No Bs Opinions on Taurus Revolvers!

Status
Not open for further replies.
MCgunner said:
At least there are first rate guns made in America. That's in contrast to motor vehicles. We've lost any sort of claim to the best motor vehicles in the world. Not sure why, but American companies just don't seem to have the engineering capacity of the Euro or Japanese companies. Heck, they have to use marketing ploys to get sales and even then when gas goes up, SUV and truck sales plummet and since Detroit seems incapable of building a first rate economy car, they lose their shirts. Well, guess what? Gas ain't gettin' any cheaper! It's going to come down to improve or die, I reckon, for some former giants like GM.

But, in firearms we still make some GREAT guns! We still have Ruger and Smith and Wesson! We have some lesser companies cranking out first rate products like Kel Tec, Springfield Armory, Para Ordinance, Kimber, etc. We ain't hurtin' for good guns that are American made. That said, I don't care where it comes from if I want it. I've owned Brazilian stuff, have two Tauri and three Rossis. Other than two SKSs and some war surplus stuff, I think that's the only non-American guns I have, though. I like American rifles, in particular. Howa, a Japanese firm, makes a good rifle, but in no way is it superior. I own American shotguns. You can buy some nice stuff from the likes of Beretta and some of the other European companies, but hands down as working shotguns I like my Mossberg and Winchester 1400 quality for the money.

Funny about the world economy we live in, back in the 80s I read that the most vaunted of Harley Davidson attributes being "made in America", 70 percent of the sportster's parts were Japanese. In 1984 Honda built the first of their production facilities in the US to build Gold Wings. Much of the bike's parts were US sourced and the Wing, from 84, was effectively an American made motorcycle, at least as much so as the Sportster!:D Go figure.

Which is one reason I ride a 1949 Harley.:neener:
Biker
 
I own a Taurus Tracker 627 7 shot 357mag. It has been a great gun. Some if the issues that I have had (keep in mind it is all personal preference) are:

1) Trigger was gritty when I first got it. I took the cover off and spray it out with CLP and the grittiness when away.

2) The Ribber grip was just a tad too small for me. I have large hands and switched over to a Hogue grip and the problem when away, though I wish Hogue made a square butt grip.

3) The porting is a pain in the a** to clean.

4) While the trigger was smooth and crisp, it was a little heavy. I installed wolf springs and it lightened up the trigger and maintained the same feel.

All in all, I think Taurus makes a good revolver. Fit and finish are great, and the prices can’t be beat. I like mine enough that the next two guns to get are a PT145 Mil Pro and a Model 85.
 
Went to the range once when they were having a Taurus "range day". Reps from Taurus were there with at least one of about everything they make, and you could shoot whatever you wanted, and they even provided the ammunition.

I thought "great, now I can try these out and maybe pick up a nice revolver" (they were on sale in that shop).

I picked up one of their basic .357 magnum, 6 inch bbl model. Fired one shot and the thing jammed tight. Cylinder would not turn, trigger was jammed etc. The rep took it and said it was just dirty - he cleaned it, loaded it back up, then handed it back to me. Yep, you guessed it -- one shot and it jammed tight again.

OK, maybe just a fluke. Picked up a .45 ACP and tried it. Fired two shots, and then, no BANG. No primer strike at all. Broken firing pin.

So, ever since then, I have not been in the least bit inclined to even think about purchasing a Taurus anything.
 
Back in my early days of guns, I picked up a new Model 66 4 inch. I shot it for all of about 2 boxes of ammo and decided I didnt like revolvers, so I sold it. Now, I regret it.

I picked up a used 605 a couple months ago and took her out. Shoots VERY accurately and has a super nice trigger. I am very pleased. I changed the wood grips to rubber to suit my needs.

I have a S&W 64-2 that is also a very nice gun. It was a CDC Police Trade that I picked up at a local gun/beef jerky/beanie baby sale. It is also a great quality gun and is a bit larger than the 605.

The 64-2 is the K frame gun
The 605 is modeled after the J frame gun (smaller of the two)

All in all, I like my Taurus very much and will likely buy another at some point.
 
MCgunner said:
Why not a 1911 Harley? :D Is that a knuckle or flat head????? Either way, has to be cool!:D
Not to jack a thread, but her heart - the bottom end - is a 1949 Panhead. The top end is a 1972 (I think!) Shovelhead. She's bored, stroked and cammed. Built 'er from the ground up, with the help of a few Bros. Pretty trick setup - hypo torque!
She's not close to stock, but she's fast and aaaalllll Harley!
OkayokayOKAY!!!!
I'm done now...
:)
Biker
 
joab said:
Well at least you take the time to write out a well thought out assessment of the product.

