Yositomo Wiskisito
Member
Good morning. I'm new to the forum.
This topic might be beaten to a pulp but I've been away from the handgun scene for the last 15 to 20 years, including the .40 S&W, .357 Sig and other cartridge and ammunition developments.
I recently bought a HK USPc .40 to replace my "old" guns and use as a CCW. I know that how the ammo cycles in the weapon, shot placement and practice matters much more than caliber, brands of ammunition, weight, ext. but I still find it perplexing that after 20 years the industry is still debating weather light and fast or heavy and slow. To be completely honest, after reading about the caliber I'm more confused as the trend started heavy and slow(180 gr.), became light and fast (135 gr.)and now seems to be gradually swinging back to the 180'sgr. bullets (155, 165 & 180). Mix in the topic a 3.5 inch barrel and I feel like Hansel & Gretel in the forest.
Can anyone provide information as to the most effective bullet weight for a .40S&W handgun with a 3.5 barrel? Thank you
This topic might be beaten to a pulp but I've been away from the handgun scene for the last 15 to 20 years, including the .40 S&W, .357 Sig and other cartridge and ammunition developments.
I recently bought a HK USPc .40 to replace my "old" guns and use as a CCW. I know that how the ammo cycles in the weapon, shot placement and practice matters much more than caliber, brands of ammunition, weight, ext. but I still find it perplexing that after 20 years the industry is still debating weather light and fast or heavy and slow. To be completely honest, after reading about the caliber I'm more confused as the trend started heavy and slow(180 gr.), became light and fast (135 gr.)and now seems to be gradually swinging back to the 180'sgr. bullets (155, 165 & 180). Mix in the topic a 3.5 inch barrel and I feel like Hansel & Gretel in the forest.
Can anyone provide information as to the most effective bullet weight for a .40S&W handgun with a 3.5 barrel? Thank you