.357 Special?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I really like most .357 mag revolvers, and have several. But I really don't like the cartridge (flash, noise, kick). Compare the idea of the .44 mag vs the .44 special.
Do people just fall back to using the .38 special? Or have some of you found a hotter .38 or a reduced-load .357 you prefer, as an alternative to the full-bore magum or the traditional .38 sp?
I like the .38 Outdoorsman (a.k.a. .38-44, Keith Load, Heavy Duty, et. al.) loads and those are easily replicated. They are past .38Spl +P and only suitable for a .357Mag or equivalently-built .38Spl (marked or factory lettered for .38-44 loads). I have a few Colts Official Police revolvers and Colt declared them suitable for .38 Heavy Duty back in the 1930's. I doubt a steady diet of such loads would do them any good, though.

Mike Venturino wrote a pretty fair article for Handloader back in October. Okay, so now that I look again it was in October of 2006. Time flies when you're having flashbacks. :uhoh:

If you want a little more than a vanilla .38Spl but not the earsplitting, writst-wrenching crunch of a .357Magnum, the Outdoorsman, Heavy Duty, Super Police Special (which was a heavier 200gr. bullet moving slower at around 800fps - in some articles [linked] the .38-44 is referred to as the "Super Police Special" as well as the "Police Heavy Duty" - but they are traditionally different loads), then I think this might get you there. I have as custom load I've worked up using the old Super Police Special which is a tamed wildcat in a 6" Colt OP. :thumbup:
 
Generally, charging a 357 case with recommended loads using a fast burning powder, such as 700-X or the like, will deliver stiffer than 38 SPL performance but will be much less stout than full charged magnums using a slower burning powder such as H110, for example.

There's almost an infinite number of loads than can be used in a 357 case to deliver "less than true magnum" results.

Bayou52
 
Why do people BUY and then first thing want to "load them down". For pity sakes just buy a 38 and quit fooling your self.

Because I like the revolver.

Because the same 357 Magnum revolver cannot be found or is very difficult to find in 38 Special.

Because I can.

Because I don't care to shoot full powder magnum loads these days but enjoy shooting the revolver.
 
The magnums were born from hot ridding the specials. .38 S&W (short) led to the S&W Long, to the Special, on to the Magnum and then Maximum.

.32 calibers are the same way, .32 S&3, up to .327 Fed Mag.

.41Mag, .44Mag, .45Colt are perfect for lighter loads, with a few full house loads, just too wake up.

Of course, shooters are going to load down to a more pleasant level. That is a part of why we reload.
Nope. .38S&W is a completely different cartridge which shoots a .360" bullet, not a .357", and has a different rim entirely. The .357 Magnum is a lengthened .38 Special, which is a lengthened .38 Long Colt, which is only loosely related to the heel-bulleted .38 Short Colt. The lineage of the .38's branches at the Long Colt up into modern times, while the Short Colt has been reconfigured to more closely resemble a shorter Long Colt, and the S&W - which has never been referred to as a ".38S&W Short" since there was never a ".38S&W Long" - remains it's own cartridge entirely.
 
I cast 12 different bullets for 38/257 it's basically never ending the amount of different rounds that can be produced. Never load magnum rounds because I only shoot paper. 136,175 so far including 38 short and long colt. :)
 
Nope. .38S&W is a completely different cartridge which shoots a .360" bullet, not a .357", and has a different rim entirely. The .357 Magnum is a lengthened .38 Special, which is a lengthened .38 Long Colt, which is only loosely related to the heel-bulleted .38 Short Colt. The lineage of the .38's branches at the Long Colt up into modern times, while the Short Colt has been reconfigured to more closely resemble a shorter Long Colt, and the S&W - which has never been referred to as a ".38S&W Short" since there was never a ".38S&W Long" - remains it's own cartridge entirely.


True,

I stated that the search for more power (grunt, grunt, grunt) led to the cartridges, not lengthening of them brass.

The Colts existed because Colt refused to make a gun that was stamped S&W on the chambering. Even going so far as designating the .38 Colt New Police.

