior and has revolvers currently produced for it, something .32-20 can't claim. Like, while .44-40 isn't popular anymore, it's historically accurate and for the CAS crowd, that's what they want, so Italian manufacturers started making revolvers in .44-40 and then Henry was quick to make a model of the 1860 Henry in the caliber, even tho it's not .44 rimfire, it's about as close to historically accurate as possible.

I don't see a demand in the CAS for .32-20 revolvers or rifles. If there was, there'd be some .32-20 chambered guns being made.
I don't know where you get that. Both rifles and pistols have been readily available for years and continue to be.

The .44Colt is the closest thing to the original Henry chambering, not the .44-40. Popularity is the reason why so many more are made in .45Colt than .44Spl, which will feed .44Colt. At least my `66 does.

IMG_7295b.jpg


As usual Drifty, nice pics. Yeah, I understand the reason for chambering the repro Henry's in .45 Colt and .44-40, but these aren't exactly rifles that I feel people are relying solely on factory ammo to shoot, so why they didn't bother with shorter rimmed cases like .45 Schofield or .44 Russian as those would have kept the carrier as short as possible. Like, maybe they'd get more sales, but at least make it an option that people could own something even closer to the originals.
I would say there's nothing there, judging by how few .44Spl's are sold.
 
For quite a while now I have been toying with buying another rifle in .308. I was seriously considering a bolt action with a detachable magazine but I have never been a fan of bolt guns. Operating a bolt just seems awkward to me when firing and reloading.
I would love to put my hands on a Henry Long Ranger in .308, but I have yet to actually see one in a gun store.
I have decided that until I do I have put off my quest for buying a rifle in .308.

I have a feeling that once I do handle a Henry Long Ranger I will be adding that to my short list of Henry’s that I own. :cool:
I got to handle one and really liked it. Probably should've bought it on the spot because I haven't seen another since.
 
I had wanted to buy my lefty (handed) wife a rifle. I inquired of Henry if they made any left handed rifles. I got a slightly less than courteous answer from them. See for yourselves:
-----------------------------------------

From: "Henry Customer Service"
To: "grayrock...
Sent: Wednesday December 2 2020 2:56:47PM
Subject: Response from Henry Repeating Arms for Case
Hi G...,

Thank you for your interest in Henry rifles.

Left- and right-handed shooters can use any Henry lever-action, pump, single shot, or semi-automatic rifles without any issues. For this reason, we do not make special left- or right-handed rifles.
Jeff
Technical Customer Service Rep.


--------------- Original Message ---------------
From: [grayrock
Sent: 12/3/2020 9:06 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: Response from Henry Repeating Arms for Case #

"Left- and right-handed shooters can use any Henry lever-action, pump, single shot, or semi-automatic rifles without any issues." That is not entirely correct. The rimfire lever actions eject the empty cases to the right. A left handed individual (being my wife, the intended gift recipient) would have the empties crossing her field of vision when aiming. A right handed shooter would not encounter that distraction. But thank you for your information.

--------------- Original Message ---------------
From: "Henry Customer Service"
To: "grayrock...
Sent: Wednesday December 2 2020 2:56:47PM
Subject: Response from Henry Repeating Arms for Case

Actually, it is precisely correct. Ejected shells will cause no more 'distraction' than the act of cycling the action would cause to any shooter.
Besides, if your eye is lined up on the sights, and the shell flies out of the ejection port low and away from the line-of-sight, it may not be noticed at all.
I speak from experience because I am a lefty shooter also.

Jeff
Technical Customer Service Rep.


View attachment 960510


(I added the color emphasis.)


Do any of you shoot lefthanded? I am looking at this from a righthanded person's point of view and thought it would be distracting. Perhaps I am wrong. What are your experiences, you left handed shooters?

So, as a lefty, I have a bit of interest in Henry's entire lineup of products even if I do not necessarily want all of them. The CSR is right in that lefties can use them as well as righties but the rifles themselves are in no way fully ambidextrous. The ejection port on the side just does not allow it. However, lefties can use them just fine with no problems related to the spent casing crossing your field of vision. I never notice it as my vision is focused downrange and even if I watch for it out of my peripherals, it is only a blur.