Trolls and bashers same thing different bridge

I have shot them, worked on them, and dealt with them for more than 35 years. I thought their deficiencies had been well pointed out by other posters on this thread and I thought that most of what I had to say in light of that, beyond expressing my agreement succinctly, was pretty much redundant. I think I can agree without have to justify my feelings in detail. But, if that isn't enough for you and you choose to bash me with your lame sarcasm, :eek: then stand on the bridge with your fellow trolls as I explain.
While there may indeed be some decent examples out there, I have yet to be impressed by either the accuracy or workmanship of a Taurus product when fairly compared side by side to a comparable American one. They are and have always been a cheap imitation of S&W, using their visual similarity to the accepted and quality products to market their inferior efforts. The parts are foreign made out of poor quality steels to looser tolerances and assembled here by unskilled workers and sold at lower prices to unsuspecting or apathetic buyers. They do not in my experience stand up at all well to heavy usage. Witness how many serious competitors use their products. Damned few and for obvious reasons. :rolleyes:
Not to say that I have never had problems with new Smiths or Rugers, and I will not argue that these problems are not increasing in frequency, but the products themselves and the quality control methods practiced by both manufacturers are far ahead of any efforts along those lines that Taurus has employed in the past or does employ now. If you keep them shined up nice and don't put more than a box or three through them in a year, they might indeed last you a while sitting in a holster, but if you practice enough to stay proficient, their shortcomings soon become apparent and you quickly move up to a real one. :cool:
One positive thing I have to say for them is that they are usually well polished and blued, but you can't always judge a book by its cover, especially these. You can spray deodorizer on fertilizer and maybe by so doing change another's perception of it, but it does not alter the reality of which end of the bull it came out of. :barf:
 
Biker said:
Not to jack a thread, but her heart - the bottom end - is a 1949 Panhead. The top end is a 1972 (I think!) Shovelhead. She's bored, stroked and cammed. Built 'er from the ground up, with the help of a few Bros. Pretty trick setup - hypo torque!
She's not close to stock, but she's fast and aaaalllll Harley!
OkayokayOKAY!!!!
I'm done now...
:)
Biker

Mmmm, didn't realize pans went back that far. Friend had a 64.
 
If you keep them shined up nice and don't put more than a box or three through them in a year, they might indeed last you a while sitting in a holster, but if you practice enough to stay proficient, their shortcomings soon become apparent and you quickly move up to a real one.

That's funny, cause I have at least 3K through my M85UL alloy gun I've had for about 8 years and it's still tight. My Security Six was getting a little loose when I traded it, but I've not had a problem with the little M85 yet. Actually, I never had a problem with any of my revolvers except that one M971 Rossi that snapped the firing pin. (see revolver problems thread)

I do think Ruger revolvers are the strongest made, bar none, in the world, though. I like Ruger firearms a lot. They're affordable and there's no more well built or well designed guns out there.
 
MCgunner said:
Mmmm, didn't realize pans went back that far. Friend had a 64.
First year of the Pan was 1948. Knucks before that and Flatheads before that. 1965 was the last year of the Pan. They're all good. I especially like the 45 cube Flatheads ridden in WW2 equipped with the leather scabbard holding a Thompson.
I lust after both-AT THE SAME TIME!
:evil:
Biker
 
Back on topic :rolleyes:

I bought a used M85 for $199 and after about 200 rounds had one Failure to Fire. Primer indention looked the same as all of the other rounds, so I'm blaming this one on Walmart WWB.

My first choice would be a Smith&Wesson, but I believe Taurus is a good alternative for those who just can't (and won't soon be able to) afford a S&W.
 
Can't reccomend them anymore I got a raging bull in 454 had problems with the cylinder unlocking, and turning back one hole after three times sending it back at my expense they finally sent me a new one I immmdiately traded for a Ruger. Ech time they sent it back they included the 5 spent 45 LC casings they fired thrugh it . they weren't finding the problem so were disregarding it. I was PO'ed to say the least I'll not purchase another Taurus. Their Customer service Blows. And their tech''''s need some gunsmithing lessons. :banghead: :banghead: :(
 
MCgunner said:
I was going to say I think HD was putting the flat head in the Servicar into the50s, maybe 60s, but since you guys don't want me jackin' this thread, I won't mention it. :D :p
Let's try to stay on topic, hmmm?
*whispers*
I was referring to the big-bore Flatties - 74s and 80s, and forgot about the Servicar.
:evil:
Biker
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top