Makeover - Tikka T3 Lite

Status
Not open for further replies.

ngnrd

Member
Joined
Nov 27, 2010
Messages
984
Location
South Central Alaska
About a year ago, I bought my first ever synthetic stocked bolt rifle - a Tikka T3 Lite in 270win. It was on clearance, so I practically stole it. But, as light as it is, and as much as I like how it shoots, I just couldn't seem to fall in love with it because of that black synthetic stock.

Now, I don't think there's anything actually wrong with synthetic stocks; they certainly have their place. In fact, plenty of people actually prefer synthetic on their hunting rifles. And as far as I can tell, the Tikka stock seems to be a quality product. But, I just can't seem to warm up to the thought of pressing a piece of plastic to my cheek when I'm out hunting in the wild - and very non-plastic - Alaska bush. It just didn't seem right.

So, I finally broke down and decided that if I was going to keep it, I'd have to replace the stock with something a bit more ... natural. At first, I was going to go with solid wood, like the furniture on all of my other rifles. But I finally decided to 'go crazy' and get my first laminated stock. It seemed like a good compromise for a rifle that will still have a few other plastic parts (although somehow I don't think it still qualifies as a 'Lite' model).

Well, this is the result. My T3 is now resting contently in a Boyd's 'Classic' stock, in their 'Royal Jacaranda' laminate color. The barreled action dropped right in and bolted up with no issues, and the barrel remains free floated all the way back to the action. I did immediately replace the thin rubber butt pad that comes standard with the Boyd's stock (which probably would have been just fine as far as recoil is concerned) with a thicker LimbSaver unit to give me a bit more LOP. I also swapped the Quake Claw sling from the old stock to complete the package. (I had already installed the Burris Fullfield-E1 3-9x40 scope.)

I think it looks and feels much better than it did with the black synthetic stock. Maybe now I'll actually want to carry it into the back country.

{And I know... it's not a great picture. It's the best I could do from my phone with poor lighting. I'll try to post up a better picture or two later.}

F06ECD9E-0729-45EC-8C5A-34CB4D785465-6218-000007C750E22438_zps6aa8011c.jpg
 
Last edited:
Very nice. I would like to see some more pics of it.

Is Boyd's now making Tikka stocks or did you modify another stock?
 
I'm going to try to get some better pictures today.

And, yes... this is an actual unmodified stock that Boyd's made specifically for a Tikka. I'm told that they will be hitting their website in a few weeks.
 
Very nice! If you're looking to get rid of more plastic, the chintzy bolt shroud is easily removed and these are available: http://www.hss.net.au/product_info.php?cPath=63&products_id=533&osCsid=541ccf9e2485a597c796fc0ed3a0b94c

I haven't bought one yet but it's on my short list as my bolt shroud has cracked at one of the flanges, which, from what I understand, is pretty common with the Tikkas.

If you don't mind me asking, can I ask how much the stock ran? I've been considering something similar for my Tikka. Feel free to PM me if you don't feel like making it public, or, if you don't want to disclose that, that's understandable too. :)
 
Looks great, and the comments above got me to searching around the web for aluminum bolt shrouds for my Tikka. Excellent! There are a number of them out there now - aluminum, as well as steel, in different finishes. Prices vary from ~$43 and up. Most expensive I saw was $85 for one made by Lumley.

Nice looking rifle.
 
Thanks for that link Jeff. I just might get one of those...

RE: Cost...

Boyd's Classic stock, inlet for Tikka T3: $92.00
'Non-Standard' laminate color: $15.00
Shipping to Alaska: $28.58

Witnessing the birth of a Tikka's soul: priceless.
 
Very nice. Just when I thought I was done buying accessories........

What do you mean by a non-standard color? What colors and stock styles are they going to offer?

How did the butt pad fit? Did anything have to be modified for it to work?
 
That looks great. Much better than the Tikka's synthetic stock, IMO. I'm also interested about the recoil pad.

How does she shoot now? Any special installation involved with the stock?
 
