Cavalier Knight
Member
The New York City Police Department did not violate the constitutional rights of a traveling firearms dealer by denying his application to carry a concealed firearm, a Manhattan judge has ruled.
According to state Supreme Court Justice Michael Stallman's May 14 decision in Matter of Knight v. Bratton, 101556/14, plaintiff Cavalier Knight requested a license to carry a concealed handgun for self-defense and to protect his wares from theft.
Knight is a sales associate with the California-based Armored Mobility Inc. and sells law-enforcement related equipment, products that Knight argues are in demand by criminals and terrorists, thus creating danger for him while he is traveling and conducting business.
New York Law Journal Article: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id...lers-Concealed-Carry-Bid-Upheld#ixzz3ajv4yefZ
Summary of my case: https://www.dropbox.com/s/o2gnlzamie5airg/00.Article.78.Knight.v.Bratton.Summary.pdf?dl=0
My Article 78 Petition: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/t57ps0qd7jfx0x6/AABfXFZZ569JsStMsKS98wZ2a?dl=0
According to state Supreme Court Justice Michael Stallman's May 14 decision in Matter of Knight v. Bratton, 101556/14, plaintiff Cavalier Knight requested a license to carry a concealed handgun for self-defense and to protect his wares from theft.
Knight is a sales associate with the California-based Armored Mobility Inc. and sells law-enforcement related equipment, products that Knight argues are in demand by criminals and terrorists, thus creating danger for him while he is traveling and conducting business.
New York Law Journal Article: http://www.newyorklawjournal.com/id...lers-Concealed-Carry-Bid-Upheld#ixzz3ajv4yefZ
Summary of my case: https://www.dropbox.com/s/o2gnlzamie5airg/00.Article.78.Knight.v.Bratton.Summary.pdf?dl=0
My Article 78 Petition: https://www.dropbox.com/sh/t57ps0qd7jfx0x6/AABfXFZZ569JsStMsKS98wZ2a?dl=0
Last edited: