Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

4473 Changing

Discussion in 'General Gun Discussions' started by Bubbles, Jan 10, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Bubbles

    Bubbles Member

    Joined:
    Apr 26, 2004
    Messages:
    3,152
    Location:
    Eastern Panhandle of West Virginia
  2. firesky101

    firesky101 Member

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2011
    Messages:
    1,433
    Location:
    California
    My tablet wont download that for some reason. What did they change? I always joked with my lgs that it should say caucasian not white, how offensive.
     
  3. mp510

    mp510 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 13, 2006
    Messages:
    3,045
    Location:
    PRKt
    They added a question asking the purchaser to identify himself as Hispanic (or Not) followed by a seperate racial identification question, the options for which no longer include Hispanic/ Latino. They also added a question for NIA purchasers to check-off thier exemption catagory (hunting license, sporting invite, AG Exemption).
     
  4. CoRoMo

    CoRoMo Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2007
    Messages:
    8,940
    Location:
    Californicated Colorado
    So do you dealers have to chunk all the blank 4473s that you're sitting on and order new ones? Or does the ATF give you the option to run out of what you've got before changing to the new ones?
     
  5. TexasRifleman

    TexasRifleman Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    18,302
    Location:
    Ft. Worth
    What a strange question.

    "10.a. Ethnicity

    Hispanic or Latino

    Not Hispanic or Latino"

    Anyone have the foggiest idea what that's for?
     
  6. BP Hunter

    BP Hunter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2006
    Messages:
    1,514
    Location:
    WA
    Why would theATF care if the buyer was a Hispanic or not? Hmmm...
     
  7. MtnCreek

    MtnCreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    3,954
    Location:
    West GA
    The same reason they care how tall you are and what your weight is...
     
  8. TexasRifleman

    TexasRifleman Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    18,302
    Location:
    Ft. Worth
    Yes but why move it from the "Race" section to "Ethnicity". Is there some political correctness thing here I am not familiar with?
     
  9. ErikO

    ErikO Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2011
    Messages:
    517
    Location:
    Eastern Missouri
    I'd be happier about the 'race' question if 'human' became the only choice. Honestly, that data is what the census is for.
     
  10. MtnCreek

    MtnCreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    3,954
    Location:
    West GA
    Some hispanics get really pissed if you refer to them as anything other than white. I'm not kidding.
     
  11. ball3006

    ball3006 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2002
    Messages:
    2,874
    Location:
    Texas
    A form I filled out for the VA had the same question...............chris3
     
  12. LibShooter

    LibShooter Member

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2008
    Messages:
    776
    Location:
    East Tennessee
    There has been confusion among folks filling out forms as to whether "Latinoness" is a racial or ethnic trait. Many folks of Hispanic ethnicity also self identify as white.

    I read somewhere that these questions in this order are the best way to get accurate reporting. You will probably see them on other government forms in the future.
     
  13. Stevie-Ray

    Stevie-Ray Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2003
    Messages:
    4,074
    Location:
    Mitchi-gun, the Sunrise Side
    I thought Hispanics were considered "brown."
     
  14. Shadow 7D

    Shadow 7D Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2008
    Messages:
    7,005
    Location:
    Frozen North
    Um, yeah, you nailed it, many are descended (or claim to be) from white Spaniard
    but other descend from from black slaves (yeah, Latin countries have race issues TOO)
    and still others from the Indians

    and many are mixed, but we won't get into that, as depends on region / ethnicity what it's called.
     
  15. MtnCreek

    MtnCreek Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2010
    Messages:
    3,954
    Location:
    West GA
    Depending on who's asking, sometimes I check all the boxes.:)
     
  16. FIVETWOSEVEN

    FIVETWOSEVEN Member

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,057
    I've wondered myself every time I see that question.
     
  17. Zoogster

    Zoogster Member

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    5,091
    Racial simplification is a bunch of crap anyways.

