.357 mag./9mm

Status
Not open for further replies.
There are no moonclips involved. The 9mm cylinder headspaces on the case mouth. Note that this only works on a single action revolver since you have an ejector rod which pushes the case from the inside rather than an ejector star which pushes on the rim/moonclip.

From what I've heard accuracy with 9mm rounds isn't very good due to the slightly smaller diameter of 9mm bullets (.355 vs .357). I have a .45LC/.45ACP convertible and it works great, but the bore size is .452 for both those cartridges.

If you watch this video you can get an idea of how the cylinders work
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jF7XYqOtc8Q&feature=PlayList&p=1B1FE2870FE4CF86&playnext=1&index=2
It's not me, just so you know, just some video I found.
 
No moon clips - 2 separate cylinders 1 for .38/.357 and 1 for 9mm

I enjoy shooting my Blackhawk the most of all the revolvers I own
and recoil is extremely light when shooting 9mm.
In regards to the post above, when shooting at moderate distances (indoor range)
I see no difference in accuracy between 9mm and the .38/.357
I realize that the 9mm are undersized but the .002 difference doesn't seem to matter
as much as it's been portrayed on internet forums (jmho).
 
I have one. In my convertible blackhawk 9mm rounds will hold an easy 3" at 25 yards if I do my part.

One thing I have found:

They seem to prefer the heavy 147 grainers over the lighter offerings. My theory on that is: given that the 9mms .355 diameter slug just kind of rides the riflings, the longer slug gets enough more bite to stabilize better.

This has held true in the half dozen or so of them I've fired.
 
The .380 ACP is a lot smaller around & shorter then a 9mm.
It would just fall in and get lost in a SA 9mm cylinder.
The firing pin wouldn't reach it.

rc
 
I just download .357 brass for plinking.

Some folks reports are that the 9MM cylinders are not that accurate because of the smaller diameter of the 9MM bullet in relation to the bore, but I have no experience here.
 
I played with mine for a long time with different loads and bullets and found that a cast, 110 gr. semi-wadcutter from my old obsolete Ideal mold will load into the 9MM case with enough flare and is very accurate in my 30 yr. old RBH convertible. I size that bullet .358. I had my 9MM cylinder nickel plated so I can tell at a glance which cylinder is in the gun.
 
A buddy had one and I found it fun to shoot. I would not buy on though. Too slow to reload for a 9mm. I would just go with the 357 mag and tailor the power level of the reloads.
 
This very gun was my first handgun that I ever purchased.
Ruger New Model Blackhawk .357/9mm Convertible 4 5/8" barrel
260.jpg

One of my all time favorite pieces that I own.
I highly recommend it for all the reasons that have been posted and more.
The 9mm bullets definitely engage the rifling in the barrel more than enough.
I've caught bullets in media and looked them over just to see for myself.
 
I have 1999 vintage 4 5/8" Blackhawk convertable - it is quite a good shooter with the 357 mag cylinder. I have shot the 9mm on a few occasions , not really stellar accuracy but this was firing the "cheap" white box ammo from Winchester. I may try some reloads using the 147 grain bullets mentioned above by Ben Shepard.
 
9mm isn't so cheap any more.

Even if you get acceptable accuracy with it, the POI will likely be quite different. So you'd have to adjust your sights when you change the cylinder; it's not just a quick swap.

My .357 Blackhawk shoots to essentially the same POA with low-velocity light lead target .38 and with real .357 rounds.

Instead of paying for the extra cylinder, I'd use the money towards a reloading press. You can load top-quality plinking rounds in .357 or .38 brass for a LOT less than the cheapest 9mm you can buy, and brass lasts a long time with low-pressure fun-shooting loads.

I played with mine for a long time with different loads and bullets and found that a cast, 110 gr. semi-wadcutter from my old obsolete Ideal mold will load into the 9MM case with enough flare and is very accurate in my 30 yr. old RBH convertible. I size that bullet .358. I had my 9MM cylinder nickel plated so I can tell at a glance which cylinder is in the gun.

I think that, if you want an interesting ongoing reloading experiment, the convertible would be an interesting piece, as I infer from MMCSRET's post.

However, if you want to get the thing so you can save money on commercial plinking ammo, I'd still seriously consider a standard Blackhawk and a reloading press instead.:)
 
It's a good, solid gun that you'll never wear out.

Accuracy will be fine for casual plinking.

It is NOT the only revolver that'll work with the 9mm without moonclips.

While 9mm ain't "cheap" anymore, it's still cheaper than other center fire ammo.

As for accelerating the reloading process, use a 9mm mag as a "speed loader"

Also, you CAN shoot .380's in them, as long as they are the longer.380 MAGNUMS......oh, wait, they call those 9mm's!! :D :D :D

.

.
 
I think Charter Arms has recently developed a DA/SA 9mm revolver that works without moon clips.
 
While 9mm ain't "cheap" anymore, it's still cheaper than other center fire ammo.

Yes, but if you just get a regular Blackhawk and a reloading press, and load your own plinking ammo, you'll pay for your equipment before you've shot many boxes ammo these days.

The convertible Blackhawk costs an extra 60 bucks or so, over the regular .357/.38. That's a good head start on a reloading setup, especially if you shop around and get some stuff used. Or you can get a whole basic package for 105 bucks from Cabelas, plus dies. Dies are about $40/set, brand new. Say $150 total, minus 60, net cost $90.

Re-use your .38 brass and shoot for about 1/3 the price of cheap commercial 9mm, and that's buying lubed bullets and without even trying to reload on the cheap. IF you plan on plinking, that's a much better plan.

You will make up your $90 in 10 boxes -- 15 at worst -- of ammo. And from then on, you'll be shooting for a fraction of the cost, essentially FOREVER.

I don't much care for chasing my semiauto brass if I'm plinking. A single-action revolver, though, is about the best and easiest gun in the world for saving your brass.

The only reason a convertible .22 revolver makes sense is that you can't reload .22 rimfires.

Food for thought, that's all.
 
Last edited:
It depends what the ultimate goal is. Once upon a time, I thought the Blackhawk Convertible would be a good way to utilize 9mm ammo, so I wouldn't have to buy a "real" one, since I'd always been a .45 man.

So if the goal is to buy ONE affordable gun that'll shoot not one, not 2 but THREE different cartridges, then the BlackHawk Convertible is a very good choice.

Being able to reload would not address the verstaility of that second cylinder.

I've been reloading since the late 70's, so I fully understand the merits of reloading, but that wasn't part of the OP's question.
 
$50 for my 9mm cylinder

My Blackhawk Convertible costed only $50 more than the same (non-Convertible) Blackhawk without the extra cylinder.

Being able to reload would not address the verstaility of that second cylinder.

+1 there.
Everyone should get into reloading at least one round anyway IMHO.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top