ontarget
Member
I would steer away from the ten shot 617s too.
Please explain why.
I was looking at one last week. Is there an inherent problem I should consider? I was actually going to see if it was still there today.
I would steer away from the ten shot 617s too.
Please explain why.
I was looking at one last week. Is there an inherent problem I should consider? I was actually going to see if it was still there today.
you may want to watch a video i made. i wish i saw similar videos before i bought mine. they did eventually fix it ( crossing fingers) but so far only have 300 plus rounds since the fix.Please explain why.
I was looking at one last week. Is there an inherent problem I should consider? I was actually going to see if it was still there today.
What do you consider "poor" accuracy? I'm shooting at steel plates 10 yards away, I'm not looking to win bullseye competitions.
The larger 22lr revolvers tend to have better triggers. J-frames usually have stiffer triggers than K-frames, and rimfire tends to have stiffer triggers than centerfire.
I had a Taurus .22 revolver about 15 years ago. It was junk. Sent it back to Taurus twice for repair, but it still was still bad. Don't know about the 942, but I would not buy another Taurus .22 revolver.
Well explained, I think as well as anyone could put it in plain English. Thanks for taking that time to write your reply.That is a very good question because it is thought provoking and not easy to answer.
The first thing that came to mind was Supreme Court Justice Potter Stewart’s definition of pornography: "It may not be easy to define but I know it when I see it." But as entertaining as that is, it is not very helpful.
I want the gun and ammo combination to shoot accurately enough to allow me to call my shots. I want ME to be the limiting factor in determining group sizes. I will have good days and bad days and my group size can vary widely, but I want it to be my shakiness that causes big groups, not inherent problems with the gun and or ammo.
So with that criteria as background, assume I am shooting a DA revolver over a rest at 15 yards. If the group is bigger than a quarter, I am going to experiment with different brands of ammunition. If I can't find a brand of ammo that provides quarter sized groups, the gun is a candidate for being sold or traded away. That is my rule of thumb, based on my physical and eyesight limitations and my experience on the range. It need not be yours.
Think about this: When you are shooting at a steel plate, you want to hit it. (Otherwise, why are you shooting at it?). If your groups are large, it makes the effective target size smaller, more difficult to hit. For example, let's say your groups are 5 inches in diameter. That means if your sights get closer than 2.5" inches to the edge of your target, you may miss. In other words, your effective target size is not the full plate, it is the area inside a 2.5" margin all around the plate. A more accurate gun increases the number of hits by expanding the usable effective target size.
You can probably find an inexpensive revolver that you can be happy with. I stack the odds in my favor by avoiding really cheap guns, rather than rolling the dice.
Is it me, or do those chambers look rough?I picked up a Charter Arms Pathfinder back in November. My first trip to the range didn’t go so good. I fired a few brands of high velocity and all got stuck in the cylinder, and we’re very hard to eject. I had no problem with CCI Standard Velocity ammo.
I just need to get off my butt and send it back to Charter Arms to have the cylinder fixed.
View attachment 1063010 View attachment 1063011 View attachment 1063012
They're roughIs it me, or do those chambers look rough?
Or maybe they're just dirty , what do I know.
The chambers are dirty. The problem is the back of the chambers are out of spec. You can see in the pic of the eight cases, one from each chamber, has marks, and bulging just above the rim.Is it me, or do those chambers look rough?
Or maybe they're just dirty , what do I know.
I picked up a Charter Arms Pathfinder back in November. My first trip to the range didn’t go so good. I fired a few brands of high velocity and all got stuck in the cylinder, and we’re very hard to eject. I had no problem with CCI Standard Velocity ammo.
I just need to get off my butt and send it back to Charter Arms to have the cylinder fixed.
View attachment 1063010 View attachment 1063011 View attachment 1063012
You could save a lot of money by holding the cartridges in your hand and then just tossing them down range.
S&W... that's one I've thought of and I'm not normally a S&W guy, but I have the feeling their DA triggers won't be bad, what holds me back is the price and current QC.
I would steer away from the ten shot 617s too. The older six shot versions are better.
The chambers are dirty. The problem is the back of the chambers are out of spec. You can see in the pic of the eight cases, one from each chamber, has marks, and bulging just above the rim.
Mine had a great DA trigger, and I improved it even more with some DIY trigger work.
My 10 shooter has been a dream!
I found the perfect revolver for you.
View attachment 1064731
It's been two years, the Taurus 942 is unobtainable outside of Gougebroker and I'm not willing to pay the $550 OTD prices for them, so I'm looking at alternatives for a DA .22 revolver.
6 or 8 shot?I've been on the same track, also wanted the 942 or a Pathfinder Lite. Finally found a Pathfinder Lite after all this time, and it's a Lavender Lady model. Took a few hours of contemplation before I hit the buy button. It should be here by Friday, will report back after a range trip.
I've been on the same track, also wanted the 942 or a Pathfinder Lite. Finally found a Pathfinder Lite after all this time, and it's a Lavender Lady model. Took a few hours of contemplation before I hit the buy button. It should be here by Friday, will report back after a range trip.