Even then designation of .38 Special chambering in a .357 is confusing or not known to many news shooters.

I can only imagine the confusion and or headache in trying to stock ammo. Cartridge nomenclature may or may not have any correlation
A .38 is a .358
A .41 is a .410
A .44 is a .429
A .45 is .452

UNLESS you are talking rifle cartridges....
 
I cast 12 different bullets for 38/257 it's basically never ending the amount of different rounds that can be produced. Never load magnum rounds because I only shoot paper. 136,175 so far including 38 short and long colt. :)


Lead and primer shortage explained!
Do you ever sleep?

Share a little, Danny

LoL

That is a butt-load of boolets
 
Why do people BUY and then first thing want to "load them down". For pity sakes just buy a 38 and quit fooling your self.
Because there are a lot of really cool .357 revolvers out there, and not everyone wants to shoot full bore .357 Mag power all the time. In the big scheme of things I bet more .38 Spl factory ammo gets shot out of .357 revolvers than factory .357 Mag ammo. Who’s fooling who?
 
Why do people BUY and then first thing want to "load them down". For pity sakes just buy a 38 and quit fooling your self.

I ain't foolin' nobody! (But I did start shooting centerfires with a 3" 38).I bought 357 Revolvers 'cause I like revolvers, I like a powerful cartridge, but a reason high on the list is versatility. I have fired everything in my 357s from 148 gr. HBWC to 170 gr SWC, mostly cast bullets, but in the last year or so some JHPs too. Good powders run from Bullseye to H110. For range poppin' or "wife loads" I have used quite a few 125 gr RF cast over a light load of a fast powder. I can also load that bullet hot for some nice magnum loads. While I have waaaay more 38 Special brass handy, my upper loads are in magnum brass, but I have also used 38 Special data right out of my manuals in 357 brass (just remembering the velocity listed in the manual for the 38 will be higher than what I get with the same load in 357 brass). And I have used small pistol standard, small pistol magnum, small rifle and small rifle magnum primers, versatile. If I want/need to, I can grab some 38 Special ammo, or if needed and can find some, buy some, and go shooting, if I'm woods walking I'll use 357 Mag loads in one of my 4" revolvers (there is an occasional black bear and puma sighting in the hills out of town) and If I'm traveling I can load up some 38 +P SD loads, Just In Case. The only gun as versitile as the 357 Magnum, that I own, is the 44 Magnum

I just purchased a new Taurus 605 2" 357 Magnum but I've not been able the shoot it yet as the rain hasn't stopped long enough for the dirt road to dry out in the last 2 months, and there isn't an indoor range within 100 miles...

PS, I don't post load data on a forum mainly because I strongly recommend newer reloaders or those trying a new to them cartridge to ignore forum load data, my Rule #1...
 
Last edited:
True,

I stated that the search for more power (grunt, grunt, grunt) led to the cartridges, not lengthening of them brass.

The Colts existed because Colt refused to make a gun that was stamped S&W on the chambering. Even going so far as designating the .38 Colt New Police.

Even then designation of .38 Special chambering in a .357 is confusing or not known to many news shooters.

I can only imagine the confusion and or headache in trying to stock ammo. Cartridge nomenclature may or may not have any correlation
A .38 is a .358
A .41 is a .410
A .44 is a .429
A .45 is .452

UNLESS you are talking rifle cartridges....
Hey, I found a great book online for you: Cartridges Of The World, 8th Edition (1997) by Frank Barnes

Here's what he has about the .38's we've been talking about...

38 Smith & Wesson 38 Colt New Police

Historical Notes:

Designed by Smith & Wesson for their hinged-frame revolvers introduced about 1877, the 38 S&W is one of the more widely adopted American revolver cartridges; it has been used all over the world. England began using it as an official service cartridge prior to WWII, and it is rather well-distributed through the British Commonwealth. Large numbers of Spanish-made revolvers in this caliber are used in Mexico and South America, but it has never been very popular in Europe. It is also known as the 38 Colt New Police, and with a 200-grain bullet as the 38 Super Police. Colt, H&R, Hopkins & Allen, Iver Johnson, Ruger and S&W have made revolvers in this caliber in the U.S. Webley & Scott made many of the British service arms. The British service load is called the 380/200.

