1911 vs. Glock fight #3,987,93

Status
Not open for further replies.
ceetee
I say we stick a G17 and a 1911 in a box and let them fight it out for themselves. Just mail the box to me, and I'll be the official referee...
__________________

You could try that..... but Schrodinger's theory says that if you EVER open the box you spoil the results of the experiment.

Grendel
 
Why is it always glock vs. 1911?


Because the Glocksters have an inferiority complex and feel like they HAVE to prove their (relatively) new plastic pistol reigns supreme over the nearly centenarian veteran?
 
KInd of reminds me of all the riceburner riders always going on about how their bike looks just as good as a Harley but is faster, better, cheaper. Yeah sure whatever. You do it your way, I'll do it mine just don't expect me to have to use one of those ugly things...
 
Glocks are good pistols. It's simply cannot be denied. Yes, comparing Glocks to 1911s is a bit far fetched. It's like comparing different classes of cars. Glocks are more reliable than 1911s, but some people don't like Glocks due to the grip angle and 'gritty' trigger. It's personal preference really.

Amen!;)

BB John
 
I like Iron Maiden.. You like AC DC
I like Japanese/Korean cars.. you like Ford..
I like "Aliens"... You like "Tremors"
I like Reagan.. You like Bill

Hell.. I like 1911`s and pistols which DONT flex when squeeze them.. You like glocks who does..

Aslong as it works for me and you i dont give a damn:) Personal preference is one of the reasons that this world is interesting;)

Think about it.. If everyone of us have been attracted to the same kind of woman.... Well.. Do i really need to say more?

BB John
 
Diversity. Options. Preferences. Opinions. These are what make life rich.
 
All I know is, at 1911forum under the LEO section, very few recommend anything less than a full blown Wilson combat for a duty weapon. The same is not said about Glock. I own both (a Springfield 1911 that is) and a Glock, my Glock resides in my duty belt.
 
As far as popularity goes, they're basically the two baddest kids on the block. They're bound to fight (or rather their supporters are).
 
Benchmarks for reliability?

Depends on who's marking the bench, and when?

When first tested by the US military the M1911 ran 6,000 rounds w/o a malfunction. The 40 year old M1911A1s that set the benchmark for the US military in the early 80s/XM9 trials avgd about 450 rounds. The Beretta and SIG beat that (except in wet/dry mud, where old slabsides was still numero uno).

FBI 1911s and Glocks have fired 20K rounds w/o a malfunction. So have M9s. SIGs, HKs, and S&Ws in recent LE tests have gone 10K w/o a malfunction.

Lottsa good guns out there now.

Get what ya like, or flip a coin and like what ya get.
 
I love these debates, it is a chance for people to start sharing what they feel, may be fact, may be what they read somewhere, who knows.

I am a dyed in the wool 1911 man. I have owned, traded, sold them for 30+ years. In 45 cal I have to say that the ones I have owned have been very reliable. Maybe the “1911 fairy” has just shined on me. I love them old; I love them new (Colt series 70 re-issue only). I have owned them stock; I have owned them modified. They fit my hand and just are the only thing I collect and keep.

BUT, I also own three Glock's and shoot them far more often than my 1911’s.The reason is simple. I pull trigger they go bang. I use them for CCW and house guns. My reason for doing this is simple. I have NO emotional attachment to any of them. If God forbid I have to use one, I will not shed a tear when they spend a year or more in a police property room, easy to attach lights and lasers. I will not have to explain in court why I felt the need to have a “modified” weapon to defend myself. I do not worry about them rusting, I do not worry about them period.

Both have their place, and both are fine weapons. One is only “better” because we choose to say it is.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top