.308 vs 30.06 vs .338 . Which One to Choose?

I have been invited by a retired co worker for next years hunting season in Mississippi.

His mom owns more than 1000 acres of prime land near Waynesboro, filled with deer , razorbacks and some black bear.

So it sounds exciting! I only want to bring one gun. What do you THR guys and gals suggest among the 3?
Feral hogs don't take anymore killing than deer. Bear populations there are very sparse.

With that said, you are asking which of those chamberings you should use for deer. The answer is the one that you shoot well. Statistically speaking that's the lightest recoiling one. My son-in-law's family owns about 120 acres adjoining Leaf River Wildlife Management Area about 50 miles south of Waynesboro. They pile the deer up. One uses a 223. The other uses a 22-250. They hit what they are aiming for and the deer die quickly.
 
How did you arrive at that? How many from that area have you seen and weighed?
Thanks for asking the question. The deer I have seen in that area represented southern whitetail deer. Smaller in size. This is by design, with living in hot temperatures being smaller with less fat, they will stay cooler. Northern deer are larger with more fat to survive extremely cold temperatures. It doesn't make them any less of a trophy it's about survival.
 
I like the 30-06. It will kill anything in North America with the right load. I have killed deer going 200 lbs+/- with handloaded 130gr GC bullets. I my area I prefer my 30-30 Marlin but that isn't part of the conversation.
 
Feral hogs don't take anymore killing than deer. Bear populations there are very sparse.

With that said, you are asking which of those chamberings you should use for deer. The answer is the one that you shoot well. Statistically speaking that's the lightest recoiling one. My son-in-law's family owns about 120 acres adjoining Leaf River Wildlife Management Area about 50 miles south of Waynesboro. They pile the deer up. One uses a 223. The other uses a 22-250. They hit what they are aiming for and the deer die quickly.
Depends on the hog. Deer don't have 2" thick gristle plates or a bad attitude.
 
Guess Im a weirdo.....but I like short action rifles
In a Ruger #1 it doesnt matter, but my preference is for short action rounds even in those LOL
 
Of those three, I'd take a .308. My go to rifle for many years was a Model 7 in .308. But I got out of .30 cals several years ago.
 
Seems to me the 200-220gr game bullets are going the way of the dodo bird. Trying to get some 200gr Partitions to test and coming up short. ZERO 220's.
How do you feel about swift??
 
How do you feel about swift??
Swift makes fine bullets and they're probably better than Nosler but I was specifically wanting to test the 200-220gr Partition out of the .30-06.
 
Swift makes fine bullets and they're probably better than Nosler but I was specifically wanting to test the 200-220gr Partition out of the .30-06.

Nosler's kinda been on their Azz for a while now as far as production of hunting bullets go. I've had "in stock" notifications for .358 225s from multiple source for a couple years now. I'm finally just going to make the switch to Barnes, at least for 350RM.

I finally found a couple hundred .264 130 ABs a couple weeks ago.

Meanwhile, Hornady is taking over the world..
 
The Swift is bonded and a much newer design. I know folks that swear by them on dangerous game out of handguns but the Partition is never mentioned. I specifically want to test the Nosler.
I completely understand how they are made, I along with Bill Steiger pioneered bonded core bullets.

Yes, it's bonded and it also has a jacket design that makes it different from an NP, and THAT is why I don't like them as well at the NP.

I'm talking out of rifles here...

The Swift design generally won't penetrate as deeply as an NP, so less of them go on through. They also expand slower and that's not desirable when used on smaller animals like deer, or where you want more expansion along with the DEEP penetration.

I much prefer the Nosler's.

DM
 
The Swift design generally won't penetrate as deeply as an NP, so less of them go on through. They also expand slower and that's not desirable when used on smaller animals like deer, or where you want more expansion along with the DEEP penetration.
You know those two statements conflict with each other, right? At a given weight and impact velocity, the bullet that expands slower should penetrate deeper.

I really don't care to argue about it either way. It's the Partition I want to test, not the Swift.
 
You know those two statements conflict with each other, right? At a given weight and impact velocity, the bullet that expands slower should penetrate deeper.

I really don't care to argue about it either way. It's the Partition I want to test, not the Swift.
How are you going to test them, I'd be interested in what happens, maybe make a thread on the tests.
 
You know those two statements conflict with each other, right? At a given weight and impact velocity, the bullet that expands slower should penetrate deeper.

I really don't care to argue about it either way. It's the Partition I want to test, not the Swift.
IF you understood how an NP works, you wouldn't think I made a conflicting statement.

Your statement is only true IF both bullets are the same diameter from beginning to end, they aren't.

BTW, what are you testing them in for test media?

DM
 
Back
Top