General Comments:

The 38 S&W is another cartridge that owes most of its popularity to the fact that it is well-suited to lightweight pocket guns. It is also a good short-range cartridge for defense use and has better stopping power than any of the 32s and even some of the larger automatic pistol cartridges. The British military figured out that the shocking power of this cartridge with a 200-grain bullet was about the same as their older 455 military cartridge. In actual combat this proved correct, thus permitted the use of fighter weapons. The 38 S&W is not a particularly satisfactory hunting cartridge because the curved trajectory limits its use to short ranges. However, it can be improved for hunting by handloading. Both Remington and Winchester still offer this cartridge with a 145-146-grain bullet.

---

38 Short & Long Colt

Historical Notes:

Obsolete for many years, the 38 Long Colt was once the official United States Army revolver cartridge, from 1892 to 1911. However, 38 Short Colt ammunition is commercially available and can be used in 38 Long Colt revolvers. It was used mainly in the Colt Army & Navy Model revolver with swing- out cylinder developed in 1887. The 38 Long Colt was actually introduced in 1875 as one of several calibers for the Colt New Line, New Police and New House revolvers. There is also a short version that is identical except for case length (.762-inch) and the fact that it used a 130-grain, outside-lubricated bullet at the same 770 fps muzzle velocity.

General Comments:

Since this was once a military cartridge, a number of Colt and S&W revolvers are still around in this caliber. The 38 Long Colt cartridge can be fired in a 38 Special revolver, but not vice versa. During the Spanish-American War and the Philippine insurrection, the Army found that the 38 Long

Colt had insufficient stopping power for combat use. The cartridge was therefore dropped, in 1911, in favor of the 45 ACP. It is this same experience that made the U.S. Army reluctant to adopt the 9mm Luger which they eventually did anyway, in 1985, largely as a NATO-inspired political decision. Advocates of a smaller caliber admit the superior stopping power of the 45, but point out that extra weight, reduced magazine capacity, and the fact that few men can shoot well with the 45 ACP are detrimental factors that should be considered. The 38 Long Colt is in about the same class as the standard 38 Special load, but not nearly as accurate or as versatile. Some of the old 38 Long Colt revolvers will accept 38 Special or 357 Magnum ammunition but never fire these in the old 38s. Firing the 357 Magnum would be particularly dangerous, probably wrecking the gun and possibly injuring the shooter or bystanders. Remington still manufactures 38 Short Colt ammunition, but 38 Long Colt is now obsolete.

---

NB: Since the time this was published in 1997, the .38 LC has gone back in to and out of production, mostly for “cowboy shooting” enthusiasts. It is still being made by Black Hills Ammunition.
 
You can add that there are a growing population of reloaders/tinkerers that load .38 SC and .38 LC cases with regular .38 special bullets for use in modern .38 special and .357 magnum revolvers. These are not true .38 SC/LC rounds, they are more like 38 Special Long/Short rounds.
 
I ain't foolin' nobody! (But I did start shooting centerfires with a 3" 38).I bought 357 Revolvers 'cause I like revolvers, I like a powerful cartridge, but a reason high on the list is versatility. I have fired everything in my 357s from 148 gr. HBWC to 170 gr SWC, mostly cast bullets, but in the last year or so some JHPs too. Good powders run from Bullseye to H110. For range poppin' or "wife loads" I have used quite a few 125 gr RF cast over a light load of a fast powder. I can also load that bullet hot for some nice magnum loads. While I have waaaay more 38 Special brass handy, my upper loads are in magnum brass, but I have also used 38 Special data right out of my manuals in 357 brass (just remembering the velocity listed in the manual for the 38 will be higher than what I get with the same load in 357 brass). And I have used small pistol standard, small pistol magnum, small rifle and small rifle magnum primers, versatile. If I want/need to, I can grab some 38 Special ammo, or if needed and can find some, buy some, and go shooting, if I'm woods walking I'll use 357 Mag loads in one of my 4" revolvers (there is an occasional black bear and puma sighting in the hills out of town) and If I'm traveling I can load up some 38 +P SD loads, Just In Case. The only gun as versitile as the 357 Magnum, that I own, is the 44 Magnum

I just purchased a new Taurus 605 2" 357 Magnum but I've not been able the shoot it yet as the rain hasn't stopped long enough for the dirt road to dry out in the last 2 months, and there isn't an indoor range within 100 miles...

