1861 Navy Gunslinger Project

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sure are purdy grips there Das Jaeger.

Try that back in the 1700's and you'd get a head full of bullet for talkin smack .....Oh the good old days , less Marshals , and allot less people without common sence still standing to tell about thier Marshaling.

That's not quite right. Here's what I've found.

“The state of society and manners of the early settlers... shows very clearly that their grade of civilization was, indeed, low enough. The descendants of the English cavaliers from Maryland and Virginia, who settled mostly along the rivers, and the descendants of the Irish, who settled the interior parts of the country, were neither of them remarkable for science or urbanity of manners. The former were mostly illiterate, rough in their manners, and addicted to the rude diversions of horse racing, wrestling, jumping, shooting, dancing, etc. These diversions were often accompanied with personal combats, which consisted of blows, kicks, biting and gouging. This mode of fighting was what they called rough and tumble. Sometimes a previous stipulation was made to use the fists only. Yet these people were industrious, enterprising, generous in their hospitality and brave in the defense of their country.” Elaborating on their style of hand-to-hand combat is Englishman William Blane: “[Fighting] is only worthy of the most ferocious savages. The object of each combatant is to take his adversary by surprise; and then, as soon as he has thrown him down, either to ‘gouge’ him, that is, to poke his eye out, or else to get his nose or ear into his mouth and bite it off... This abominable practice of gouging is the greatest defect in the character of the Backwoodsman.” Known to the backswoodsmen as “fist and skull” fighting, it is little wonder they were obstreperous in either civilian or military life.

The fisticuffs our generation had as children are mild by comparison. Unlike us, the kids nowadays shoot each other.
 
His Jagerness said:'' I have never seen a skelaton stock for the Model "P" from Navy Arms , do you have a picture by chance BHP ? And why in Gods name did you get rid of those guns ? They are just Soooooooo Wrong , but they are just So Right . I would be hard pressed to ever get rid of these , especailly the now discontinued Uberti , this little badd mamma jamma is smoooooth..''

Economics my friend.I have a terrible addiction to firearms,and since my favorite redhead said I ''can't have them all'',I'm trying to have all of them,at least once.Being poor,that means I have to sell one or trade one to get the next one.I sold both of those to a black powder fanatic my dad used to trade with from over in Redding, then used the proceeds to buy my paper-cutter Sharps.The skeleton stock was a replica of the one Colt sold as a cased set with some 1873 SAA'S.
 
Gary

Hey , thanks , I try to do decent work :)

Good story there , you gotta respect a Gouger , especially a cold cocking one with no ears left :D , probably a pretty ruthless fello , or misses . :eek: :D

I suppose if I had any point to my 1700's comment , it would be that not many people took crap back then or even in the 1800's . People were not in the crap bussiness , taking or giving , as it was often met with another fellow calling you out to Duel for disrespecting him or her , or being Gouged for pissin someone off , or just shot for being mouthy or for snoring too loud like Hardin did . .
Unlike todays world , where you can do nothing to anyone that viloates you or disrespects you , or your lady , because were so civilized :cool: . Unfortunately jerk offs know legally you can't touch them so they do it even more to you . Sad pitty it has gone from one extreme to the other .

Back to the Post now :D , those grips I am making out of the Blood Wood for that little 61 finaly got seen by my Gal last night when I was showing Pops some of my work . The one side of the grip from the blank that has the fancy grain pattern made her comment , it was this " How did you put that in the wood honey " :D ..... I had to chuckle on that one Gary .

Das Jaeger
 
Das Jeager:
Hows that Gunslinger project coming along?
I was following it with rapt attention!
I just sent for an 1861, snub nose, in part because of you, and of course the snub nose Natchez Special and Avenging Angel threads.
 
Thanks Missuramoss... kinda a partial to it myself...

Well I din't get it from Cabelas, but I got it and a Kirst .38Colt/.38spl.
Hey it's still a C&B Rev ... only a convertable.

Well at least two of us like it Missuramoss :O)
 
Last edited:
Hey SG...mornin to ya..How's that lill '61 shoot with that conversion? I'll be gettin a little (and I mean LITLE) bonus before long, and am torn between a Rogers and Spencer, or a conversion for my 5 1/2 Navy. Did ya have to do much fitting for the piece to accept it? Sure appreciaye any info brother!
 

Attachments

  • Picture0043.jpg
    Picture0043.jpg
    66.7 KB · Views: 23
The opening of the port is the only grinding fitting you would have to do for a gated version vs a drop in.
Both the Kirst and the R&D conversions both go in with very minor adjustment if any.
I do have one for the Rogers&Spencer. One of the most accurate C&B and/or .45Colt Revs I got.
Here's what I did so ... had a Navy wanted a Gated Kirst or nothin'..waited bought and bought Revs... got an R&S loved it , got an R&D .45Colt drop in and Love it... then bought this 1861 Navy Officer's model and the Kirst .38Colt...
So I guess ya gotta know I'm a .44/45Colt lover that likes .36/38Colt/spl...and bought the R&S first :O)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top