As an example, I am a big fan of one of the only truly ambidextrous guns on the market, the Browning BPS. This is the ideal solution that is not very practical for rifles. One of the only closely common examples I can think of is the Browning SA-22 which is also bottom ejecting but the safety is non-ambidextrous.

I prefer lever, pump, and single shot rifles for my leftiness reasons. Basically anything but bolt actions though I do have one. I don't like lefty specific guns generally, but I do own a Ruger American Ranch in lefty.

As a lefty and a gun owner, you just have to deal with it. I dealt with it by disregarding nearly all bolt actions. Levers, pumps, and single shots are just fine though.
 
I don't know where you get that. Both rifles and pistols have been readily available for years and continue to be.

You know I'm a nit picker and am going to call you on that.

All three of these firearms are chambered for 32-20. The Winchester Model 1892 left the factory in 1911, The S&W 32-20 Hand Ejector left the factory in 1916, and the Colt Police Positive Special left the factory in 1926.

pl00dO3lj.jpg




Just checked the Uberti, Smith and Wesson, Colt, Ruger, and Winchester web pages. None of them are chambering anything for 32-20. 32 H+R Magnum but no 32-20s.



The .44Colt is the closest thing to the original Henry chambering, not the .44-40. Popularity is the reason why so many more are made in .45Colt than .44Spl, which will feed .44Colt. At least my `66 does.

Again, I'm going to be a pain in the butt. Left to right in this photo the cartridges are 44-40. 44 Henry Rimfire, 44 S&W American, 44 Russian, 44 Colt, 44 Special, and 45 Colt. I always say that back in Black Powder days the relative size of a cartridge was a pretty good indicator of its relative power, because they were all completely filled with Black Powder. Clearly, the 44 Russian is closer in size to the 44 Henry than the 44 Colt. I'm just saying that 44 Russian is closer to the original 44 Henry round than any other cartridges. Not that anybody is going to chamber a rifle for it.

pooItfLhj.jpg
 
The Uberti website does not list everything they make for distributors other than Stoeger. I double checked Cimarron and Dixie Gun Works before posting.

My .44Colt comment was with the thought that it was produced in both rimfire and centerfire versions. Colt Open Tops and cartridge conversions once offered in .44 rimfire and now offered as replicas in .44Colt centerfire. The .44Russian is a S&W cartridge with no connection to rimfires or rifles. The case can be made for either but both the .44Colt and .44Russian are closer to the original .44 Henry rimfire than the .44-40.
 
I was about to say that I own a Uberti S. A. A. 1873 I got from Dixie Gun Works in .32-20, and a Miroku made Winchester in .32-20, both back about five years ago.

Has Uberti stopped making .32-20 guns? :thumbdown:
 
As a lefty and a gun owner, you just have to deal with it. I dealt with it by disregarding nearly all bolt actions. Levers, pumps, and single shots are just fine though.
Thanks for that. She has "dealt with" the right-centric world her whole life. She has even mastered right handed scissors. She will be able to grit her teeth and power through the eccentricities of a lever action, I am sure. Henry "American Beauty" here I come!
 
I don't know where you get that. Both rifles and pistols have been readily available for years and continue to be

The .44Colt is the closest thing to the original Henry chambering, not the .44-40. Popularity is the reason why so many more are made in .45Colt than .44Spl, which will feed .44Colt. At least my `66 does.

I would say there's nothing there, judging by how few .44Spl's are sold.

Something tells me a .44 Colt lever action isn't going to sell all that well.

As to a .44 Spl lever action, I'm not saying that specific chambering would sell, I'm saying that the concept of a lever action that can run a very short cartridge, like a .38 Short Colt or a .45 Cowboy Special or .45 ACP/Super, would interest people. When we're talking increasing the capacity of a 20 inch .357 Mag lever action from 10 rds to 17 rds when using .38 Short Colt or a 20 inch .45 Colt from 10 rds to 15 rds when using .45 Cowboy Spl/ACP/Super, that's significant.

Check my thread on Henry rifles for 2021 and what people would like and quite a few would like a 9mm lever action. I'm sure a lot of that interest is more for the cheap ammo than the increased tube capacity, but I'm sure that increased capacity would also interest people.

For the rimmed cartridges that headspace off the rim this doesn't require different barrels be made, the .357/.44 Mag and .45 Colt barrels they currently make can be used, it's different internal parts. IDK what all internal parts would need to be made, I assume it's all got to do with the carrier, which isn't all that difficult to make a different carrier specific to a cartridge with a shorter length.

