Winchester 92, Saddle Ring Carbine, in 32-20

Status
Not open for further replies.

GMAN26

Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2010
Messages
79
I was very fortunate to come across one of these beauties in great shape.....It looks to be born in 1919. My question is did Winchester make these in a short barrel version? (trapper)
If I measure from where the barrel meets the receiver to the very tip....it measures 19.5 inches.

If I was to find out that the barrel was cut down....it would make no difference to me because Im in love with this rifle anyway. Pictures to come.

Thanks in advance.
 
What exactly do you mean "short barrel" version? Winchester did indeed make versions which would now be "Short Barreled Rifles" under the NFA '34 -- but which may be exempt if listed in the ATF's "Curio and Relic" list by serial number. Those barrels range in length from 12" up to 15".

We just had a thread on this: http://www.thehighroad.org/showthread.php?t=629035

But your rifle has a barrel which would measure pretty close to 19-1/2" and that's not an SBR.
 
There are a LOT of variables with old Winchester rifles and carbines. They offered all sorts of special options.

Your barrel is probably a 20 inch. Close the action and put your cleaning rod down the barrel until it touches the bolt face. Mark the rod where it leaves the barrel. That is your true (legal) barrel length. From the bolt face to muzzle, not from the end of the receiver.

They made Carbine model 92 with short barrels and a carbine butt-stock (band around the barrel and fore-stock) and they also made Short Rifles, which had either a crescent butt or shotgun butt stock and had the rifle type fore-end stock.

Back when I had money (before aviation) I used to collect Winchester rifles. I ran across and owned more than a few which had been cut back or trimmed during their life times. They were pretty picky about how and where they marked the top of the barrel. Sometimes the markings would seem to be far too close to the muzzle, indicating that the barrel used to be much longer when it was born at the Winchester factory.
 
If I measure from where the barrel meets the receiver to the very tip....it measures 19.5 inches.
That's not how barrel length is measured.

See Float Pilots explanation above.

rc
 
Thanks for the replies....I have since properly measured the barrel and it does measure in at 20" exactly. My confusion was that I thought anything 20" and under was a "Trapper" which evidently is not true. (after reading article on rarewinchesters.com)

Attached are some pics. I think this is a fine start to my collection.
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0129.jpg
    IMAG0129.jpg
    119.5 KB · Views: 22
  • IMAG0130.jpg
    IMAG0130.jpg
    81.1 KB · Views: 12
  • IMAG0131.jpg
    IMAG0131.jpg
    108.5 KB · Views: 12
  • IMAG0132.jpg
    IMAG0132.jpg
    134.1 KB · Views: 17
A few more
 

Attachments

  • IMAG0134.jpg
    IMAG0134.jpg
    46.5 KB · Views: 11
  • IMAG0135.jpg
    IMAG0135.jpg
    94.8 KB · Views: 8
  • IMAG0137.jpg
    IMAG0137.jpg
    104.4 KB · Views: 15
Yeap, 20 inch saddle ring carbine. Somebody refinished the stock......

My last remaining M-1892 (actually made in 1892) is in 38WCF. It is the rifle version. ABOVE with Rossi re-pro under.
Note the crescent butt and rifle style fore-arm.
 

Attachments

  • Rossi 92 357 and Win 1892 38-40.JPG
    Rossi 92 357 and Win 1892 38-40.JPG
    62.9 KB · Views: 18
Last edited:
Float pilot, I also had a 1892 in .38 made in dec of 1892, ser no 3024 it was a SRC, in great shape, sold it darn it, when in 1892 was yours made.
 
It is 11XX so I am not exactly sure. I only know 1892.

It has been in the family since then. The top of the hammer is so worn down that sometimes it does not cock all the way. The bottom of the bolt can't quite push it far enough. No luck finding a Winchester hammer. Maybe a little epoxy under the bolt would make up the difference. It is fairly accurate at 100 yards (2 inch group) if I use a light load and cast lead.
The rifling is a touch thin.
 
GMan, I think what you have is actually a "short rifle" version of the 1892 rather than the carbine version. The difference is how the tube magazine is held on to the barrel by that "hanger" dovetailed into the barrel. The carbines had foreward barrel bands next to the front sight.
This is an opinion .... I forget whether having a forend cap was part of the definition & I note yours has a band there.
But I think it's actually a short rifle.
 
It's kind of a cross breed it seems.

A short rifle would have a steel forend tip, no forearm band, a dovetailed mag tube hanger, and a curved rifle buttplate.

A carbine would have a forearm barrel band, a barrel band holding the mag tube at the muzzle, and a carbine buttplate.

Since yours has some of both, I'm not sure what you would call it.

Maybe a parts gun?

rc
 
Maybe its not much of a collectable after all. Guess I'd have to send the serial number off to Winchester to find out what it was originally. Anyone know of more sites where I can do more research?
 

Attachments

  • Model 92 circa 1922 32wcf.jpg
    Model 92 circa 1922 32wcf.jpg
    16.7 KB · Views: 3
Last edited:
Curious configuration. A pure carbine with a rifle magazine. Wonder what a letter would divulge?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top