1976 Ruger Blackhawk

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
9,128
Location
SE PA
About two and a half hours ago I was sitting here reading THR when I started to get a funny feeling in the back of my head. It was telling me to go to Surplus City and see what guns he had in stock.

Far be it from me to ignore the voices, so I told the wife I was going out (didn't say where to :cool: ) and drove on over to SC.

He had some very neat stuff indeed. E.g., an Old Model Bearcat in pristine shape, with the original box, a 1902-vintage Colt SAA that some dufus refinished, an original M1860 that the same dufus refinished and either removed the cylinder rollmark or replaced the cylinder entirely, plus some other stuff. What really caught my eye was a Ruger New Model Blackhawk rollmarked "MADE IN THE 200TH YEAR OF AMERICAN LIBERTY" on the 7.5" barrel. It was chambered for .357, and had a second cylinder for 9mm, in the original red felt bag. No box or manual, however. Since a .357/9mm Blackhawk has been on my "short list" for way too long, I couldn't resist, and got it for what I consider a reasonable price.

Once I got the gun home I ran a BoreSnake with FP-10 on it through the bore and the chambers on both cylinders, and wiped down the outside of the gun with FP-10. It's in even nicer shape than I thought back at the shop. If this thing had ever been shot outside of the factory, I'd be surprised. The .357 cylinder has a faint drag mark from the locking bolt, while I don't think the 9mm cylinder had been in the gun since it was fitted at the factory.

The outside of the gun has a couple, very minor handling marks as you'd expect in a gun that's 27 years old. Other than them, it appears almost new.

Oh yeah, I am going shooting Saturday. :D
 
Sounds like a nice gun, Dave. (My name, too.) Write back with a shooting report. I am rather curious about the accuracy of such a convertible, since there is .002" difference in bullet diameter between the .38/.357 and 9mm cartridges. I find my own .45 Old Model convertible to be about equally accurate with .45 Colt and .45 ACP loads.
 
Greeting's All-

Dave, I think this was Ruger standard protocol for all
firearms made in 1976; the bicentennial year. I bought a
NIB Ruger model 77-R in .338 Winchester magnum that
had the same roll mark. At any rate, these weapons make
for a very nice keep sake!:D

Best Wishes,
Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member
 
Cool gun. I owned a 200th year SBH about 15 years ago, and now own (Well, it's my daughter's now) a 200th year 10/22. I always keep my eyes peeled for such things. :)

"Made in the 200th year of American Liberty" is certainly more appealing than "Dear customer, please be sure to read the Magna Carta, Roget's Thesaurus, and the owner's manual before even looking at this gun".

Take care,

Dave
 
Sounds like a great find. I hope you reconsider firing it. Im sure the gun works just fine, but it is worth vastly more in the long run if it remains in pristine condition.

Just a thought.


Oh, btw, please post a picture, if you can. Would love to see it.
 
Good job frodo.
Your Ruger was meant to be shot, a lot.

It cost less than $300 brand new.

If it was unfired and you sat on it for a few more years you might get $1000 for it. That would net you several hundred dollars profit.

But by shooting it now you can have a million dollars worth of enjoyment.

So ENJOY! :D
 
No Prob Frodo,

Its a swell looking gun . . . I like the range report too.

I think I found one of my own to purchase. With any luck I will pick it up by next weekend. I'll give you a range report and some pics as well.
 
Pickin' mine up Thursday, I hope. Will shoot Thurs or Fri if the weather's anything near reasonable! It's used, blue 6" (or 6.5") VGC from what I could tell. Now just need a cooperative doe!
 
That is one fine hair standing on its end incident with a happy ending.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top