Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

220 gr sp for whitetail??

Discussion in 'Hunting' started by ldlfh7, Feb 21, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. ldlfh7

    ldlfh7 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2013
    Messages:
    692
    I recently came into a quantity of hornady220 gr sp 30 cal bullets. Would anyone try to take a whitetail with one of these or is that overkill?
     
  2. Gordon

    Gordon Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    8,293
    Location:
    central Kali.
    That is what my late Uncle and all his friends hunted with. I have and do use them too. They are big elk medicine and work well on moose. They work great on hogs. They drop a lot after 200 yards. They never blow up but allways open up. The blunt nose adds to the impact reaction and were said to "buck brush". If you shoot under 220 yards I think they are great if you can stand the increased recoil
     
  3. osprey176

    osprey176 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    452
    Location:
    SC,Midlands
    220 grain bullets would be much better suited for moose and big bears than deer.I doubt you would get any expansion at all.I think they would not be a very good choice.
     
  4. osprey176

    osprey176 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2010
    Messages:
    452
    Location:
    SC,Midlands
    Gordon,if you use them and they work,I stand corrected.Experience trumps theory every time.
     
  5. adelbridge

    adelbridge Member

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2012
    Messages:
    1,107
    Location:
    Texas
    what cartridge are you loading? If you are shooting inside of 200 yards the end result is not drastically different than 150/168/180 grain etc. You end up robbing Peter to pay Paul, energy levels are usually within 10% at 100 yards.
     
  6. Patocazador

    Patocazador Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2012
    Messages:
    2,723
    Location:
    Central Florida
    Dead is dead. To me overkill is blowing good meat apart with a fragmenting bullet, not using a big heavy bullet. Is a 12ga. slug overkill?
     
  7. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    43,265
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    I wouldn't select a 220-grain for Bambi, but there's no reason not to use them if you have them.

    I reload. I generally have plenty of 150-grain hunting bullets on hand. So, "inheriting" freebie 220s, I'd likely load them reduced, for eye-finger coordination practice.
     
  8. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    While a 220gr is excessive for deer I do think that RN bullet will expand on thin skinned game (the Hornady RN 160gr 6.5mm does), mind you it will still expend the majority of it's energy out the far side, but last I checked a big hole through the vitals is still quite fatal regardless of how much energy you dumped in the process, if energy dump killed we would all be hunting with varmint bullets and the Partition would be a piss poor performer on anything. So yeah, while they would not be my first choice I have little doubt they would take a whitetail deer quite effectively at 30-06 speeds.
     
  9. Texan Scott

    Texan Scott Member

    Joined:
    May 2, 2012
    Messages:
    3,184
    Location:
    The Texas Hill Country
    Time to start loading 300 BLK subsonics... Remington make a 700 with a threaded muzzle for it, btw.
     
  10. critter

    critter Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    3,167
    Location:
    southeast AR
    I used a 220 gr Rem RN to take my first deer (an 8 point whitetail) MANY years ago. It was out of an unmodified 1917 Eddystone.

    Killed him REAL dead, BUT he ran a bit. Poked a nice .30 caliber hole straight through him. DO NOT EXPECT expansion, but handgunners have been effectively using hard cast bullets (hole punchers-no expansion) for a long time.

    Just understand what you are getting and place your shots carefully. While not the latest, whiz-bang bullet and maybe not the top choice, they will surely work.
     
  11. Sav .250

    Sav .250 Member

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2007
    Messages:
    3,396
    Location:
    Central Fla
    Sounds like you got those for nothing. They will take a deer no problem. Use-um.

    Assuming you do your part.
     
  12. 45Fan

    45Fan Member

    Joined:
    Jul 23, 2010
    Messages:
    337
    Location:
    Indiana
    Like others have said, probably overkill for deer, but the price is right. On the up side, the chance of one exploding and ruining lots of meat should be greatly reduced with the heavier/slower bullet combination, kinda like some old timers that used the .375 H&H for deer used to say "you can eat right up to the hole"
     
  13. Carl N. Brown

    Carl N. Brown Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    7,919
    Location:
    Kingsport Tennessee
    What's the old phrase, "smoke'em if you got'em"?

    Paying extra for 220gr for whitetail would be questionable. Using them if that's what you already have is OK. Not using them for deer because they are recommended for bear or moose would be questionable, or using up your 220gr on deer and then hunting bear with 150gr would be questionable.

    Just my opinion based on reading "Fur, Fish and Game" fifty years waiting at the barber shop. ;)
     
  14. highbrow

    highbrow Member

    Joined:
    Nov 27, 2007
    Messages:
    85
    Location:
    SW Montana
    I have used the 220gr rn on deer in the past. Killed 'em the same as 190, 180, 165, 150, and 125gr 30 cal bullets. Used them because I have had them for over 30 years and never tried them.
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2013
  15. T.R.

