Search results for query: *

The belt is completely useless. A rapist could just pound a woman in the head until she agrees to remove the belt. The rapex device can easily be checked for with a finger, and if found can either be removed, or the woman can then be raped anally or orally. Maybe a few rapists would fall for it...

sigh Another blatant assault on our rights, yet nothing will be done about it. This government is downright shameful.

Thanks for all the responses, this woman has her office about 2 miles away. I think I will stop by her office personally to deliver my letter of response. Maybe she will meet with me personally, after all, she is supposed to be my representative.

The most amazing thing to me is that the lies are so jumbled up with actual facts, that I find it hard to determine what exactly she is trying to ban. I guess she just wants the "assault weapon" ban back in effect which doesnt really cover any of the main points that she states. I also have...

Here is the inside. It is from State Representative Kathy Ryg

Lookie what I got in the mail. The BS is overwealming

I would vote for rice in a heart beat....its too bad that it will be Hillary who will be our next President. :barf:

There must be a misunderstanding. If the sign clearly states that firearms are prohibited, then there is no way the girls had a gun pulled on them. It was probably made of chocolate or something. We have the same thing here in Chicago, handguns are illegal. The several hundred that are killed...

A scene that sticks out in my mind is from a movie, (I forget which), where the good guy is running up a flight of stairs while several bgs are firing fully automatic weapons at him. The wall is shot up, the stair post and hand rail is shot up, even the thin spindles are being shot, but not a...

Turn dial to right 3 times, then to the first number Turn dial to left past second number, then continue turning left to second number Turn dial to right directly to last number

I like the medal of honor series, and of course both Max Paynes were really fun. I just finished Doom 3, if you like a gory sci-fi shooter it cannot be beat.

I agree that things seem a bit different than when I started shooting. There seems to be a lot of people at the range who are trying to be Hollywoood and just step up and rapid fire with no regard to where the shots go. I have even seen a couple of kids at the range holding their 9mm "gangsta"...

Obviously you would carry the one you are more comfortable with. As for myself, the answer would be my 357 S&W. If the gun is ever needed to be fired in self defence, only the hits count, and I would look to maximize the damage that the hits would do. I also look at it from a responsibility...

Even if you think there is no one else on the range, do not remove your earplugs until you are out. Someone might of slipped into the far lane without your knowledge.

Now I agree that the alarm is irresponsible, but I have yet to hear a compelling arguement that legally justifies his response. How is it legally justified to draw and point your gun at an unarmed innocent person because you heard a gunshot?

I am with CrudeGT on this one. Captain Mike "lined up my firearm on the closest target." , which happened to be an unarmed man. If the story is turned around, CaptainMike could be in a bit of legal trouble for endangering the lives of others, or reckless endangerment. Here is how the story...

OK, after reading this post I got curious, and as curiosity gets the best of me I decided to go to the range and test the theory. Quite simply I kept the down range lights out, had my friend mount a light on the target and he sent it down 25 feet. I kept my head down with my eyes closed, then...