Catpop
Member
Murf, that is a possibility but I don’t think so.
no, shaving lead and the shavings causing the leading.Are you suggesting he may be over crimping and reducing the diameter of the bullet?
I have Sig 1911, M&P45 and PT145 ... PT145 has oversized bore (.453"+ groove diameter)
PT145 groove diameter is larger than your barrel yet 12 BHN MBC 200 gr SWC (Bullseye #1) sized .452" eliminated the leading issue. Key is using fast burning powders with high enough powder charge for the initial "thump" deformation of bullet base to seal with the bore. I seat and crimp in the same step and use minimal taper crimp so case mouth can seal with the chamber faster (I use .473" taper crimp which will still "plonk" in the tight Sig 1911 chamber with no leade).My bore is .4527 which is why it tends to lead with .452 boolits. .453 did better.
Key is using fast burning powders with high enough powder charge for the initial "thump" deformation of bullet base to seal with the bore
.002 oversize meaning .353? What did your barrel slug?They are .002 oversize and no harder than 12bhn
I'm thinking if this is fitting you must be swaging the bullets down while loading. That is huge and would be close to not fitting in my Blackhawk in 45 coltI loaded up one .454 to test. I was surprised it passed plunk test. If .453 doesn’t work, I’m on to .454.
Thanks to all