.380 defense loads

Which is better? Hornady Critical Defense .380, or Federal Hydrashock .380?

  • Federal Hydrashock

    Votes: 10 15.9%
  • Hornady Critical Defense

    Votes: 17 27.0%
  • Both are equally good

    Votes: 22 34.9%
  • I don't know/don't care

    Votes: 14 22.2%

  • Total voters
    63
Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
May 19, 2008
Messages
391
My sister just got a new Bersa .380 for her nightstand, and was lucky enough to find ammo. Both Federal Hydrashock and Hornady Critical Defense ammo work well in her gun, but she asked my opinion on which one might be better in case she ever had to use it. I told her honestly that I didn't know, but now I'm curious.

Anyone here have thoughts on the matter? Which round would be better suited for close-range defense in order to stop an attacker. Or are they equally good?
 
From what i was reading, the Hornady round was designed so that clothing on the BG doesn't get caught and clog the hollowpoint, hence the plastic insert in the nose of the round. Is there any merit to this? Is the little post inside the hydrashock round likely to get fabric caught on it and decrease effectiveness?
 
Hydrashoks have a decent track record, Hornady's may be new and improved but there hasn't been enough law enforcement shootings with them to determine actual performance. Likely they both will work equally well.
 
I prefer the Remington 100gr golden sabre, but of the 2 listed I would put my money on the Hornaday first. Actually buy both see which shoots the best, or has the best availability in your area... could be any delay to purchase could make for bare shelves.
 
+1 on the 102gr Remington Golden Sabers. They cycle perfectly every time and have never FTF. They open to about 5/8th's inch at 8inches.
 
standard Hydrashock pretty much sucks...wait let me think...yeah, I was right the first time, it sucks. Packs up too easily in clothing, is not loaded very hot compared to other brands, and it usually comes apart pretty easily. On the up side it is usually pretty accurate and generally reliable. Three words Corbon Power Ball. I've tried it and it works well. Don't know anything about the hornady critical defense so I couldn't say.
 
I second JimKirk, when I had my P3AT I did extensive ballistic testing of my own with several different loads. That Corbon DPX with the solid copper bullet was the only one I had any faith in, good 1000+ velocity and those solid copper bullets penetrate much farther than a comparable lead core bullet.
 
I vote neither

The CorBon 90gr load or the Corbon 80gr Barnes DPX. Those would be the first place that I would start.
 
I have a box of the CorBon PowRBalls... Seemed like the best idea for my Bersa, it didn't seem to like flat nosed bullets/hollowpoints. Had to find a HP with a plastic ball to round it out for feeding purposes.
 
I have a box of the CorBon PowRBalls...

Looks like it may be time to switch ammo if what I'm seeing at sidheshooter's link holds true for me when I test it the same way. I really thought the PowRballs would perform better.
 
Well I've been carrying the Remington Golden Saber 102gr in my Ruger LCP, which is the only 380 I currently own. This tested best in the wet pack tests in mouseguns.com link above. It also feeds well. I wonder, however, if it would expand as well out of my LCP's short barrel and the consequent velocity loss. Maybe the lighter and faster Corbon DPX 80gr all copper bullet would be a better choice in the LCP?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top