My argument is, for the rimmed cartridges, it's not going to require a ton of tooling up to do this. The rimless cartridges, yeah, more than likely, but those will have a high demand do to the popularity of 9mm and .45 ACP. You're saying there's not enough interest and I think that depends. Driftwood says there is some interest in CAS shooting for shorter cartridges and increased capacities. It all depends on how much demand is there and I think there's enough to justify the low start up costs in the manufacturing associated with it.
 
Another thing I see in the Henry site is the single shot rifled slug gun in 12 ga only.

I feel Henry may be a little out of touch with people who are buying new slug guns. They should have come out with 20 ga as their primary offering and 12 could be the tag along that comes later as I’m sure will be the case next year when they release it in 20 ga.

These single shots are so affordable right now. Henry could really have something I think if they get into the switch barrels.
 
@Grayrock

I'm a lefty. I shoot my Golden Boy and Big Boy (.357) rifles left handed. I've never even noticed the casings as they ejected.
I also shoot my AR's left handed, and i've never had a problem with ejected cases from them either.
Obviously, YMMV, IANAL, no holiday inns were slept in. :D

I will agree though, that the letter from Jeff was a bit... terse. Hopefully he was just having a bad day.
 
Something tells me a .44 Colt lever action isn't going to sell all that well.

As to a .44 Spl lever action, I'm not saying that specific chambering would sell, I'm saying that the concept of a lever action that can run a very short cartridge, like a .38 Short Colt or a .45 Cowboy Special or .45 ACP/Super, would interest people. When we're talking increasing the capacity of a 20 inch .357 Mag lever action from 10 rds to 17 rds when using .38 Short Colt or a 20 inch .45 Colt from 10 rds to 15 rds when using .45 Cowboy Spl/ACP/Super, that's significant.

Check my thread on Henry rifles for 2021 and what people would like and quite a few would like a 9mm lever action. I'm sure a lot of that interest is more for the cheap ammo than the increased tube capacity, but I'm sure that increased capacity would also interest people.

For the rimmed cartridges that headspace off the rim this doesn't require different barrels be made, the .357/.44 Mag and .45 Colt barrels they currently make can be used, it's different internal parts. IDK what all internal parts would need to be made, I assume it's all got to do with the carrier, which isn't all that difficult to make a different carrier specific to a cartridge with a shorter length.

My argument is, for the rimmed cartridges, it's not going to require a ton of tooling up to do this. The rimless cartridges, yeah, more than likely, but those will have a high demand do to the popularity of 9mm and .45 ACP. You're saying there's not enough interest and I think that depends. Driftwood says there is some interest in CAS shooting for shorter cartridges and increased capacities. It all depends on how much demand is there and I think there's enough to justify the low start up costs in the manufacturing associated with it.
But the .44Russian will??? There are already .44Spl's and the reason you don't see them is that people don't buy them. They typically buy .357's and .45Colt's. Those that buy .357's don't care about short, they want cheap. Those that buy .45Colt's, want that big fat long case. The fact that it's mostly empty is irrelevant.

I don't want a levergun in 9mm, .40S&W, 10mm or .45ACP. My objection isn't philosophical but due to the fact that I do not want a taper crimped cartridge riding in a tubular magazine.
 
If someone produced a lever action in .45 Auto or 9x19... I daresay, I'd buy one.
 
But the .44Russian will??? There are already .44Spl's and the reason you don't see them is that people don't buy them. They typically buy .357's and .45Colt's. Those that buy .357's don't care about short, they want cheap. Those that buy .45Colt's, want that big fat long case. The fact that it's mostly empty is irrelevant.

I don't want a levergun in 9mm, .40S&W, 10mm or .45ACP. My objection isn't philosophical but due to the fact that I do not want a taper crimped cartridge riding in a tubular magazine.
I told you it's not all about .44 Russian, forget about .44 Russian, I brought up .44 Russian because it's a short cartridge, I used it as an example that other people who were reading my post would understand because I'm willing to bet more people are familiar with .44 Russian than .38 Short Colt or .45 Cowboy Special.

