Maybe there is no right to fly and no right to drive but I do recall something somewhere about freedom from unreasonable search and seizure and a basic right to self defense.
Allow ccw on the planes. Is that not the argument we make here? Legal possession of firearms is a crime deterrent, and valuable defensive right. How far will a few terrorists get, if 10% of a 400 passenger plane is carrying?
Well these are both very interesting arguments - I will preface my comments that I am about as PRO CCW as you can get. However, I recognized that there are situations where you have to surrender your sidearm for the overall good; eg. courtrooms, political speaches, and airplanes for instance, and just rely on the provided security to handle the job.
Think of the choas a BAD person or a group of BAD people could cause if you were allowed to CCW on an airplane and these 10 BAD people planned a coordinated attack. If their goal was to just simply to bring down an airplane over a populated city, that would be easy if they could ccw on the flight. So in reality your ccw would be useless if 10 others started a surprise gunfight. Everyone on the flight and many on the ground would perish, and the cost would be in the tens of millions of dollars. And this scenario could play out at a coordinated time on the same day across the world or nation. No thanks. As much as I hate the security checkpoints, and I rarely fly if I can drive there instead, I'll prefer (common sense) TSA measures, even if some of it is smoke and mirrors.
Sometimes you've just got to briefly surrender your rights to participate in the overall good and efficiency of the system.
As for flying vs. driving, whoever said you have a choice is generally right. Unless your business forces you to fly, you can drive. And in reality you can check your firearms and get them in a few hours when you land, and yes you are safer by not allowing the BAD guys to ccw on the flight, even at the cost of disallowing all, because flights are a unique micro-world where gunplay can easily result in a lose-lose situation for all aboard.
Liquid and plastic explosives exist and are potent. As for liquids, fluids, and hygiene products, I've had to throw away a few new tubes of toothpaste and was really really annoyed. But let's be reasonable- you're flying on a multimillion dollar plane with hundreds of strangers, all with families, etc. At the cost of a few dollars in hygiene products, I prefer them to get confiscated rather than the potential for them to be liquid or plastic explosives.