PS, I don't post load data on a forum mainly because I strongly recommend newer reloaders or those trying a new to them cartridge to ignore forum load data, my Rule #1...
LOL!! My Rule #1 is, "Don't do what I do because it won't work for you. You do you and be the best you possible." :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdi
I guess I'm one of the few that dont think 357 loads are all that heavy. The top end is still fun while a 500sw is just punishment. I dont shoot hot loads a lot because I dont want to beat my pistol to death. I absolutely love the range available for loads, but I cant say the same cant be done in 41 or 44. The availability of free brass makes it a winner for sure.
 
I HAD a Cartridges of the World (not idea what edition, back in early 80s). Lost it on house fire in '83.

Heard that Ollie's had them or something similar, before Christmas. The Lawton store didn't have it.

The nomenclature is confusing, at best. I have seen 2 Wally sporting goods employees try to convince a customer that .44 Mag would would "just fine" in their .44 Special.

I had a Colt Thunderer .38 Colt Long, manufactured in 1883. A new .38 Special would chamber and they cylinder rotate. I loaded some .38 Specialty brass with FFFg and 102 gr cast bullets. Shot 6 rounds. Just too say I shot at. Kept it about 10 years and sold it.
Too old, no parts, afraid to shoot it too much; not worth having, to me.

I have down loaded .38 Special to use in CAS. Loaded some light enough, the bullet could be seen traveling to the target. So light, a couple didn't clear the 4.6" barrel. I upped the load 20% and marked it as "absolute minimum" in my book.
 
I HAD a Cartridges of the World (not idea what edition, back in early 80s). Lost it on house fire in '83.

Heard that Ollie's had them or something similar, before Christmas. The Lawton store didn't have it.

The nomenclature is confusing, at best. I have seen 2 Wally sporting goods employees try to convince a customer that .44 Mag would would "just fine" in their .44 Special.

I had a Colt Thunderer .38 Colt Long, manufactured in 1883. A new .38 Special would chamber and they cylinder rotate. I loaded some .38 Specialty brass with FFFg and 102 gr cast bullets. Shot 6 rounds. Just too say I shot at. Kept it about 10 years and sold it.
Too old, no parts, afraid to shoot it too much; not worth having, to me.

I have down loaded .38 Special to use in CAS. Loaded some light enough, the bullet could be seen traveling to the target. So light, a couple didn't clear the 4.6" barrel. I upped the load 20% and marked it as "absolute minimum" in my book.
I think one of the IDPA guys (or is it USPSA?) on here said he uses .38SC cases to load for competitions. IIRC, it's a not "hot" load for the case. Seems to be kinda a thang. Anyway, cool that the .38 Long Colt predates the .38S&W by two years. Typically the rant from the peanut gallery is, S&W invented guns and Colt stole the idea. ;)
 
You can add that there are a growing population of reloaders/tinkerers that load .38 SC and .38 LC cases with regular .38 special bullets for use in modern .38 special and .357 magnum revolvers. These are not true .38 SC/LC rounds, they are more like 38 Special Long/Short rounds.

That's basically true; checked my Star brass in 38 short, 38 Long, 38 special and 357 magnum and has far as I can tell all the same just different length.
 
Lead and primer shortage explained!
Do you ever sleep?

Share a little, Danny

LoL

That is a butt-load of boolets

That's over 32 years; I had a guy blow up his gun when I was just starting, so I kept detailed notes all these years. With everything I have loaded Rifle, Shotgun and Pistol the numbers is 185,900. :)
 
Last edited:
I think one of the IDPA guys (or is it USPSA?) on here said he uses .38SC cases to load for competitions. IIRC, it's a not "hot" load for the case. Seems to be kinda a thang. Anyway, cool that the .38 Long Colt predates the .38S&W by two years. Typically the rant from the peanut gallery is, S&W invented guns and Colt stole the idea. ;)

For CAS, it boils down to gamers gaming. Less recoil to gain speed. All that is required OS a "hit" on a gong at 7-10 yards. No power factor, just has to be centerfire. Many are using .32 H&R Rugers, loaded down to mouse farts.

