More reliable: M1 (including M1A) or AK

Most reliable in field conditions?

  • M1 Garand/M1A

    Votes: 13 30.2%
  • AK (7.62x39 or 5.45x39)

    Votes: 30 69.8%

  • Total voters
    43
Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 1, 2005
Messages
4,631
Given manufacture by a quality manufacturer, which rifle would be more reliable in real world, living in the dirt conditions? BSW
 
Honestly, both options are very reliable. Both are piston operated, both are battle proven platforms, and both are offered in widely accepted and available calibers.
I voted for the AK because that is what I own, but I would not hesitate to use an M1A as well.
 
My CRAZY HORSE® NAVY MK14 SEI MOD 0 delivers AK47
Reliability combined with Sub MOA 7.62mm x 51 Accuracy.
My Norinco T56SHTF AKM has been nothing but reliable.

Both can be equally reliable.
 
If truly equal quality of manufacture, the AK. Much better dust sealing (for instance, it actually has a dust cover) and a piston/carrier system that rarely if ever bends, compared to the more delicate operating rod on M1/M1A systems (yes, I realize the Garand and M14 are not identical in this respect).

Of course, a cheapo AK vs. a truly well made Garand or M14 type might be a different story.
 
If your field conditions are bad enough that there could be concern about a rifle's reliability, odds are it's badder than you are and you have a lot more to worry about.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top