Search results for query: *

Thanks misternoisy

I know these revolvers fall into the love it or hate it category but for some reason I have wanted one for a while now. I've held one a few times and read lots of reviews but most of them are older reviews which said they are great guns but have problems extracting the fired cases. My question...

So I made a few rounds and went to the range yesterday. First I tried the 90gn xtp with 5.7gn of autocomp which is the starting powder charge with OAL of 1.095 and the result was FTE, a blackened case and something spraying back in my face. So I tried 6.0gn of autocomp same OAL and same result...

I tried a few different loads and this was probably my best group (I'm not a great shot yet). It's 18 degrees outside with 5mph wind so my phone says it feels like 11. The load was RMR plated 124gn HP, Win case, cci primer, 4.2gn of Win 231 with OAL of 1.080. I used a Taurus PT92 from 15yds on...

The hornady book gives same data for fmj RN and hp xtp so I was thinking the shape doesn't affect the powder charge just the coal, is this incorrect?

The hornady book has 124gn data (not for the powders I have on hand) so I can use their c.o.a.l to start with and test it but use the powder data for the BERB HBRN TP from hodgdon correct.

I've just received some 124gn plated hollow points from RMR and I'm looking for some data to start with. I looked on the hodgdon site and all they have for 124gn 9mm is BERB HBRN TP. RMR says they have a thick plate on theirs and you should use FMJ data so I think the TP data will be...

I agree mine is reliable and accurate too, and I'm looking to replace it for the same reason. I've seen the specs on the bersa and it does say 1.4" but it looks like the safety may be the reason why it's so thick. Looks like it has a comfortable grip just wish I could find one locally.

The bersa thunder 9 ultra carry pro has caught my eye but I haven't seen one in person has anyone compared one to the xdsc. I have the xdsc and it's a great gun but I don't like the thick square grip, i assume the bersa is about the same thickness but the dimensions online are at the largest...

My original question was on the win 231 powder because I could reference it in multiple books but I have other powders, do any of these typically have better results for this lighter bullet - autocomp, titegroup, universal, or hp-38.

How come I can't view page 2 on my iPad or phone Oops, it was saying page 1 of 2 but looks like there was only 1

http://www.hornady.com/assets/files/catalog/2009/19-22_bullets_handgun.pdf This chart shows which of their bullets have a cannelure.

It's in the hodgon book and on their website Edit: Sorry, that's not xtp it's SPR GDHP.

Ok, I was thinking mid charge for the safety, but you are working your way up from the min for the accuracy. Thanks

Just cause I'm new can I ask why not go to the middle of charge range? Seems like it would be the safest place because most likely enough powder to cycle correct and should give you a little tolerance so you don't over or under charge. I could be wrong in my thinking though.

I will most likely go with the hornady data. There mins aren't the lowest and the max isn't the highest and the data is specific to the xtp. This is just the first time I've came across data like this.

These bullets do have data in both 380 and 9mm. When I found them I thought I would try them out, maybe a waste of money I don't know. But I do know I've wasted money on worse things.

Hey guys, I'm new to the forum and reloading and for this reason I'm very cautious when loading. I tend to go with a mid range load but with this bullet I'm stumped. I found some 9mm hornady xtp 90gr and my books seem to be all over the place. My three books state the following info. for win...