Well, we have some stats to work with it seems.
Now, try and factor in the already stated stats that show that white males are the majority of WWW surfers. You could probably figure out, roughly, how many non-white non-male people WOULD have answered the poll with a little bit of work and fuzzy logic.
I was surprised to see education level not mentioned on the poll. I certainly don't think that actually matters when dealing with people one on one, but it would probably help to show a relation between firearms enthisiasts and higher education.
Now, take all this data and go find the corresponding data from the FBI that'll show you what social groups are least likely to commit violent firearms related crime.
Throw away "elderly asian women" as they're probably in the top spot.
What you'll probably find is that the very same demographic (us) that eats sleeps and drinks firearms and owns a plethora of them is the least likely group to commit a violent crime with a firearm. Kinda wonky, isn't it? Assuming my guess is true. We've got the majority of the guns and ammo in the country but we're the least likely to commit crime with them. How disturbing to the VCP.
WARNING: I'm going to get offesensive here with arguments I do not agree with.
Armed with such stats you could probably show:
- Minorities (blacks and Mexicans) show a low interest in legal RKBA with an out of proportion link to violent firearm related crimes.
I'd really like to sit down for a few weeks and assemble some really hard numbers on the subject to be honest. Not because I think only rich white men with a college education should own firearms -- but because it's be a horribly fun path to take the anti's down.
- ID a group with a low RKBA interest
- ID a group with high violent firearm related incidents
- Get the anti to subscribe to your "thinking"
- Watch them crap themselves when you tell them your "logic" calls for the removal of RKBA from blacks or some other group.
Their liberal everybody-needs-a-hug head would friggen explode.
Please don't take such comments as being racially motivated. If you can prove without a doubt that it's entirely impossible to show the above situation to be patently false please do -- I'd honestly love to see them. However, everything I've seen says that such a case could be made.