And how do you know that people who buy .357 or .45 Colt lever actions have no interest in shorter cartridges? Have you asked them? Do they even know about the shorter cartridges and their capabilities? That they could be used in lever actions with the appropriate parts necessary to make their functioning possible?

I don't think the lack of interest isn't stemming from lack of interest, it's lack of information, lack of the industry to provide the consumer with a lever action capable of cycling the short cases.

You may not want a lever action with a taper crimped cartridge, but that doesn't mean other's don't.
 
If someone produced a lever action in .45 Auto or 9x19... I daresay, I'd buy one.

Eh.... nevermind. First time that levergun ripped a bullet from the case due to recoil and tied the action up; I'd be a very unhappy camper.
 
I own a Golden Boy 22lr. Bought it this year, actually. Its a right nice gun, a bit heavy, but decently accurate. My Marlin 39A will out shoot it though. I've yet to drag mine through the woods, but fully intend to when deer season is over and we turn the cur dogs loose.

Mac
 
The Uberti website does not list everything they make for distributors other than Stoeger. I double checked Cimarron and Dixie Gun Works before posting.

Yup. Just checked. Both Cimarron and Dixie Gunworks are listing revolvers chambered for 32-20. Did not wade through all the items on the Taylors site.

So I stand corrected about nothing being chambered for 32-20 anymore.
 
You may not want a lever action with a taper crimped cartridge, but that doesn't mean other's don't.
You can't want all you want, that doesn't mean it will work.


Yup. Just checked. Both Cimarron and Dixie Gunworks are listing revolvers chambered for 32-20. Did not wade through all the items on the Taylors site.

So I stand corrected about nothing being chambered for 32-20 anymore.
My favorite is the Browning 53 but those are long out of print. Glad I got mine when I did. For me the 1873 is just too heavy in .32-20.
 
My argument is, for the rimmed cartridges, it's not going to require a ton of tooling up to do this. The rimless cartridges, yeah, more than likely, but those will have a high demand do to the popularity of 9mm and .45 ACP. You're saying there's not enough interest and I think that depends. Driftwood says there is some interest in CAS shooting for shorter cartridges and increased capacities. It all depends on how much demand is there and I think there's enough to justify the low start up costs in the manufacturing associated with it.

I told you it's not all about .44 Russian, forget about .44 Russian, I brought up .44 Russian because it's a short cartridge, I used it as an example that other people who were reading my post would understand because I'm willing to bet more people are familiar with .44 Russian than .38 Short Colt or .45 Cowboy Special.

Howdy Again

The toggle link rifles, such as the 1860 Henry, the Winchester Model 1866, and the Winchester Model 1873 and their modern replicas do not have a cartridge stop on the carrier. The carriers in a toggle link rifle rise straight up and down like an elevator. The carrier rides in a squared off opening in the frame called the mortise. The mortise extends completely through the frame. The cartridge on the carrier is presented straight in line to the chamber, much like a torpedo on a submarine being shoved into a torpedo tube. The Over All Length of the cartridge on the carrier determines how much of the next cartridge in the magazine will be able to protrude onto the carrier. This is a photo of the carrier on my Uberti replica Winchester Model 1873. The carrier is in its lower position. Notice the rim of the next cartridge in the magazine is being pressed by the magazine spring against the bullet of the round on the carrier. This rifle happens to be chambered for 44-40, but the same will be true of a toggle link rifle chambered for 45 Colt, 357 Magnum, or any other cartridge one cares to name. As I said, there is no cartridge stop on the carrier. When the carrier rides down to accept a new cartridge out of the magazine, the magazine spring thrusts a round into the carrier, not much different than with a tilting carrier such as on a Marlin or the later Winchester models. The round stops against the rear face of the mortise in the frame. So the rear face of the mortise in the frame functions as a cartridge stop. The key here is, if the round on the carrier is too short, too much of the next round in the magazine will protrude into the space of the carrier and prevent the carrier from rising, jamming the rifle. There is a bevel on the lower surface of the hollow in the carrier which will shove the round protruding out of the magazine back into the magazine so the carrier can rise all the way, but if too much of the next round protrudes out of the magazine the bevel will not pick it up and the carrier will jam as it tries to rise. So all that is my way of saying that the Over All Length of the cartridge is critical in making a Toggle Link rifle feed and function. As can be seen in this photo, the round on the carrier is about 1 rim thickness (about .060) shorter than the entire length of the carrier. Much shorter and the carrier will jam as it tries to rise.

