Y'know, I may just be looking for an excuse to get a new type of gun. I mean, on one hand, I hate having guns that don't get shot. Like my poor neglected CZ-97, which I haven't fired in about two years. I don't want to have a big collection of shelf-warming handguns.
On the other hand, I'm always wanting to try something different. I think what I'm really looking for is a smaller revolver than my beloved N-Frames. They are a bit much to pack around, especially in my (admittedly preferred) 5" barrel length.
So why the Ruger? I don't know. I kind of admire the Ruger design. It's not pretty, but it works. It's tough. It'd kind of like my FAL in that regard. Not the American pretty-boy favorite (M14), but just plain works. I like the simple field-stripping, too.
Damn. I don't know. Well, maybe I'll find a good deal on a GP100 4". I can always sell it if I don't like it. Problem is, once I invest in a holster for a gun, it's a bit harder to part with. Left handed holsters don't sell as well!
I would've liked to have had a 4" GP100 (maybe a fixed sight model) when I was in Qatar, though. Would've definately preferred it to the Beretta I carried, and if any revolver can handle the Arabian desert, it's probably the Ruger...
Oh...I DO have a J-Frame. I have a 642 .38 Special. Nice little 15oz backup gun. If I were going to get a .357 snubby I'd probably go with the SP101. The added weight would be nice. A snubby can be challenging enough to shoot without it beating on your hand too.