QD mounts and return to zero: an anecdote

Status
Not open for further replies.

taliv

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Oct 23, 2004
Messages
28,765
after the wacky group-measuring rant threads we've had lately, i thought I would share some groups I shot on new year's eve.

I'm still working up a load for this rifle, shooting over a chronograph and the components are lapua brass, 155g lapua scenars and VV N540 powder. (avg 2770 fps SD of 7 fps for one load)

Rifle: Knight's SR-25 (see http://thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=375661)
Temp: 35*
Winds: mostly calm, gusts to around 10mph
Conditions: highly caffeinated :)

anyways, there's two things interesting about these groups. first, while i love PRVI 5.56 M193 ball for carbine classes, PRVI's "308 Match" (175g) ammo SUCKS. I was getting 6" groups last week with it at 200 yrds in 30mph gusty winds, and I thought the problem might have been the wind or myself. but no, looks like it's the ammo.

second, I've yet to sort out the larue QD mount. I've tried adjusting it several times and I just can't get rid of a tiny bit of play (maybe half a mm, forward and back, not side to side that i can tell) that shows up after the first shot or two. I'm certain it's because I've not adjusted the mount correctly.

It took me a little bit to figure out what was going on (partly because i was also inconsistently loading up the bipod), but I finally did some tests and confirmed to my satisfaction that if I push the scope assembly all the way forward on the rail before the shot, pretty much all my shots are touching (at 200 yrds). if I don't, the bullets land not quite randomly in about a 1.25 MOA group.


so... for those of you wondering how close a QD mount will return to zero on a precision rifle, when it hasn't been adjusted properly

here's 5 rounds of PRVI w/o adjusting my mount
group1oh8.jpg


5 rounds of load J. POA was the -0. the 3 high right are due to mount movement, but at only 100 yrds that's a 2 moa group. also, i don't think that load is nearly as good as load H.
group2yw7.jpg


(group 3, not pictured, was just two rounds suppressed cause some kids at the range wanted to hear what it sounded like...)

5 rounds of load H, POA was the -0. 3 touching, and i pushed the mount forward before each of those 3 shots, but did not for the other two. resulting in a 2.5" group at 200 yrds. still... not bad. the cluster of 3 measure .4" center to center
group4vr3.jpg



5 rounds of load H, POA was the lower right dot
5 rounds of load H, POA on the upper left dot (except one where i stupidly shot at the lower left dot... crossfire!)
again, when i pushed forward on the scope, bullets are touching the dot and when i don't, they scatter around a bit.
group56ha4.jpg



the sad thing is... i've got the recipes for loads A-J in my note book... all except load H. for some reason, I can't find where I wrote it down! figures i'd lose my best-shooting load so far!
 
taliv, excellent and informative post ... thanks! I don't have a KAC rifle or a Larue mount but I am interested in load development with the specific objective of shooting small groups at 200 yards and beyond. My objective for this year is to consistently shoot 0.5MOA groups out to 600 yards with the two "new" rifles that I've put together. The clover leaf (load H) at 200 yards is very impressive and it gives me some idea as to what's possible. Obviously you're shooting well under 0.5MOA ... in fact, your 0.4" 3-shot group would put you under 0.25MOA .... IMPRESSIVE to say the least!! Now go and shoot some five shot groups with the mount pushed forward each time ... I'd really like to see five shots under 0.25MOA at 200 yards.

... back to reloading.

:)
 
I have found that with the Larue mounts I tighten them tight enough that they leave a little burnishing in the finish, and it tends to hold them in place. A little finish wear isn't the end of the world to me.

Whether or not this will work on a 7.62 I don't know as the recoil will be greater. I'm also not a precision guy, so I may be getting the same results you are and just don't have a way to quantify it with an RDS.
 
I have found that with the Larue mounts I tighten them tight enough that they leave a little burnishing in the finish, and it tends to hold them in place. A little finish wear isn't the end of the world to me.

Does the Larue mount have a recoil lug to butt up against the front edge of the cross slots like most if not all Picatinny/Weaver type rings? I'm also wondering why the mount moves backwards under recoil ... since it needs to be pushed forwards each time. :confused:
 
yep, 1858, the play is basically the difference between the size of that lug and the space between rails, which is not much. when i push it forward, i'm just moving that lug forward til it stops against the rail.

yep, rob, it's tightened past the point it's leaving marks
 
Funny that I get 1.25" groups with my Wolf 308 at 100yds. I wonder what Wolf "match" would get, if there were one.:p

Your load J looks great. I would ask for that recipe.:D
 
It took me a minute to figure out the gist of this post and pics. I think you may be letting the cost of your mount cloud your judgment of it's performance. It doesn't matter if it cost $300 if it won't hold a scope tight it's a piece of junk, get rid of it and move to a product that will heck even my $24 (all I could get) pro mag mount preforms better than that.... well after replacing all the stripped hardware:rolleyes:

Life's too short to waste range trips on non preforming equipment
 
got a link to the promag, krochus?

anyman, J was the worst
 
got a link to the promag, krochus?

anyman, J was the worst

Oh it's an el cheapo special for sure and would look completely out of place on a $2000 ar but it does work.......except for the crappy hardware it came with that stuff was stripped straight out of the box. I ordered it from e-bay out of desperation when my RRA mount went on forever backorder with deer season a month away

http://www.midwayusa.com/eproductpage.exe/showproduct?saleitemid=371698

wow they've got to be kidding! the price for these things have doubled since I last looked :eek:
 
so what kind of groups do you get with the pro-mag? do you remove it regularly?
 
so what kind of groups do you get with the pro-mag? do you remove it regularly?