pnWPCuS5j.jpg




Here is a what the carrier on my Henry looks like when fully raised to feed a round into the chamber.

po4VGHohj.jpg




Here is the underside of the frame, showing the carrier in its mortise in the frame. This is the normal position of the carrier, flush with the bottom of the frame.

po95ywM5j.jpg




A view down into the Henry carrier, similar to the view of the 1873 carrier above. Again, this rifle is also chambered for 44-40, and the cartridge on the carrier is backed up against the rear face of the mortise. A little bit less than the thickness of the next round in the chamber is protruding out of the magazine.

poBDwpnOj.jpg




So. Any round shorter than a standard 45 Colt or 44-40 (they both have a very similar OAL) will cause the carrier to jam as it tries to rise to feed a fresh round into the chamber. I know that 45 Colt and 44-40 Uberti Henry rifles have the same frame and carrier, the barrel and its chambering are different. I do not know how Uberti has addressed this with toggle link rifles chambered for 44 Special, as can be seen in one of my photos above, 44 Special is considerably shorter than 45 colt or 44-40. Perhaps the bevel on the carrier has been lengthened to shove a cartridge protruding further out of the magazine back in so the carrier can rise. I really do not know as I have never handled a toggle link rifle chambered for 44 Special. I do strongly suspect that a 44 Special Henry will use the same frame as a 44-40 or 45 Colt Henry, I suspect the carrier may be slightly different. I do know that modern toggle link rifles chambered for 357 Magnum have a much narrower opening in the carrier to allow for the much narrower cartridge.

There is a limit of how much the bevel on the carrier of a Toggle Link rifle can be extended. I don't know exactly how much, but there is a limit, so extremely short cartridges simply will not feed properly in one of these rifles.

That is why Happy Trails came up with his modified carrier for extremely short cartridges such as 45 Cowboy Special. That carrier has the added spring loaded, pivoted cartridge stop to prevent a round from being shoved back onto the carrier. Other than that it is a standard carrier. There is probably a no mans land between what can be accomplished with a longer bevel and a spring loaded cartridge stop. There has to be enough real estate in the carrier to allow for the spring loaded cartridge stop.

https://www.thesmithshop.com/cbs45.html


My objection isn't philosophical but due to the fact that I do not want a taper crimped cartridge riding in a tubular magazine.

I can tell you this. With any rifle with a tubular magazine it is not recoil that sets bullets back in the cartridge case. If recoil was able to move a bullet, the bullet would jump forward, not back. With any rifle with a tubular magazine it is the slamming action of the column of cartridges being violently shoved back by the magazine spring and follower that tends to telescope bullets into a case. I can also tell you that with the 44-40 cartridge, because of its very, very thin brass at the case mouth, at best the crimp has a very tenuous hold on a bullet. I make up dummy 44-00 rounds without powder or primer, to check the feed and function of my rifles all the time. I can tell you for a fact that if I run these rounds through a rifle with a tubular magazine much more than twice, the bullets will be set back into the case from the slamming action of the magazine spring and follower. My 44-40 rounds are filled with Black Powder, so in essence there is a Black Powder 'plug' preventing the bullets from telescoping into the case. If my rounds were loaded with Smokeless, I might have a problem with that. Most guys who shoot 44-40 in one of these rifles may not have a problem, it has been a long time since I loaded any Smokeless 44-40 rounds, when I first started in CAS I was shooting Smokeless in a Winchester Model 1892 and I don't recall any problem. 45 Colt by its nature makes a much firmer crimp than 44-40 or 38-40, because the brass is much thicker at the case mouth and can mechanically dig into a lead bullet.

I have no idea if a round with a tapered crimp, such as most semi-automatic rounds have, would suffer set back in a tubular magazine or not.

Anyway, it is all pie in the sky. Yes, there is some interest in shorter cartridges in toggle link rifles in CAS, but not a whole lot.
 
