Why do bullets keep keyholing out of my Ruger Blackhawk?

Status
Not open for further replies.

WVGunman

Member
Joined
Feb 26, 2014
Messages
380
Okay, some background info:

I test-fired this gun before buying it, with .38 Special +P 125 gr. JHPs. It seemed fine. The very night I bought it my house was destroyed in a fire (this was back in Feb.). My guns more-or-less survived, but most got rusted, including the Blackhawk. A friend scrubbed the rust off of it, and I Duracoated it to preserve it as a functional gun. (What the hell, at least it still worked!) I did have to disassemble and reassemble it at least a dozen times because the timing was off after the fire. Turned out the plunger on the side of the hammer that activates the cylinder latch was bent. I also installed a heavier Wolff hammer spring, a lighter trigger spring, and a Hogue monogrip.
So anyway, I have been back to the range several times with this gun, and every time it has keyholed bullets. Now, the only bullets I've fired though it since the fire have been 158 gr LSWC in 38 Spec cases. The first time it was with 3.0 gr Red Dot, the second it was 4.6 gr Unique. I adjusted the crimp for the second load, but the keyholing was still there, and very obvious after 15 yards. The bullets were Hornady, the brass various range pickups, but thoroughly cleaned.

I HAVE checked the crown, the forcing cone, and the mouth of all the cylinders, very closely. If they have ANY problems at all, they are microscopic. The bore also has no obvious problems. It's like a mirror, and I'm sure there is no Duracoating or rust in either the bore or the cylinder. I also fired the same ammunition through my Rossi 38, and it didn't keyhole then.

I'm almost out of ideas. But I did load up some .357 Mag cases with 125 gr JHPs and 6 gr of Unique (basically the same baillistics as the load I fired before I bought it.) If it still keyholes these, I might just get rid of it.

But, before I do something rash, has anyone ever experienced keyholing of 38s in a 357, or keyholing in a Ruger Blackhawlk, when it was NOT attributable to crown or barrel problems? What were the causes?
 
Measure the bullet diameter. Are they undersized or oversized? Test fire those same .38+P loads again if you can get them.

Also check alignment with a range rod and slug the barrel.

Sometimes one load/bullet doesn't keyhole where others will. If there are no internal changes to the gun and you are correct about the barrel otherwise, you may have either a slight 'compression ring' where the barrel is screwed into the frame or an oversized bore. While slugging, notice if there are any tight or loose spots in the bore.
 
I can almost guarantee that the JHPs will not have this problem. It sounds like you might have either a slightly oversized barrel or undersize bullets. Like retDAC said, slug the barrel and then make sure any cast lead bullets you shoot are at least .001 larger in diameter.

You may also want to pull a couple of your bullets after seating them and measure them to make sure they are not being swagged down by your crimp etc.
 
I am puzzled as it sounds like you have all bases covered. Just try some different bullets and tell us what happened.

I am curious to know the resolution on this.


(I assume you are not shooting 9mm bullets?)
 
Another vote for undersized bullets.
The only time I've experienced key holing was from that.
Like the others have said, check the diameters of the lead bullets you're using and the dimensions of the barrel and cylinder chambers.
So, don't pitch that old Ruger quite yet.
 
> I did have to disassemble and reassemble it at least a dozen times because the timing was off after the fire.

I'm no expert, but this suggests a serious safety issue.

Any gun that has been exposed to a fire may have become hot enough to alter the properties of the steel. If this gun became hot enough to set it out of time, that means it was hot enough to distort the small parts inside.

That may very well be hot enough to weaken the cylinder or the barrel, too.

Blackhawks are built like tanks and the extra margin might be just enough to keep the gun together for now. But any gun will fail if the heat-treatment of the steel has been ruined.

I would advise you not to fire this gun again until you can be assured of its safety.
 
Could be overcrimping deforming the bullets a bit. Those are relatively light loads and probably don't need any crimp at all to prevent bullet jump under recoil. Try just enough "crimp" to remove the flare from the expander step and to allow chambering of the round.
 
> I did have to disassemble and reassemble it at least a dozen times because the timing was off after the fire.

I'm no expert, but this suggests a serious safety issue.

Any gun that has been exposed to a fire may have become hot enough to alter the properties of the steel. If this gun became hot enough to set it out of time, that means it was hot enough to distort the small parts inside.

That may very well be hot enough to weaken the cylinder or the barrel, too.

Blackhawks are built like tanks and the extra margin might be just enough to keep the gun together for now. But any gun will fail if the heat-treatment of the steel has been ruined.