I have .357 Ruger Blackhawks, go to a CAS. I asked one the "shooters" about this "birdheads", I had considered getting some. He pulls out, "they are .32 H&R, with action job, to enhance speed"
Very nice.
Then he says, "your Blackhawks aren't legal for National Matches, they aren't authentic."

"Oh, but I guess your STAINLESS, transfer bar, .32 H&R Magnums ARE authentic?"

I prefer adjustable sights, the larger Blackhawk frame and I shoot for fun. I have no intention of going to a National Matches. My age and arthritis have removed me from contention. I have found more enjoyment and friends, in those who shoot for fun (looking to maintain or improve themselves, not compare to others).
Our Cowboy shoots are local matches, 1 National Matches a year. Normally, 16-22 shooters. 6-10 are there for fun. We talk, joke, trade loads, compare equipment (what works and doesnt). The "others" keep to themselves, don't speak, argue rules, times, hits, and misses. What is the fun? There are a couple, of they aren't the fastest on the stage or overall; leave mad. 2nd is the 1st loser.
Gamers gonna game. If you want to compete, go for it.
On the other side, 85yo guy, always the first one at the range. Greeted everyone when they arrived. Was usually the slowest, but rarely missed. Quick to loan equipment or offer ammo, if anyone had problems. Just a joy to be around. He passed away, 3 years ago, on the range, between Stage 3 and Stage 4. Outside, doing what he loved, wearing his 6 guns, boots and hat, surrounded by like minded friends. I feel like he left this world how he wanted to go.
I should be so lucky.
 
Last edited:
My EDC revolver is getting kind of old, and was never the strongest .357 out there. My carry loads for the gun are backed down a few percent from maximum, which makes them easier on the gun, easier on my hands, and easier on my ears. So that's one reason to seek out "less-than-maximum" loads for the cartridge.

By the same token, I don't see much point in shooting many hundreds of carry loads during routine practice, so use very lightly loaded wadcutters for 80 or 90 percent of my shooting, and finishing with a handful of carry loads to maintain familiarity.

And yes, the latter purpose - and perhaps even the former - could be fulfilled with .38 Specials, but then I'd need to scrub out the chambers all the time. Using .357 brass just makes sense.
 
My EDC revolver is getting kind of old, and was never the strongest .357 out there. My carry loads for the gun are backed down a few percent from maximum, which makes them easier on the gun, easier on my hands, and easier on my ears. So that's one reason to seek out "less-than-maximum" loads for the cartridge.

By the same token, I don't see much point in shooting many hundreds of carry loads during routine practice, so use very lightly loaded wadcutters for 80 or 90 percent of my shooting, and finishing with a handful of carry loads to maintain familiarity.

And yes, the latter purpose - and perhaps even the former - could be fulfilled with .38 Specials, but then I'd need to scrub out the chambers all the time. Using .357 brass just makes sense.

And having to separate the brass.
I HAD a lot of .38 brass, I HAD a S&W Model 60 .38. It was stolen.
It was replaced with a .357. After shooting both Spl and Mag loads, I slowly eliminated/sold/traded the Spl brass and use Magnum brass only.
 
These are the bullets I cast for 38/357; starting on the left 115 gain to 200 gain on the right.

View attachment 1050009


I have powder coated 95gr and 102gr. Fun to shoot. Those 95gr really scream with 7.8gr Unique. The 102gr are purple, loaded in nickel cases, with 2.4gr Trail Boss, for granddaughters to shoot with. They love the purple and low noise, negligible recoil. Whatever it takes to get their interest.


Using different powder coated colors allows me quick ID of loads. 180gr hunting loads are red. 125gr white. 158gr are lime green. 95gr are blue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top