Which stocks: I can't say for sure how it will all shake out. This one is a Boyd's Classic, which I chose over the Prairie Hunter. I think I also could have selected one of their thumbhole stocks. But, since I'm not really a fan of thumbhole stocks, I didn't really pay attention to which one it was. And, I think their Tacticool stock was also an option.

Non-standard color: The three 'standard' laminate colors they offered for the Classic stock were: Pepper (gray), Nutmeg (brown), and Forest Camo. But, I wanted one in Royal Jacaranda, so it cost a bit extra. Again, I don't know how it's all going to unfold when they roll out the release in a couple of weeks.

Butt pad: I had already installed a Limbsaver 'Precision Fit' butt pad on the original Tikka stock (pretty sure it's part # 10011), but that pad did not fit the new Boyd's stock. So, I pulled the rubber pad off the new stock, headed on down to my local Sportsman's Warehouse, and proceeded to open every Limbsaver package they had in stock to try and match one up to the Boyd's pad. Eventually, I found one that was almost perfect. It is part # 10112, and (interestingly) is actually listed as a possible alternate for the Tikka T3 on the package. I say it's 'almost' perfect because the plastic base for the pad sits juuuust shy of the wood in a few places. Or, the wood sits just a bit proud of the butt pad, if you want to look at it that way. It's like the size is right, but the contour is just a hair off. And by a hair, I mean the calipers indicated the largest difference to be 0.02" - at the most. So, I don't think I'm going to get a better fit unless I have one ground - which I'm not going to do.
 
Last edited:
I didn't weigh it before, but my T3 "Lite" now weighs in at a beefy 132-ounces with the new stock (incl. butt pad), scope, and magazine. Burris lists that scope at 12-ounces. So - unless I missed something - the comparable weights would be my 120-ounce rifle vs the published weight of 102-ounces for the T3 Lite.

So, yeah... it looks like it gained about 18 ounces (just over a pound) by swapping out the synthetic stock for laminate, including the addition of the Limbsaver butt pad. I think that's pretty typical for this kind of swap, eh?




EDIT: Bobson - the stock was a pure drop in. I did absolutely nothing in the way of fitting. And, I haven't shot it yet. I should be able to work in some range time tomorrow as long as the wind isn't blowing...
 
Last edited:
I have used one of boyd's stocks for 17 years now on a custom ruger. Been a great stable stock and used in many a rain and snow storm. Mine was called a JR Classic back then-
th_107_4222_zps231a55f6.gif
 
Well, I did get to the range. But, I spent most of my time re-zeroing my Single-Six after changing the sights, and doing load workup for one of my other rifles. Before I knew it, it was starting to get dusky. I did switch to the Tikka and shoot a few 3-shot groups as the light was fading. Still, even with somewhat rushed shots, a warming barrel, and fading light, I was able to average 1.25-inch groups at 100 yards with Federal Premium 140g Accubonds.

I will say that if I were going to order another Boyd's stock, I'd probably spring for some checkering or stippling, especially on the fore-end. Maybe it's just because I haven't worn the 'new' off of it yet, but the fore-end seems just a little too slick. Of course, all of my other wood stocks are either well-worn, or checkered, so that's really what I'm used to handling. I'll have to see how this one feels after I get a few hundred trail miles on it. Or maybe I just need to find some of Biletnikoff's 'stickum' to wipe it down with.:D
 
Fella's;

Anyone found a source for bottom metal for the Tikka T-3's?

900F
 
Viking499;

Considering that D.I.P. can get you some very nice bottom metal for a CZ452 for about $120.00, yeah, I think it's kind of expensive. But, my gunsmith friend informs me that it's pretty reasonably priced compared to other centerfire pieces for other guns. He didn't have a good answer for why the big difference between the rimfire & centerfires. I don't see how the ignition process could have any influence on the price of the bottom metal. I better e-mail D.I.P. & tell 'em they're missing a bet & can make some money supplying the centerfire market with their product.

Besides, the Lumley stuff looks like it's for some tacticool gun. I think it'd look like crap hung on the bottom of a nice wood stock.

900F
 
Last edited:
I'm really liking the looks of the Boyd's stocks. Some nice options for stippling patterns too. Those just went on my short list.

Dear Santa . . .
 
Status
Not open for further replies.