    T.R. Member

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,560
    Location:
    Manatee County, Florida
    I suggest filling a box with newspapers or phone books. Shoot into the box at approx 100 yards. Check for expandion and diameter of "wound channel". In my experience quick expansion and wide wound channels put game down quickly.

    TR
     
  16. ricebasher302

    ricebasher302 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 15, 2008
    Messages:
    490
    Location:
    Wyoming
    Agree 100% ^

    I prefer my 350 gr .45-70 loads over a 150 gr from my 7mm Mag for whitetail if range is reasonable. Far less violence and no less death from the big slow fortyfive.
     
  17. Kachok

    Kachok Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2010
    Messages:
    4,429
    Location:
    Palestine TX
    Heavy and slow bullets stopped working sometime during the 1960 when we discovered hydrostatic shock and belted magnums, never mind the fact that 220gr 30-40 Krags and other sub 2000fps projectiles worked for your granddady this is modern hunting where deer's bones are made up of naturally occurring carbon fiber, and they are very hard to kill, much as moths evolved different colors to protect them from predators deer have been slowly developing an immunity to slow moving bullets and you have to have the latest and greatest ultra mag to counteract their defense mechanisms, and if you believe one word of that I have a bridge to sell you :D While I prefer bullets in the 2600-2900fps range a heavy slow mover that is still capable of expansion is as potent a bullet as any, just watch out for the added recoil 220s kick a bit harder.
     
  18. GooseGestapo

    GooseGestapo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 6, 2003
    Messages:
    3,274
    Location:
    W.GA
    FWIW: The worst shot-up deer I've ever seen was the first one I ever saw dead but on the hoof.
    It was shot with a 220gr Remington Cor-lokt factory load circa 1969.
    The deer was shot with the classic "Texas heart shot". Bullet impacted the left hind leg breaking the femur, transiting the intestines, and broke the right humerous (rt front leg bone) before exiting. The guts were jello and field dressed deer stunk to high heavens. Later, shooter claimed that he got the back straps, right hind leg and left front leg, rest was discarded by the processor as unedible.... (blood shot..).

    The Hornady, Nosler, and Sierra's aren't as "soft" as the CoreLokts. Shouldn't be quite as bad... But, for me, I'd sooner use a 210gr cast bullet at nearly same speed before using up the jacketed ones.
    But, use what you got !
     
  19. dprice3844444

    dprice3844444 member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2011
    Messages:
    4,264
    Location:
    se fla i love claymores 01/sot
    deer will never know the diffeence between 150-220
     
  20. Andrew Leigh

    Andrew Leigh Member

    Joined:
    Aug 14, 2012
    Messages:
    1,014
    Location:
    Johannesburg S.A.
    I think the general point is about using a heavier bullet than traditional weights for traditional animals.

    Taking out the exceptions that we can all quote about meat damage it is my personal experience that on AVERAGE, heavier bullets shot slower end in less meat damage irrespective of calibre.

    I have hunting friends that use light bullets and prefer to shoot these at the speed of light creating havoc with meat. Every hunt they moan and bitch about meat loss and I leave them to themselves.

    I hunt for meat and so reducing the damage is important to me, I shoot heavier bullets slower and get closer cause I can in our conditions. If I was faced with consistent 300yd plus shot I may well re-evaluate bullet mass.
     
  21. Zeke/PA

    Zeke/PA Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2005
    Messages:
    2,299
    Location:
    Southeastern Pa.
    I've used 180 grain Remington Core- Lokts in the .30-'06 for YEARS in the PA Deer woods with good sucess.
    Truthfully, if HUNT is the name of the game, the Deer don't know the difference as far as Bullet/Calibre go.
    I shot MOST of my "big woods" (Potter Co.) Bucks at a range of less than 75 yards, trail watching, 98% neck shots.
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2013
  22. Deer_Freak

    Deer_Freak Member.

    Joined:
    Dec 20, 2012
    Messages:
    662
    Location:
    North Carolina
    There is nothing wrong with the 220 gr SP bullets, especially in a 30/06. Here in NC we refer to them as brush busters. I don't think they will cut brush like a 12 ga slug but they do better than 150 gr bullets. I especially like them for hunting the edge of thick cut overs. Even if you don't make a perfect shot the deer is down right there. Unlike lesser rounds where the deer runs off even though you drilled both shoulder blades.
     
  23. courtgreene

    courtgreene Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2009
    Messages:
    784
    Location:
    NC
    Deer_freak doesn't speak for all North Carolinians... many of us know that bullet mass doesn't correct for bad shot placement and that "brush busters" are a myth. I've got no problem with him and am not picking a fight because I've never met the man or woman. I just want everyone to know that "we" in NC don't all agree with those ideas. Oh, and a 220 grn will kill just as dead as any other weight in a bullet meant for deer. just be sure you see how it shoots in your rifle.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page