New Colt Mustang coming in Fall $599

Status
Not open for further replies.

Para Cassatt

Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
62
Location
Camden, SC
They posted this on their website a week ago but I haven't visited the site since then. The pic in the pdf file isn't the best but it's still a great looking little gun. I spoke with the customer service guy on Friday afternoon and he said they are expecting to hit the Fall deadline and the price isn't bad either.
 
I also heard they are bringing back the pocketlite .380, but I thought they were referring to the double action model.

Colt, you're a bit behind the curve, bring back the pocket 9!
 
I have a Mustang Pocketlight from the mid 90's and a P238 and a LCP.

The SIG is my favorite because of the awesome sights. I hate the sights on the LCP and Mustang. Glad to see colt is moving more consumer but they need to update their design, else why buy it over a P238?
 
With modern sights and an MSRP of $599, they could have a winner on their hands. So much better looking than the blocky Sig.
 
While I probably won't buy one, it is nice to see Colt coming out with some new models. Now we just need some new Colt DA revolvers.
 
You know Colt had to have been kicking themselves when sig started selling truckloads of 238's.

I love my 238 and will no doubt pick up the new colt model as well.
 
Dr.Rob

I'd feel better about it if they improved the safety to lock the slide.
I'm curious as to why you would say that. Could you explain a bit?

I was unaware (never noticed?) that the safety was different from the "normal" 1911 style. I'll have to look at this feature (If I ever see one of these things, fall is a long way away).

I'm not a 380 fan, but these guys look like they would be worth a second look.

Link to announcement...
http://www.coltsmfg.com/Portals/0/News/Colt_380_Mustang_Announce.pdf
 
On a real 1911, there is a cut in the slide that the thumb safety fits into, which keeps the slide from being retracted while the safety is on. The P238/Mustang don't have that cut in the slide. With it's lighter spring weight, the slide has more potential to be pushed out of battery by a tight holster. If the safety locked the slide, it wouldn't be a potential problem. I haven't had my Sig P238 have that issue, but I do have a snug holster that will often push my LCP out of battery, so I can see the concern.
 
I handled one couple months back at the NRA show . It looks like and they also said was the exact copy of the original pocket lite . I have 2 of the older Mustangs when they hit the street I will have 3 .

I'd feel better about it if they improved the safety to lock the slide.

I think he referring to fact you can have safety on and chamber or eject a round It doesn't lock up slide like a 1911 . These look like 1911's but their a different pistol all to gather. . They are safe to carry condition 1 Just that you can move the slide, bothers some. Mustang have very soft recoil even shooting Corbon or BB ammo.
Like most 380 the sights are small But these are close range SD pistols not match target guns. Look over the slide and you will hit. .

Look at handguns thru history they all have pretty bad sights except target pistols. Lots of people have been stopped by these pistols with the bad sights. I don't think you will even see the sight if your shooting for real. Police don't remember seeing their sights in shooting.
 
It's a great little gun, had one in the 90's, but went to the double action one. To me they are too small for my big hands. The safety was always a seemminglly unnessary addition in a belly gun. I see Sig did it and kind of started a little momentum, but all those I knew that bought the 238, have either sold it or kept it but no longer carry it. It is a nice little gun also. The need for a bug, or second weapon, "as theses are used for by most of us that carry a second gun" is more easily put in motion by a lcp or kel-tec 380 double action in my opinion. It's a weapon of last resort, meant to be used when you either cannot get to your larger carry, or something malfunctions with your main weapon, or you need to arm a second person. There are more uses than the ones I mentioned, but listing them all would be subjective, so I chose my 3. The need to have yet another step, to release the saftey just seems like it no longer make sense in a tiny pistol. I have a 1911, and it's a different animal, the controls are larger and is not the same as handeling a 14 oz or less pistol. I am sure there are plenty of people who will disagree, and I expect that. But for my taste the lcp "type" pistol is self explanitory, you could give it to an unarmed party with little to no explanation if you had to. Also if you were hit in your right hand or shoulder unless trained to do so, you suddenly have a saftey to deal with on your weak side.
One thing we don't always think of is that while many "older guns are great shooters" at the time they were made, they did not have the alternatives that we have today. When I was a young man either you went with a snubby or a walther, or mauser, that was as small as they got. You still had a 30+ oz gun when loaded.
 
