Zaydok Allen
Member
- Joined
- Feb 12, 2011
- Messages
- 13,274
The merits of striker fired guns vs. hammer fired guns have been debated and argued over many times in the past. This is not one of those threads. Both designs have proven their effectiveness and utility for many years now. We know that. Both work. No question.
However, I have always heard "consistent trigger pull" listed as one of the real benefits of striker fired, SA only, and even DA only firearms. I'm not disputing that. It makes sense that a person could become more proficient or become proficient faster with a gun when repetition of practice feel consistent on each trigger pull. It seems logical.
I my self started out on DA/SA revolver shooting. I practiced both modes of shooting as they provide different benefits. When I bought my first semi auto, it was a hammer fired DA/SA gun also, with a decocker. I got really used to this type of gun, and never really felt the need to switch to anything else. Then I bought a 1911, and was impressed with how easy the trigger made shooting that gun. So naturally I started looking at striker fired guns as well for their consistent trigger pull. As it turns out, my primary CCW is now a striker fired gun because it carries well, and I shoot it well. I wouldn't mind if it was a hammer fired gun though either, and I think it's just because I started out with hammer guns that are DA/SA capable.
So I'm just curious about the DA/SA transition that some hammer fired guns put us through. Does it bother you? Does it not bother you? Does it make the first shot significantly harder for you to hit accurately with? Does it not? Do you like all the guns?
I think the way we each start out has a lot to do with it, but I find myself just liking all the guns for different reasons, regardless of design.
However, I have always heard "consistent trigger pull" listed as one of the real benefits of striker fired, SA only, and even DA only firearms. I'm not disputing that. It makes sense that a person could become more proficient or become proficient faster with a gun when repetition of practice feel consistent on each trigger pull. It seems logical.
I my self started out on DA/SA revolver shooting. I practiced both modes of shooting as they provide different benefits. When I bought my first semi auto, it was a hammer fired DA/SA gun also, with a decocker. I got really used to this type of gun, and never really felt the need to switch to anything else. Then I bought a 1911, and was impressed with how easy the trigger made shooting that gun. So naturally I started looking at striker fired guns as well for their consistent trigger pull. As it turns out, my primary CCW is now a striker fired gun because it carries well, and I shoot it well. I wouldn't mind if it was a hammer fired gun though either, and I think it's just because I started out with hammer guns that are DA/SA capable.
So I'm just curious about the DA/SA transition that some hammer fired guns put us through. Does it bother you? Does it not bother you? Does it make the first shot significantly harder for you to hit accurately with? Does it not? Do you like all the guns?
I think the way we each start out has a lot to do with it, but I find myself just liking all the guns for different reasons, regardless of design.