While going for a drive with the family yesterday, my wife suggested I stop by a local guns shop for fun (yeah, she's a keeper). Anyway, I chat with one of the employees about looking for a carry pistol. He suggests looking at their 1911's. I've shied away from them up to this point because they tend to be such large pistols, and I have small hands.
Well, the guy asks me to handle, dryfire, etc. several of the guns. First he showed me several Kimbers. My thoughts for each were, "great quality, great trigger, great sights, but the gun is too darn fat."
Next he shows me an simple, ugly green Springfield because he wanted to demonstrate how much more work Kimber puts into their guns. His demonstration had the opposite effect on me. As soon as I held the Springfield I noticed a difference. Maybe it's just me, but it seemed noticeably slimmer. It seemed to fit perfectly in my hand, and the balance felt better. The slide worked better for me than the Kimber pistols' did. Next thing I knew, I found myself REALLY wanting this pistol. The green didn't seem so ugly anymore.
Now I want to emphasize that I thought the Kimbers were great quality so I'm not criticizing them. The Springfield just seemed more ergonomic for my small hands.
I have some questions for those of you who are familiar with 1911's. Are the Springfield pistols really slimmer than other 1911's, or was I imagining things? Can different 1911's have a significantly different feel to them? How is the quality of the Springfields? By "quality", I mean for practical usage. I'm more concerned with everyday reliability and functionality than winning an Olympic-level competition.
Well, the guy asks me to handle, dryfire, etc. several of the guns. First he showed me several Kimbers. My thoughts for each were, "great quality, great trigger, great sights, but the gun is too darn fat."
Next he shows me an simple, ugly green Springfield because he wanted to demonstrate how much more work Kimber puts into their guns. His demonstration had the opposite effect on me. As soon as I held the Springfield I noticed a difference. Maybe it's just me, but it seemed noticeably slimmer. It seemed to fit perfectly in my hand, and the balance felt better. The slide worked better for me than the Kimber pistols' did. Next thing I knew, I found myself REALLY wanting this pistol. The green didn't seem so ugly anymore.
Now I want to emphasize that I thought the Kimbers were great quality so I'm not criticizing them. The Springfield just seemed more ergonomic for my small hands.
I have some questions for those of you who are familiar with 1911's. Are the Springfield pistols really slimmer than other 1911's, or was I imagining things? Can different 1911's have a significantly different feel to them? How is the quality of the Springfields? By "quality", I mean for practical usage. I'm more concerned with everyday reliability and functionality than winning an Olympic-level competition.