Winchester Eastern Vs Saddle Ring? 30 Vs 32 calibers?

Status
Not open for further replies.

rWt

Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
232
Location
SE Michigan
If I was interested in an older Winchester 94 lever action- is there an advantage to the Eastern Vs the Saddle Ring models with either 22" or 24" barrel lengths. Which model typically has better hunting sights, for example?

Is there a preference for one caliber over the other( .30 cal vs .32 Spl vs 38-55)?

I'd like to own a good, well balanced hunting gun (white tail, hogs, and the like), which will appreciate( or not lose value) if it is properly maintained.

Thanks,
Dick
 
I think the .32 Spl ammo is hard to find, compared to .30-30. The .38-55 seems to be somewhat downloaded in factory ammo, because of older rifles. I had a .38-55 Commem, and the factory loads seemed like plinkers compared to reloading manual max load cartridges.

One thing about that .38-55 with handloads: It'll sure do the job on deer and black bear, although the basketball trajectory means--for me--a limit of around 150 yards or so.

Art
 
Saddle rings were intended to provide a place where a loop of rawhide could be attached to hold a carbine to one's saddle horn. Eastern hunters usually walked, and prefered not having the ring get in the way. The main purpose of the .32 Win. Special was to provide a cartridge that could be reloaded with black powder during the early days of smokeless. Excluding that feature, which is pretty meaningless today, the 30-30 is a better and more popular round.

Collectors like S.R.C. - wild west and all of that. The so called "Eastern" pattern is probably better for most of today's hunters, and is likely to cost slightly less, everything else being equal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top