So this just happened in TEXAS

Check out this bill... Does anyone else think its a potential conflict of interest...


Either way... check it out.. and lets see what you guys think...


By: Perry, et al. H.B. No. 1421




A BILL TO BE ENTITLED


AN ACT

relating to the disposition of certain seized weapons.
BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF TEXAS:
SECTION 1. Article 18.19, Code of Criminal Procedure, is
amended by amending Subsections (c), (d), and (e) and adding
Subsection (d-1) to read as follows:
(c) If there is no prosecution or conviction for an offense
involving the weapon seized, the magistrate to whom the seizure was
reported shall, before the 61st day after the date the magistrate
determines that there will be no prosecution or conviction, notify
in writing the person found in possession of the weapon that the
person is entitled to the weapon upon written request to the
magistrate. The magistrate shall order the weapon returned to the
person found in possession before the 61st day after the date the
magistrate receives a request from the person. If the weapon is not
requested before the 61st day after the date of notification, the
magistrate shall, before the 121st day after the date of
notification, order the weapon destroyed, sold at public sale by
the law enforcement agency holding the weapon or by an auctioneer
licensed under Chapter 1802, Occupations Code, or forfeited to the
state for use by the law enforcement agency holding the weapon or by
a county forensic laboratory designated by the magistrate. If the
magistrate does not order the return, destruction, sale, or
forfeiture of the weapon within the applicable period prescribed by
this subsection, the law enforcement agency holding the weapon may
request an order of destruction, sale, or forfeiture of the weapon
from the magistrate. Only a firearms dealer licensed under 18
U.S.C. Section 923 may purchase a weapon at public sale under this
subsection. Proceeds from the sale of a seized weapon under this
subsection shall be transferred, after the deduction of court costs
to which a district court clerk is entitled under Article 59.05(f),
followed by the deduction of auction costs, to the law enforcement
agency holding the weapon.
(d) A person either convicted or receiving deferred
adjudication under Chapter 46, Penal Code, is entitled to the
weapon seized upon request to the court in which the person was
convicted or placed on deferred adjudication. However, the court
entering the judgment shall order the weapon destroyed, sold at
public sale by the law enforcement agency holding the weapon or by
an auctioneer licensed under Chapter 1802, Occupations Code, or
forfeited to the state for use by the law enforcement agency holding
the weapon or by a county forensic laboratory designated by the
court if:
(1) the person does not request the weapon before the
61st day after the date of the judgment of conviction or the order
placing the person on deferred adjudication;
(2) the person has been previously convicted under
Chapter 46, Penal Code;
(3) the weapon is one defined as a prohibited weapon
under Chapter 46, Penal Code;
(4) the offense for which the person is convicted or
receives deferred adjudication was committed in or on the premises
of a playground, school, video arcade facility, or youth center, as
those terms are defined by Section 481.134, Health and Safety Code;
or
(5) the court determines based on the prior criminal
history of the defendant or based on the circumstances surrounding
the commission of the offense that possession of the seized weapon
would pose a threat to the community or one or more individuals.
(d-1) Only a firearms dealer licensed under 18 U.S.C.
Section 923 may purchase a weapon at public sale under Subsection
(d). Proceeds from the sale of a seized weapon under Subsection (d)
shall be transferred, after the deduction of court costs to which a
district court clerk is entitled under Article 59.05(f), followed
by the deduction of auction costs, to the law enforcement agency
holding the weapon.
(e) If the person found in possession of a weapon is
convicted of an offense involving the use of the weapon, before the
61st day after the date of conviction the court entering judgment of
conviction shall order destruction of the weapon, sale at public
sale by the law enforcement agency holding the weapon or by an
auctioneer licensed under Chapter 1802, Occupations Code, or
forfeiture to the state for use by the law enforcement agency
holding the weapon or by a county forensic laboratory designated by
the court. If the court entering judgment of conviction does not
order the destruction, sale, or forfeiture of the weapon within the
period prescribed by this subsection, the law enforcement agency
holding the weapon may request an order of destruction, sale, or
forfeiture of the weapon from a magistrate. Only a firearms dealer
licensed under 18 U.S.C. Section 923 may purchase a weapon at public
sale under this subsection. Proceeds from the sale of a seized
weapon under this subsection shall be transferred, after the
deduction of court costs to which a district court clerk is entitled
under Article 59.05(f), followed by the deduction of auction costs,
to the law enforcement agency holding the weapon.

This is what I don't like right here....


"Proceeds from the sale of a seized weapon under this
subsection shall be transferred, after the deduction of court costs
to which a district court clerk is entitled under Article 59.05(f),
followed by the deduction of auction costs, to the law enforcement
agency holding the weapon."

It kind of lend to the idea that the more guns that get confiscated, the more guns they'll be able to sell in the long run.

I also don't like this

"Only a firearms dealer licensed under 18 U.S.C. Section 923 may purchase a weapon at public sale under Subsection"

Why not let everyone in on the action?

Perhaps... but if the end buyer can buy it from the ffl...why not just sell it to the end buyer...sounds like a nice way for an ffl to get guns on the cheap