I would advise you not to fire this gun again until you can be assured of its safety.
This is essentially what I was thinking. If the heat of the fire (which it must have been, since it obviously isn't the smoke) has affected the pistol to this degree, then we can assume the metal's heat-treat has been altered, quite possibly to a dangerous degree.
Even if it turns out to be one of the other suggestions, this is still a major concern.
 
> I did have to disassemble and reassemble it at least a dozen times because the timing was off after the fire.

I'm no expert, but this suggests a serious safety issue.

Any gun that has been exposed to a fire may have become hot enough to alter the properties of the steel. If this gun became hot enough to set it out of time, that means it was hot enough to distort the small parts inside.

That may very well be hot enough to weaken the cylinder or the barrel, too.

Oh, I thought of that. I did have it checked out, though I suppose I could've gone a bit further down that road than I did. The gun was never directly exposed to fire; it was in a gun safe that was in a room that caught on fire. Flames never touched the guns, though it did get hot enough inside the safe to partially melt plastic bottles in there.
I don't think the heat was the cause of the bent part, either. The plunger in question is extremely small and thin, and it is in the very center of the gun's mechanism. It would be highly unlikely for the heat at the center of the gun to be so high as to warp metal, but leave the plastic grips unaffected. I think I just bent the plunger when I took the gun apart to replace the springs.
I have fired at least 100 rounds through it since the fire, though they were all as described, and not hot. The timing is fine, and the lockup is tight. I don't intend to fire full-throttle 357 Mag rounds out of it.
 
Could be overcrimping deforming the bullets a bit. Those are relatively light loads and probably don't need any crimp at all to prevent bullet jump under recoil. Try just enough "crimp" to remove the flare from the expander step and to allow chambering of the round.

Tried that. I tried firing the same loads both crimped and non-crimped, and it keyholed both. :banghead:
 
If the plastic grips were OK that reduces my concern a great deal, particularly since it was not a situation where one part of the gun would have been exposed to much higher heat than another.
 
You have "checked" the forcing cone? How?
Slug the barrel and see if there is a tight spot under the barrel threads. A lot of revolvers have constrictions there from the barrels being torqued in too tight and it is not good for performance.
The constriction can be lapped out or reamed clear out into a Taylor Throat.
 
Take one of those Hornady lead bullets and drive it through the barrel with a brass rod. Tap very gently so you don't expand the bullet. I believe they are close to dead soft lead bullets. Are you getting any resistance? Does the knurled side get fully engraved from both the lands and the grooves?
 
I'd find some new bullets. It may be that the "knurled" side finish of the Hornady bullets simply doesn't engage correctly with the rifling. This time get some with regular riding bands and lube grooves.

You can test that for yourself by forcing one through the bore as rsrocket1 suggested.

It might still not prove things out one way or the other. There's going to be a big difference in how the rifling engraves from a tapped thru bullet vs a fired one. Shooting the bullets thru the bore might be simply stripping that knurling right off and not otherwise engraving the rifling firmly enough.
 
You have "checked" the forcing cone? How?
Slug the barrel and see if there is a tight spot under the barrel threads. A lot of revolvers have constrictions there from the barrels being torqued in too tight and it is not good for performance.

I examined it as closely as possible with a flashlight and magnifying glass. It appeared uniform.

It sounds like slugging the barrel is a pretty common prescription. I was hoping to avoid that. *sigh* Guess I'll just suck it up and do it.
 
Keyholing of bullets happens when the bullets upset, and that can happen for a variety of reasons, most of which have already been discussed. The oversized barrel, bullet dimensions and timing have all been discussed. The chambers also can cause problems. If you remove the cylinder and drop a .357 bullet into each chamber, you should get an idea of the fit there. As others indicated, sometimes .355 bullets find their way into cartridges. Or, if you are using .38Spc cases and the chamber throats aren't properly reamed, that also can cause problems. There's also the weight of the bullets. Rugers tend to prefer heavier bullets. Whatever it is, I'd like to know, so don't keep us hanging!

How old is the Ruger, BTW? Is it stainless or blued?

..
 
Whatever it is, I'd like to know, so don't keep us hanging!

How old is the Ruger, BTW? Is it stainless or blued?
The gun is blued, made in 1982. I have other news: I tried shooting it one last time before slugging the barrel, with the +P 125 gr JHP load I mentioned above, and it DID NOT keyhole! I tried it at 15 and 25 yards, and got nice clean holes at both distances.
I now believe BCRider was right; it has to be those Hornady bullets, although it's possible the cases used may be a factor. (The 125 gr JHPs were in 357 Mag cases, while all others i tried were in 38 Special cases.) I'm loading up some 125 grain LRN at different velocities in both cases and trying those out too.
 
It may not be keyholing at all. Some target paper will tear giving the appearance of keyholing. Try different paper/backing.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top