    If you research European history you will find a large percentage of Europeans are mixed with 'black' African, middle eastern (themselves a big mix), and Asian ancestry.
    From all the mixing during trade and various wars.
    Notable large incidents including mixing with the hordes of Ghengis Khan,


    Take a look at ancient paintaings and sculptures of Romans and Greeks, nothing like Romans and Greeks today. From color, to bone structure to hair, the genetics are very different.
    This goes back to Roman slave days, the Romans were racist, and wouldn't mix with others originally, but in later times mixed with most of their slaves.
    They then mixed with various cultures and armies that conquered the region over time, as well as through trade.

    The French or Gaul was predominantly fair skin and hair, Celtic.
    Hispania or modern Spain was much the same.
    Looking more Nordic than they do today.
    Yet today are predominantly black haired people of many complexions.
    This goes back to the Moorish conquest, when people of black African and Arabs ruled over and mixed with modern day Spain, and France.

    Before modern times wars tended to mix populations a lot more too.
    From marriages, to rape and prostitution, most nations at war with armies that marched over long distances and 'lived off the land' (raped and pillaged) mixed genes.

    Most of Africa was colonized, their genes have a large percentage of European ancestry since now, even if they are quite 'black' in skin color.
    Just as most US blacks today, many of whom have European bone structure and are more European than African, yet are 'black' or 'African American'.



    And that does not even touch the surface.
    My point is that 'white' is already meaningless.
    Black is relatively meaningless.
    And if you go south of the border, the mixture is so massive, it is hard to even categorize.
    Mexico was the melting pot long before the USA. From the large number of Natives, to the massive importation of African slaves, to often unrealized but large immigration of Asian immigrants. On top of the Spanish blood.
    They call it 'Mestizo' to be mixed, and most of the population is mestizo.
    Most who don't think they are just don't know enough of their history to go back far enough.




    Genetics play a very large role in many things, but they are so much more complex than the simplification of 'race' as it is known in the US.
    Most people don't really want to hear the truth though.
     
  18. Birch Knoll

    Birch Knoll Member

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2011
    Messages:
    943
    Location:
    China, ME
    Because race and ethnicity are two different things. Once may be either white or black as well as either Hispanic or non-Hispanic.
     
  19. Strykervet

    Strykervet member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,610
    Uh, nobody for "Fast and Furious"? Much easier to racially profile an individual that way.

    Now, race is what you ARE. You can't change it, you were born with it. Ethnicity is HOW you are, after you were born ethnicity was taught by family and, more importantly, the whole community. The food, the art, the customs, this is ethnicity. "Jew" is ethnicity for example, and not a race.

    If you consider an individual that is by blood hispanic, but raised say in an upscale white neighborhood and goes to school at a private school with rich white kids and the family is whitebread American, then that person is ETHNICALLY different from the guy who grew up in SoCal in a "hispanic" neighborhood and practiced, say, Mexican culture instead.

    But what about all the other cultures? Is "A" in ATF for anthropology now? What if the parents got divorced and the kid grew up with equal amounts of time in both cultures and identifies with both equally? What if he checks both? God help us.

    It seems to me to be a very blunt and not very well thought out way of separating "Mexicans who identify as Americans" from "Mexicans who identify as Mexicans". Because lets be honest, this has little to do with "hispanic" which includes everything south of Texas. But putting "Mexican" on the form might be considered racist. This is just a politically correct way of asking, "Do you identify with Mexican culture in daily life?"

    The question seems to play on one's feeling towards culture. You may not be proud of your race for whatever reason, but rarely is one NOT proud of their culture or ethnicity. In fact, just the opposite. For instance, I'm proud of my Native descent, what little I know of it.

    So, if you can weed out the folks that identify as American from the ones that identify as hispanic (or Mexican, because that is what it is really all about, right?) then it makes racially profiling easier. Now you don't have to root through info on "American Mexicans", instead, focus on "Mexican Americans". Get it?

    That is my take.
     
  20. TexasRifleman

    TexasRifleman Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    18,302
    Location:
    Ft. Worth
    Well it's a very interesting discussion, I've learned a lot, thanks.

    But, since it's just barely on topic, and the questions seem answered, let's stop now.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page