Micro', I read it more as Loosed' did, with him no disputing that it exists, nor even that it could be highly effective, but that it is unreliable. FWIW, and I am very far from an expert, I tend to think that sounds about right.
Which would suggest trying to get adequate (plus a little margin) penetration, then trying to get the highest chance of hydrostatic shock you can. In other words, don't accept inadequate penetration chasing shock, but if you've got penetration to spare, trying to get the chance of shock from 5% to 15% is alright.
Which would suggest trying to get adequate (plus a little margin) penetration, then trying to get the highest chance of hydrostatic shock you can. In other words, don't accept inadequate penetration chasing shock, but if you've got penetration to spare, trying to get the chance of shock from 5% to 15% is alright.