adam.lamb72 said:
Wow another dumb gunners mate comment. i must be doing something right. i am a qualified SAMI. I am warfare qualified and instructer at Recruit Training Command. That a job aviable to the top 10% of sailors.
You lack even a basic high school level of literacy in English - both writing and reading comprehension. For example, nobody called you dumb or made any dumb gunner's mate comment. In fact, if you had read and understood my post, you would see that I was skeptical you were a GM2; because I have never met a PO2 in the Navy with such a poor command of written English - and that includes a fair amount of Petty Officers who grew up speaking Tagalog, Spanish or other languages. Being illiterate isn't the same as being stupid.
Assuming you are telling the truth and aren't yet another 13yr old warrior with multiple Call of Duty tours under their belt, then all I can say is that you are never going to advance in the Navy unless you improve your literacy skills. You will definitely never make Chief with that level of writing.
As for being a Small Arms Marksmanship Instructor and warfare qualified; well, congratulations. As a former CTI, I wouldn't expect anything less of a GM2. In fact, I expect that a GM2 wouldn't be bragging about some fairly mundane qualifications that most people in his rate are going to have.
O and i forgot. if you got butt hurt because you think i was bad mouthing you overpriced ar. you need to grow up. i just asked why so much. i didnt say anyone was stupid. talk about going overboard.if i wanted to deal with bs answers i would got ar15.com. i guess an intelligent answer is to much to.i expected more espacilly from a moderator.
First things first, I do not moderate here. "Emeritus" is a latin word meaning "to earn one's discharge by service." I used to moderate here; but I found it took away from my enjoyment from the site. So I no longer do that and am the same as any other member.
Second, bitching about not getting an intelligent answer in semi-literate English after bragging about your qualifications is pure comedy gold. I don't know if you appreciate ironic humor; but literacy issues aside, you mastered it quite well in that response - everything from the "got butt hurt" comment to the 'i guess an intelligent answer is to much to.i expected" is just dripping with ironic humor. Thanks for the chuckle.
Personally, I was going to ignore your original post since I didn't think it was worthy of my time. I was just pointing out to bkjeffrey that just because someone says they are a GM2 on the Internet does not make it so; but since you have entertained me so well, the least I can do is help you with your question.
noveske. 3000$ lwrc 2500. its a gas piston ar. i can shoot as good with a custom model 1 upper and lcw 15 lower. 650$ i just dont see were the extra money is worth paying for a name.
OK, first, I cannot find any Noveske that costs $3,000. The most expensive model on their website is an VIS Recon model at $2,500.00. Second, I am not sure which Model 1 Sales rifle you are referring to - it is kind of difficult to discuss the differences in rifles, if you aren't specific about which two rifles you are trying to compare. I won't even get into the LWRC right now; because I am short on time.
I'll assume you meant to compare the
$620 Model 1 Sales 18.5" 5.56 SPR to the most expensive Noveske model I found.
Here are the differences:
1. The Noveske will use polygonal rifling and have a hybrid chamber on a 16" barrel instead of the E. R. Shaw SS barrel with a 5.56 chamber on an 18.5" barrel.
2. Noveske will have M4 feed ramps.
3. Noveske will have the stainless steel barrel bead blasted matte
4. Noveske will use midlength gas system vs. rifle length gas system
5. Noveske will have a Switchblock gas block for suppressor use. M1S will have standard A2 gas block
6. Noveske will have M4 feed ramps in upper receiver.
7. Noveske will have Vltor VIS monolithic 9" upper receiver - meaning that the upper receiver and quad rail are a single piece and rigid enough to mount optics along the entire length of the rail. The M1S will have a flattop upper and round handguards.
8. The Noveske will have a shot-peened, MP tested bolt inside an M16 bolt carrier. The M1S will have a non-tested, non-shot peened bolt in an AR15 carrier - not sure if it is shrouded or unshrouded.
9. The Noveske will have a mil-spec forged charging handle. The M1S will have "a charging handle" which in all probability is a 6061 Extruded piece.
10. Noveske will have AAC 51 Blackout muzzle device instead of A2 muzzle device of M1S
11. Noveske will have mil-sepc receiver extension with Vltor iMod stock and Noveske QD endplate and H buffer. M1S will have standard A2 stock and extension.
12. Noveske will have Troy flip front and rear sights. The M1S will have an A2 gas block if you want it, otherwise no sights.
13. Noveske has Tangodown grip. M1S has standard A2 grip.
There are probably a few more differences; but that should be plenty to get you started - and since you are a GM2, I won't have to explain what each of those pieces do, so we save time there as well. As you can see though, accuracy is only part of the difference. There are many smaller areas where the differences add up.
