Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

204 Ruger

Discussion in 'Rifle Country' started by General Tso, Aug 22, 2010.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. General Tso

    General Tso member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2009
    Messages:
    386
    Location:
    Ohio
    Any reason to use this over a 223? I can't stop wanting one, I just can't justify it.:confused:
     
  2. briansmithwins

    briansmithwins Member

    Joined:
    Aug 1, 2005
    Messages:
    4,129
    Buddy of mine has one.

    Flatter trajectory from teh higher velocity. He gets 4000fps from his handloads.

    BSW
     
  3. matrem

    matrem Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2008
    Messages:
    1,611
    Location:
    Central Ohio
    .22-250 /.220 Swift trajectory with .223 recoil & blast.(maybe a tick less IMO)
    .204 component prices & availability have improved to "mainstream", I'm not aware of a single disadvantage it has to .223 on the smaller critters.

    And getting Swift trajectory while still watching impact.. All Good!
     
  4. rcmodel

    rcmodel Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2007
    Messages:
    59,082
    Location:
    Eastern KS
    Great for prairie dogs & gophers.
    Not so great for coyotes.

    My hunting pard tried it for awhile then went back to his .223, 22-250, or 6mm.

    rc
     
  5. ctaylor

    ctaylor Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2010
    Messages:
    16
    Location:
    Tennessee
    I shoot a 20 Tactical, which has similar ballistic performance. As said above, great for prairie dogs. I love 223's out to about 350 yards. Yep, they'll shoot farther than that, and many will tell you they shoot it successfully past that. I can't. From 350 out to 500 (maybe stretch a little further) a .204 will still knock em down, and will do it even with some wind blowing, and with a much flatter trajectory at that range.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page