.480 on midframe?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Delawarean

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2013
Messages
93
Location
Delaware
I'm wanting a revolver for hunting deer here in DE but our minimum barrel length is 5 3/4" :cuss: That means both the .357 NV I have and the .44 flattop I was thinking about buying are out, so I've decided I may go the custom route. First was just thinking a nice .44 Special but at work today I was thinking a 5-shot .480 would be cool if it was on the midframe. The larger SA frame is too big IMO.


So the question: Is it possible to have a .480 Ruger 5-shot midframe (New Vaquero/flattop size)?
 
I stand corrected, I just didn't think the frame would withstand the thrust that the heavier 480 loads would produce.
 
The frame is not the weak link.

Cylinder wall thickness over the tops of the chambers is.
IMO: It would have to be a 5-shot cylinder to put the locking bolt cuts between chambers.

rc
 
I stand corrected, I just didn't think the frame would withstand the thrust that the heavier 480 loads would produce.
If asked, I would've agreed until I saw that they were building them. I wouldn't have expected there to be enough meat left to contain the 48,000psi cartridge, even with a custom oversized 5-shot cylinder and opened-up frame window. Several `smith's won't do them like Bowen and Clements. I know that Clements will do them into a .500S&W cut to .44Spl length but those are held to rather sedate pressures and around 800fps.
 
Why are you trying to limit yourself to mid-frame sizes? Are you planning on carrying a long gun too?
 
The frame is not the weak link.

Cylinder wall thickness over the tops of the chambers is.
IMO: It would have to be a 5-shot cylinder to put the locking bolt cuts between chambers.
I knew Cylinder wall thickness wouldn't be a problem the window is easily big enough for a 5 shot 480 cylinder to have plenty of wall thickness.
The thinner top strap is going to be the weak link in this equasion.
I'll still bet a soda my favorite 480 load causes endshake with a steady diet. There's a reason Clement's and Bowen don't do it. I wonder if Jack reccomends some kind of limit?
 
I wonder if Jack reccomends some kind of limit?
I really don't know. You can certainly call Jack and ask him. I talked to him about doing my .500 and he seems like a really nice guy. I would probably limit my loads to 1000fps because maximum loads are not really what it's about.

I know that Bowen tends to be overly cautious. Clements probably doesn't want to test fire the thing with full loads. I wouldn't, unless it was a Bisley like the one in the link. I seriously doubt there's a problem with the frame, for its size it's pretty hefty. Remember a .44Spl mid-frame is only very slightly lighter than a comparable SBH. These are still very beefy little sixguns.
 
Remember a .44Spl mid-frame is only very slightly lighter than a comparable SBH. These are still very beefy little sixguns.
True enough. I doubt any one would shoot that many rounds out of one anyway. My 5 1/4" BFR is a good bit heavier and I don't like shooting more than a few rounds through it at one time.
I agree it would be a handy little beast. Not sure it's worth messing up a perfectly good 44 Special, but it ain't my money either.
 
No but it might be a good fate for a 50th anniversary .357! ;)

If I was gonna go to the expense of a custom five-shot mid-frame, it would have to be a 4" .500Spl and 700-900fps would be just fine.
 
No but it might be a good fate for a 50th anniversary .357!
Not mine but I like my .357s too, but that wouldn't bother me.
If I was gonna go to the expense of a custom five-shot mid-frame, it would have to be a 4" .500Spl and 700-900fps would be just fine.
That'd be a good one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top