This was one of the posts that Mike Haas posted on FreeRepublic.com. I believe that I mentioned it on a previous thread, that the NRA was touting that AB1044 is good for pro-2A folks. I mentioned that its bad for Jim March and others that are trying to prove favoritism and cronyism in CCW issuance.
Now, here, we have Mike Haas spreading the same thing into TheHighRoad.org.
I usually don't get into flaming and badmouthing people, but the NRA (and by inference Mike Haas) is wrong in this. AB1044 is bad. I've seen the same thing happen before, where the NRA tries to do a good spin on a bad gun control law (all of them are bad). And that one was being done by Paul Payne of the NRA at a Silicon Valley NRA Members Council meeting.
No wonder the SVNRAMC decided to call it quits, folded up their tent and moved away from the NRA banner, and decided to do it on their own. They are calling themselves
Golden State 2nd Amendment Council. Where is the NRA at for assisting in getting a
RKBA provision put into the California Constitution? Where was the NRA when the people fighting the Alameda County ban on gunshows needed help, (Nordyke vs King)? MIA, thats what.