Where were you buying AKs for $300?
I bought an SAR-1 a few years back for $269 and until recently, WASR's were running around the mid $300's to $400 locally.
I don't understand it. Guys shell out high dollar for the latest greatest AR rifles yet don't wanna pay a grand for a top of the line AK that will, aside from slightly less accuracy, perform as well or better as any of those high end ARs?
I don't remember the exact price, but when I bought the Arsenal I owned they were nowhere near the prices that they are now.
I know... "but the inflation... we got all this inflation!"
That might explain higher prices in general, but it doesn't explain the cheapest AK ever made coming in just a few hundred bucks under the price of a new Colt M-4 knockoff.
Part of is that we know that AK's were designed to be stamped, pressed, and riveted into a functional rifle as cheaply as possible. Other designs like the AR and FAL use a lot of machining and that makes them more expensive to make... so you expect to pay more if you want one.
But with AK's it seems like such an obvious ripoff to pay that much for them.
It's like paying for prime rib when you know you're eating roadkill.
Granted, the milled versions do cost more to make. They're also usually very high quality, so it's more reasonable to pay more for one.
But the $800 WASR I saw yesterday? I think anyone who's ever owned one would agree that they're not worth $800.
After having owned half a dozen AK's, I'm not whining that I can't afford one. Truth is that I probably won't ever own another unless something really just impresses the heck out of me.
But... wow! Sticker shock!