Last edited:
Howdy Again

The toggle link rifles, such as the 1860 Henry, the Winchester Model 1866, and the Winchester Model 1873 and their modern replicas do not have a cartridge stop on the carrier. The carriers in a toggle link rifle rise straight up and down like an elevator. The carrier rides in a squared off opening in the frame called the mortise. The mortise extends completely through the frame. The cartridge on the carrier is presented straight in line to the chamber, much like a torpedo on a submarine being shoved into a torpedo tube. The Over All Length of the cartridge on the carrier determines how much of the next cartridge in the magazine will be able to protrude onto the carrier. This is a photo of the carrier on my Uberti replica Winchester Model 1873. The carrier is in its lower position. Notice the rim of the next cartridge in the magazine is being pressed by the magazine spring against the bullet of the round on the carrier. This rifle happens to be chambered for 44-40, but the same will be true of a toggle link rifle chambered for 45 Colt, 357 Magnum, or any other cartridge one cares to name. As I said, there is no cartridge stop on the carrier. When the carrier rides down to accept a new cartridge out of the magazine, the magazine spring thrusts a round into the carrier, not much different than with a tilting carrier such as on a Marlin or the later Winchester models. The round stops against the rear face of the mortise in the frame. So the rear face of the mortise in the frame functions as a cartridge stop. The key here is, if the round on the carrier is too short, too much of the next round in the magazine will protrude into the space of the carrier and prevent the carrier from rising, jamming the rifle. There is a bevel on the lower surface of the hollow in the carrier which will shove the round protruding out of the magazine back into the magazine so the carrier can rise all the way, but if too much of the next round protrudes out of the magazine the bevel will not pick it up and the carrier will jam as it tries to rise. So all that is my way of saying that the Over All Length of the cartridge is critical in making a Toggle Link rifle feed and function. As can be seen in this photo, the round on the carrier is about 1 rim thickness (about .060) shorter than the entire length of the carrier. Much shorter and the carrier will jam as it tries to rise.

View attachment 961111




Here is a what the carrier on my Henry looks like when fully raised to feed a round into the chamber.

View attachment 961112




Here is the underside of the frame, showing the carrier in its mortise in the frame. This is the normal position of the carrier, flush with the bottom of the frame.

View attachment 961113




A view down into the Henry carrier, similar to the view of the 1873 carrier above. Again, this rifle is also chambered for 44-40, and the cartridge on the carrier is backed up against the rear face of the mortise. A little bit less than the thickness of the next round in the chamber is protruding out of the magazine.

View attachment 961114




So. Any round shorter than a standard 45 Colt or 44-40 (they both have a very similar OAL) will cause the carrier to jam as it tries to rise to feed a fresh round into the chamber. I know that 45 Colt and 44-40 Uberti Henry rifles have the same frame and carrier, the barrel and its chambering are different. I do not know how Uberti has addressed this with toggle link rifles chambered for 44 Special, as can be seen in one of my photos above, 44 Special is considerably shorter than 45 colt or 44-40. Perhaps the bevel on the carrier has been lengthened to shove a cartridge protruding further out of the magazine back in so the carrier can rise. I really do not know as I have never handled a toggle link rifle chambered for 44 Special. I do strongly suspect that a 44 Special Henry will use the same frame as a 44-40 or 45 Colt Henry, I suspect the carrier may be slightly different. I do know that modern toggle link rifles chambered for 357 Magnum have a much narrower opening in the carrier to allow for the much narrower cartridge.

There is a limit of how much the bevel on the carrier of a Toggle Link rifle can be extended. I don't know exactly how much, but there is a limit, so extremely short cartridges simply will not feed properly in one of these rifles.

That is why Happy Trails came up with his modified carrier for extremely short cartridges such as 45 Cowboy Special. That carrier has the added spring loaded, pivoted cartridge stop to prevent a round from being shoved back onto the carrier. Other than that it is a standard carrier. There is probably a no mans land between what can be accomplished with a longer bevel and a spring loaded cartridge stop. There has to be enough real estate in the carrier to allow for the spring loaded cartridge stop.