My non free floated 7.62x39 AR is hardly a precision machine like yours and I did no real accuracy testing with this mount but it did allow me to attain a very reliable 200m ZERO with 3" or so 5 shot groups at that range and make the kill shown in my sig line. Again it was a desperation purchase because you know as well as I do that actually getting a flat top mount at any price in this current market is no small feat


I cannot attest to the QD return to zero reliability as I installed it before season and removed it in favor of a NM carry handle once season closed and won't use it again till November I'm sure it would do OK as it gripped the receiver very very well. I cannot stress enough however how bad the hardware this mount came shipped with, most pieces stripped out on the first test tightening. But if getting some decent groups till you can solve your issue with the larue is important it might serve as a stopgap measure.

I'm surprised your LaRue preforms so poorly. According to those I asked it's the mount to have. There is no real comparison in these two mounts the promag is a chinese piece of junk.....but it does zero and would likely serve as a low cost patch to get you in action during the months it'll likely take to get service from LaRue
 
Last edited:
I think the key here is the quick detach feature. I know of very few cheap QD mounts, and even fewer that are worth even their reduced price.

taliv, I'd try getting in touch with Larue and see what you can get from them.
 
Hmm... I don't know how many of those type mounts you have used, but in the several similar mounts I have bought or used, I have never noticed any motion once they were properly tightened down as described. I did have one come loose and start going fore and aft once, but I think it was not tight enough to start with. All mine have been on 5.56 though. I think I would call up Larue on that one.

I'm really just posting to say I'm jealous of that rifle, and I bet that setup is a lot closer to $10k than it is to $2k. :what: Very nice indeed.
 
I'm surprised your LaRue preforms so poorly. According to those I asked it's the mount to have.

like i stated in my OP, I'm fairly certain I don't have it adjusted properly. the point of my post was really "how bad can it get with decent stuff?" and the answer for me was good enough that I can still hit steel silhouettes/plates a long range even though I detach/reattach it every time i go to the range.

that's sorta why i was interested in the pro-mag performance. if anyone else has anecdotal data about how their QD mount performs, please share.

double tap
i've been doing that a lot lately. i sense a disturbance in the force
 
like i stated in my OP, I'm fairly certain I don't have it adjusted properly. the point of my post was really "how bad can it get with decent stuff?" and the answer for me was good enough that I can still hit steel silhouettes/plates a long range even though I detach/reattach it every time i go to the range.

that's sorta why i was interested in the pro-mag performance. if anyone else has anecdotal data about how their QD mount performs, please share.

Well I hope others more knowledgeable than me can help you sort this out. It saddens me to see a rifle as nice as yours held back by some simple annoyance. It is a very nice rifle indeed.

I will say that for what it's worth my M1S NM carry handle sight did seem to return to the same zero when I reinstalled it.
 
anyways, there's two things interesting about these groups. first, while i love PRVI 5.56 M193 ball for carbine classes, PRVI's "308 Match" (175g) ammo SUCKS. I was getting 6" groups last week with it at 200 yrds in 30mph gusty winds, and I thought the problem might have been the wind or myself. but no, looks like it's the ammo.

Okay, so it's not just my Armalite SuperSASS that doesn't like the PRVI Match..good. I thought I was doing something wrong.
 
that's sorta why i was interested in the pro-mag performance. if anyone else has anecdotal data about how their QD mount performs, please share.

If you need to use a 1/2" socket on two nuts to remove/install the scope, does that count as a QD mount?

:)
 
Neat report.

You might consider glass bedding the lug. It wouldn't be too difficult. Put parting compound on the rail, and a scosh, just a scosh on the bottom of the mount around and near the lug in question. Install per usual, and remove. Voila. If you have any of the bedding material that squeezes out a bit transversely into the groove, add a little to it to build it up some and repeat.

Your mount won't shift after that. And it will readily remove and replace.

My $.02 anyways.
 
1858, nope :) if you need tools, it's not QD.

that's something i've never understood about people who put BUIS on their guns but bolt the scope to it. ok... so your scope breaks, now how are you going to get to the irons?

stubbi, that's a FANTASTIC idea! thanks!
 
Larue

Taliv,
I used to have the same mount on a nice "Recce" ar build....match barrel...shot tiny groups. Well, I got lucky and got the mount adjusted right the first time, and it worked as advertised. I specifically tested it, taking the scope on and off between shots, and it returned to zero perfectly.

I remember this because I never really understood the directions from Larue, and figured I got lucky with the setup.

I would call Larue.
 
i talked to them this morning and am pretty sure I can solve the problem. i was basically a little apprehensive about over-tightening it, but they assured me it would be ok.


by the way, did i mention those groups were shot with a 7lb trigger? :)
 
update

saturday i shot in the rain for hours, mostly at 300 but I took one 5-shot group at 600.

These are my first and last groups of the day. It rained all day and pretty foggy (and I forgot my shooting mat) but there was no wind when i started, although there was some when I shot the last group several hours later.

I tightened the mount and shot this 8-round group: 3.7" total, but the three together are exactly half an inch.
sr253001ex7.jpg

sr253001buu4.jpg


So I tightened some more, and some more and some more and some more. It didn't seem to have much effect until the end, when I finished with a group at 600 yrds. Pretty much all of my 300 yrd groups were like the one above, give or take an inch.
even so, I still have high hopes for F-class mid-range this season.
sr25600ds5.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top