Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

1 7/8" or 2"

Discussion in 'Handguns: Revolvers' started by BP Hunter, Oct 19, 2011.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. BP Hunter

    BP Hunter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,514
    Location:
    WA
    Hello folks.

    I am looking into purchasing a S &W 38 revolver for pocket carry. I am trying to understand the reason behind a 1 7/8" vs a 2" J frame barrel. Is the recoil of either significantly different? Will the velocity of the bullet make a difference in "body damage" at short 5-7 yard distances. The revolvers I am looking at are the S&W 442 and 438. Additional information is greatly appreciated. Thanks.
     
  2. DenaliPark

    DenaliPark member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 2010
    Messages:
    581
    Location:
    Far north of global warming
    Don't worry about it, I'd go with a S&W 642 with the 1 7/8" barrel...Of more importance is the hammerless design which will not interfere or snag on your coat pocket...
     
  3. Owen Sparks

    Owen Sparks member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2007
    Messages:
    4,524
    I like the 3" version because of the longer sight radius besides, it is the grip that is the hard part to conceal, not the barrel. It runs parallel with your body. It is the grip that sticks out at 90 degrees.
     
  4. sixgunner455

    sixgunner455 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2006
    Messages:
    2,912
    1 7/8" vs 2" isn't a significant difference. You won't be able to tell the difference if you get a revolver of both barrel lengths and shoot the same ammunition through them.

    1 7/8" vs 3" is a much more significant question. If you intend to pocket carry the piece, then you want a 1 7/8" (or nominal 2") gun, unless you have really long pockets. If you do not intend to pocket carry it at all, then you pick based on balance and feel. 3" is a nice barrel length.

    Both of the guns you are looking at come with 1 7/8" barrels. You have to decide which version feels better to you, and which you will like better long term. I like the x42 versions best. I think that, carrying these little guys the way they get carried, the sealed backside of the frame is best because it keeps pocket nelfs and dust and dirt out of the action to a greater degree than the channel on the x38 can, or the exposed hammer on the x36 or x37 does. I have seen the channel on an x38 full of so much junk that the hammer couldn't move.

    Doesn't happen with an x42, whether you get the white (642) or black (442) finish. Which finish you get is a personal decision. Both work just fine. I've had a 642 since 2004. It's in my pocket right now, just like it is most of the time. It is one gun I would get a second copy of just to have a spare. Most guns, I wouldn't care too much to have an exact copy of. This one, I want another.

    Good luck with whichever you decide. Both are great. The first J-frame I ever shot was a model 438. Made a big impression on me.
     
  5. MyGreenGuns

    MyGreenGuns Member

    Joined:
    Jul 27, 2011
    Messages:
    550
    Location:
    Pacific NW, USA
    I have a 637 (full exposed hammer, 1-7/8"). I love it. Clip holster is preferable to pocket carry, IMO.
    My snubby
     
    Last edited: Oct 20, 2011
  6. BADUNAME37

    BADUNAME37 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    4,434
    I also would go with the 642 (stainless color version of the blued 442).

    I have one and it is excellent.
     
  7. ArchAngelCD

    ArchAngelCD Member

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2006
    Messages:
    21,702
    Location:
    Northeast PA, USA
    No real difference between the 2" and the 1 7/8"barrels when shooting. I own a M442 and wouldn't be without it!
     
  8. Chillaxin

    Chillaxin Member

    Joined:
    Sep 18, 2011
    Messages:
    35
    +1 on the 642. I've noticed this one is in my pocket more and more these days. I don't always carry a gun in my pocket, but when I do, it is a 642...:)
     
  9. Geckgo

    Geckgo Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2010
    Messages:
    784
    Location:
    Southern Louisiana
    just generally speaking, when it comes to barrel length, 1/8" means essentially zero. Will there be a difference, probably, is it measurable and will you even notice? Probably not.
     
  10. BADUNAME37

    BADUNAME37 Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2008
    Messages:
    4,434
    The Speer Gold Dot ammo specifically for "short-barreled" guns designates on the box that it is designed for barrels that are 1 7/8" long! At least on the three boxes of Gold Dots I purchased!

    When I read that, I realized I couldn't get any better ammo than ammo apparently designed around my S&W 642!
     
  11. MCgunner

    MCgunner Member

    Joined:
    Dec 3, 2005
    Messages:
    24,960
    Location:
    The end of the road between Sodom and Gomorrah Tex
    Unless you pocket carry as I do. I hate belt carry, can't do it 24/7 down here in the heat with how I have to dress. Everyone has different requirements, but a 642 makes a damned fine pocket revolver IMHO.

    Determine FIRST how you're going to carry. If you wanna belt carry, then the 3" barrel DOES make a lot of sense. I can consistently shoot better groups with the longer sight radius on my 3" guns. But, I mostly carry a 2" gun in a pocket.
     
  12. BP Hunter

    BP Hunter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,514
    Location:
    WA
    Thanks for all your responses. I am really excited to get one.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page