https://www.thesmithshop.com/cbs45.html




I can tell you this. With any rifle with a tubular magazine it is not recoil that sets bullets back in the cartridge case. If recoil was able to move a bullet, the bullet would jump forward, not back. With any rifle with a tubular magazine it is the slamming action of the column of cartridges being violently shoved back by the magazine spring and follower that tends to telescope bullets into a case. I can also tell you that with the 44-40 cartridge, because of its very, very thin brass at the case mouth, at best the crimp has a very tenuous hold on a bullet. I make up dummy 44-00 rounds without powder or primer, to check the feed and function of my rifles all the time. I can tell you for a fact that if I run these rounds through a rifle with a tubular magazine much more than twice, the bullets will be set back into the case from the slamming action of the magazine spring and follower. My 44-40 rounds are filled with Black Powder, so in essence there is a Black Powder 'plug' preventing the bullets from telescoping into the case. If my rounds were loaded with Smokeless, I might have a problem with that. Most guys who shoot 44-40 in one of these rifles may not have a problem, it has been a long time since I loaded any Smokeless 44-40 rounds, when I first started in CAS I was shooting Smokeless in a Winchester Model 1892 and I don't recall any problem. 45 Colt by its nature makes a much firmer crimp than 44-40 or 38-40, because the brass is much thicker at the case mouth and can mechanically dig into a lead bullet.

I have no idea if a round with a tapered crimp, such as most semi-automatic rounds have, would suffer set back in a tubular magazine or not.

Anyway, it is all pie in the sky. Yes, there is some interest in shorter cartridges in toggle link rifles in CAS, but not a whole lot.
So, is it impossible for Henry to take one of their Big Boy .357 or .45 Colt rifles to make them run .38 Short and .45 Cowboy Spl by changing the carrier? Would it require them to completely redesign the entire rifle to get to work?

My belief is if some guy in his garage down in Warwick can get the carrier of a toggle link lever action to work with .45 Cowboy Spl, then a production company like Henry should be able to do the same thing and not require millions of dollars designing an entirely new action.
 
Howdy Again

Happy Trails is hardly some guy in his garage. Before he retired he was a well known Cowboy Action Shooting gunsmith. He is so clever that he was able to redesign the way S&W Top Break revolvers rotate their cylinders. With a S&W Top Break if the trigger is prevented from popping forward when the hammer is cocked, the hand will jam and the hammer cannot be cocked. This prevents slip hammering or fanning, which can be easily done with a Colt style lockwork. I can't tell you how many times I have accidentally had my finger on the trigger of one of my antique Smiths and it reminded me to take my finger off the trigger so I could cock the hammer. Happy Trails redesigned the lockwork for both the modern replicas and the originals so the hammer could be cocked even if the trigger was held back. I did not have Hap modify my antiques, but I know several guys who did have him modify their modern replicas.

Anyway, Hap came up with the modification to the toggle link carriers in conjunction with Adirondack Jack, who created the 45 Cowboy Special brass. Jack sent a drawing on the back of an envelope to Hap, and he modified a carrier on his miller. After it was perfected he contracted with a machine shop to produce them for him to sell on his website.

I cannot speak for the Henry Big Boy, I do not own one and never will. I understand the mechanism of a Henry is basically the same as the mechanism of a Marlin Model 1894. I do have a few of those.

pnWy49U9j.jpg




Marlins have a tilting carrier, not much different than a Winchester Model 1892 carrier, except Marlins and Henry Big Boys eject to the side. Here is a photo of a 44-40 round being fed into the chamber of an antique Marlin Model 1894. I suspect it would not be very difficult to reconfigure a Marlin carrier to accept a shorter cartridge such as the 45 Cowboy Special. If so it would probably be fairly simple to do the same with a Henry Big Boy.

pnJI3fGmj.jpg




However I think you are barking up the wrong tree with the 38 Short Colt. The 38 Short Colt had a heeled bullet that required a special die to crimp the bullet into the case.

The only place I am aware of to obtain a mold and crimp die for a heeled bullet for 38 Short Colt is Old West Bullet Molds.

I doubt many prospective owners would be interested in reloading such an unusual cartridge.

https://oldwestbulletmoulds.com/shop/ols/products/38-colt-mould-and-crimp-die-set

Starline does make brass for 38 Short Colt.
 
C.E. (Ed) Harris had Marlin 94s (modern reissue) converted to .45 ACP. It looked like a lot of work.

An oddity of USPSA rules has made a place for .38 Short Colt in 8 shot revolvers. The short case ejects better.
The racegunners are not loading heel bullets, they just treat .38 SC brass like a reduced .38 Special and load it to Minor power factor. Which must be +P+ in that little case.
A real revolver cartridge has advantages over 9mm in an 8 shooter. I think some of the guys are even using .38 SC brass in their 9mm cylinders after realizing that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top