Colt does it again!

First, they build the greatest single action revolver in the world, then let Ruger and the Italians take that market away from the.

Second, they build the greatest single action automatic in the world, then let Springfield and Kimber take that from them.

Third they build a pocket sized 380, take it off the market, and let Keltec, Ruger, Kahr, Sig and others make tons of them, and then try to get back in late in the game.

I am not sure who studies the consumer market for Colt, but they don't seem to have ever done a very good job reading market trends.
 
but they don't seem to have ever done a very good job reading market trends.

they know all they have to do is slap the Colt name on something and it's good for instant Collectable status not to mention a high dollar price tag.
 
It's nice to see Colt coming back from such a long series of stupidity and multiple owners.

The UAW, State of Connecticut, and Zilkha & Co are responsible for a lot of damage and lost military contracts.

I was watching an old History Channel show the other day that was pretty entertaining. Showed the Colt Single Action Army and a number of other handguns. The show ended with a short piece on the "future of handguns" with the "smart guns" Colt was developing. The dark days of Colt :barf:

The 90s were bad time for gun ownership :eek:
 
I think it will make a nice addition to my new pocket pistol group. Already having the Sig I am eager to see a side by side range report and with any luck, future options for it or variations. Kudos to Colt.
 

Attachments

  • pl 006.jpg
    pl 006.jpg
    273.7 KB · Views: 66
Now if they will just start building the SSG.... Saw a picture of that one about a month ago and dang! They should have gone in production in it.
 
Colt got sued by Kahr over copying their barrel lug patent on the Pony and Pocket Nine. Kahr prevailed. That is why they stopped making them.

So if Colt comes back out with the Pony (I know its different from the Mustang) maybe the Kahr patent has expired? Or maybe they redesigned it.

One of the few pistols I regret selling is my Pocket Nine. Still have a melted and tuned Pony.

If they upgraded it to an sa/da trigger they'd be better off. The old 1911 battery of arms is passe in my opinion.

The little Pony is point and shoot. No issue with having a round in the chamber, no safety to deal with.

I guess the new one has a stainless slide and a better frame.

Anyone know if it has a firing pin block?
 
I would love to get a hammerless colt if they decided to remake it. It always made me wonder that why guns and cars, get a popular model that sells out evertime they make a run, and they make less instead of more. We have enough collectors edition everything at this point, just make what the people want.
Anyone who saw the remake of Dillenger wanted that gun, it's iconic, run off a few hundred thousand, they will sell out in no time unless they charge a grand for them.
A flat hammerless pistol like that is a dream come true, and it's purty. If they could make it in 9mm, same thickness, needs harder steel maybe, it would change everything again. Everyone would have to get it. Then they could come up with half a dozen different grades, Stainless, scroll work gold trigger pearl grips, the aftermarket alone would make their year. I know some of you can see it now.
 
Coltdriver said:
Colt got sued by Kahr over copying their barrel lug patent on the Pony and Pocket Nine. Kahr prevailed. That is why they stopped making them.

Eh.. I totally forgot all about that. Thanks for the reminder.
 
That isnt why they quit making the Mustang.
Which gun is this thread about?
 
they know all they have to do is slap the Colt name on something and it's good for instant Collectable status not to mention a high dollar price tag.

That tactic is only good for a very small number of sales, and won't sustain a business long term. You can only live off your name for so long.

They really need to step up their game. 1911's are fine and have a good place in the market, but they can't ride that wave forever. Colt needs some new designs that aren't 1911 (or look like baby-versions of it). This is if they even care about handguns too much anymore. They're more or less living off government contract M4's. With that patents on those long expired though, I'd be afraid. It's not as if the government can't request bids from another supplier for the same rifles once the contract runs out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top