Autolycus
Member
I just like my 9mm to be good old fashioned 9mm.
"si vis pacem, para bellum"Not exactly. During the last part of WWII, Germany was running out of basic components – lead, for example. They started using ‘sintered’ (compressed or MIM) mild steel bullets in 9mm Parabellum ammo. Those bullets were lighter than the standard lead core bullets. In order to produce the standard pressure, the charges were adjusted (jacked up) to make the guns work. So the lighter bullet going faster was thought of as ‘hotter’. It was the same pressure as the regular lead core ammo. Which is somewhat higher than the ammo loaded in the U. S.
Some U. S. munitions makers started manufacturing 9mm ‘Lugar’ ammo (don’t know why they changed the name, but marketing has always been a mystery to me) for the British Army to use in Sten submachinguns. U. S. munitions makers seem to be a conservative bunch and the pressure levels were keep at minimal ranges, to not blow up anything. The result being the ammo would not correctly work the Sten gun; it would not always move the bolt far enough to the rear to engage the sear when the trigger was released. This caused the Sten guns to continue to fire until the magazine was empty. This in turn caused the British Army to mark the ammo “Not for submachinegun use”. This information trickled back to the U. S. but was garbled into the myth ‘submachinegun ammo’ was more powerful and would destroy American handguns.
Think about this for a moment: Would any government load a ‘special lot’ of any ammunition that would destroy some guns? Proof test ammo is not general issue. ‘Sabotage’ ammo left for insurgents to blow themselves up is not general issue. No Army every knowingly issued ammo to its own troops dangerous to be fired.
The same sort thing happened in the U. S. .357 Magnum ammo used to be loaded with 158 grain bullets. In the 1970s or so, Federal (I think) picked up on Lee Jurras’ idea of ‘SuperVel’ ammo and developed a 115 grain bullet at very high velocity in the .357 Magnum. This ammo would sometimes crack the forcing cones of S&W “K” frame model 19 revolvers. The ammo was still loaded to the same maximum pressure levels; but the stress on the barrel was different. Still, this lead to the belief the 115 grain ammo was ‘hotter’; generated more pressure. Does that sound familiar?
Okay, European ammo has always been loaded to higher pressure levels than the equivalent U. S. ammo. U. S. made 8x57 Mauser ammo is weaker than the European versions. Even .38 Special is loaded stronger in Europe. Europe (at least used to) thinks if you put modern ammo in an old gun and blow yourself up, you’re a dummy. It’s probably changing. Still European ammo will not ‘blow up’ a properly made American gun. It might wear out faster, but it won’t explode.
$4 per 100 rounds in 1952. That sounds really expensive. What is that in today's dollars?
Nah. Use a 7.72X25!This is the thread that refuses to die. KILL IT. KILL IT WITH FIRE.
I can do thatThis is the thread that refuses to die. KILL IT. KILL IT WITH FIRE.