Really you're gonna limit a 300 to 150 and now your pet 6.8 is good to 350. My god pour me one. At 350 yards a 10mph wind is a little over a foot of drift for your 6.8, missreading the wind 5mph at that distance could lead to a gut shot animal now add in marginal 850 ft lbs.
There is wind drift with all calibers, so your statement is exactly what?
That happens with the 22 caliber all the way to a 338 Lapua.
Any shooter needs to take wind into effect on long shots............
I do thank you for pointing out the rule of thumb for humane shots at 1000 ft/lbs, it did get me thinking, and was the basis for most of my replies.
I do think that an animal can be harvested at a lower energy level than 1000 ft/lbs, but I do believe, I wont be going out as far as I would have for hunting, if the shot presents itself, as I would have before this.
My new max shot on animals will be 350 (maybe even a little less) vs 400 with my 6.8
The 300 BLK has many positive factors, but its not a solid 200 yard hunting round as you have stated, at least not yet, or at least any bullets that I can find today
The 300BLK is newer, so maybe there will be a new bullet / barrel / powder combination to get it to and past 200 yards. (New products for 6.8 have increased performance over the past few years)
At the end of the day, the two calibers, three if you count the 7.62x39, all have their place.
Its an apples to oranges comparison.
There are positive but different attributes for both calibers
I will probably get a 300BLK barrel the same time I get my 223 upper, just to get some of those benefits. I would love to load for cast lead for the 300 as well as shoot suppressed (never lead through a can though) so my interest in the 300 would be shorter distances, where it shines today
But for now, for me, for hunting at longer distances up to a certain point, the 6.8 is my choice.
Take care, and have fun with your 300BLK