Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.
I had a gov't sized, Taurus PT1911 for awhile, long enough to put about 2000 rounds through it. I generally liked the 1911 platform, but after trying a few commander and one officer sized pistol, I decided to sell the PT1911. Instead I got a new Colt Combat Commander (1991a1) and do like the shorter slide/barrel setup. Also, having had an entended ambi-safety on the PT1911, I find I much prefer the traditional GI safety on the Colt.
My first 1911 was a 5" and I liked it but traded it for a Commander as soon as I handled one. I just find the shorter barrel balances better for me. Actually, my absolute favorite is the Colt CCO (no longer made by Colt), which puts a Commander slide on an Officer's Model frame. Outstanding carry pistol.
I also prefer the traditional safety over the extended patterns. However, I installed a short trigger to replace the long (plastic) one and a steel arched mainspring housing to replace the flat (plastic) one.
Doesn't show on this view, but I did an ejection port relief on the R side, to reduce the brass "dinging" that was occurring.
I prefer the Commander length because it's slightly more comfortable when seated. That 3/4" makes a difference.
For best all-around use I would say a Commander. I find them easier to conceal, they are still plenty accurate and have a good sight radius. Actually my carry gun is a lighweight Champion Operator. It is not a true "commander" since it only has a 4" barrel but it is a fantastic shooter in every regard and out to 15 yards I shoot it just as well as my 5" 1911s. Hope that helps.
I have always found that the Commander sized pistols just balance better in my hand than the full size Government model. For all around shootability, I would go with an all steel Combat Commander type gun. For CCW, I would opt for an aluminum alloy frame Commander.
I own and have owned many full sized and Commander sized models For me, its just as easy to conceal a full size as a Commander, but I prefer the feel of the Commander.
I have a Nickel Combat Commander in .45 that I enjoy shooting and that's a great carry gun, but there are others who would rather have a Government type in 10mm for defensive carry and hunting. 9mm super Government size make for excellent competition guns and make for good defensive guns because of the energy of the round and the capacity of the magazines.
I prefer shooting the 5" pistol. Seems to balance better to me.
But this is where is gets weird...
I'm in the middle of building a Commanding Officer (full size frame with an Officers slide) and took it to the range for the first time about a week ago. For whatever reason, the combination feels absolutely perfect to me. Recoil isn't too bad and the sights just seem to want to sit on what I'm pointing at.
I own/owned every length of 1911 made ---- from 3" to 7" --- the good old 5" is what I would pick if I could only have one. To me , the 1" less length with the Commander is nothing --- I can make the 5" disappear as easy as the 4" ---- with the right clothes.
Clark Pin Master. Very nice. I guess that's a keeper.
I like the 5" guns also. I've tried the Commander size guns twice and just can't find any appeal for them. They don't handle and track as well for me as the the 5" guns do. Most of it boils down to personal preference.
If you carry IWB then the barrel length doesn't matter too much. The grip is the part that is hard to hide.
I carry a SA Mil-Spec 5" and I like it for all-around use. If I had a separate carry gun I'd get a Colt New Agent or maybe a bobtailed commander of some sort so that I didn't have that sharp corner poking out.
I carry a a 4" Tac Pro II by Kimber. It has a full sized aluminum frame with 4" slide. The shorter barrel allows it to be carried a little easier and the lightweight frame makes it a lot lighter. With that said, while I shoot it just fine, I do like the Government sized guns better. I have two Taurus PT 1911's and a Springfield Mil Spec that has had a lot of upgrades to the point that is about the equivalent of the Loaded version. My recomendation for a first 1911 is to buy the Taurus, if you want the bells and whistles, or a Rock Island if you want something a little more plain jane. I have also owned two colts in the past and they were the reason I had not owned a 1911 for over 15 years.
I think I can hit better with the Government model over the Commander, but I can't prove it at the range. I certainly know the longer version looks right, but I prefer the balance of the 4 1/2 Commander. My experience with anything shorter (specifically a Kimber Ultra Carry) had been disappointing. My favorite pistol of all time is an electroless nickel Combat Commander, circa 1976
The Commander upper on the Officer frame is what I think I would personally like best for general carry purposes, but that Commanding Officer is strange, and intriguing to me. Really doesn't look bad to me at all. Is that a 1911 grip scaled knife? Incredible, you 1911 guys really love those things don't you? I should stay away for now, I get enthusiatic.
If you are making it out of two pistols you already have, then you know what you need to do next right?
Make a Government Officer, 5" upper on an Officer's frame. THAT would be cool.
Dan Wesson should put out a two-pistol box set, with an Officer's frame, a bobtail fullsize frame, and Officer's, Commander, and Government length slides, all interchangeable, it will be two pistols that you can mix and match to make whatever kind of 1911 you want. They could even offer an optional longslide upper to go with it!
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.