spiroxlii
Member
I didn't start out as a gun toting 2A activist. I started out as a casual shooter and milsurp collector. I think my roots as a Cruffler (C&R FFL holder) had a profound effect on the way I shopped for a carry pistol.
When you spend most of your time looking at cosmoline-caked, dark-bored, beaver-chewed, and blood-stained battle rifles, your definition of "good condition" tends to be rather generous. You start to value wear marks and scratches because they give a gun character. The only thing that really and truly matters is reliability.
When I saw my Bersa in the case, it was $50 less than the Bersas around it. Why? It has marks from holster wear. The bore was bright. Everything worked properly. I didn't care if it wasn't the prettiest of its bretheren. It had more character than the others, and for all its "flaws," it was still about a hundred times less beat up than my SMLE.
My reward? A straight-shooting reliable pistol for considerably less money than a "prettier" example of the same gun.
When you spend most of your time looking at cosmoline-caked, dark-bored, beaver-chewed, and blood-stained battle rifles, your definition of "good condition" tends to be rather generous. You start to value wear marks and scratches because they give a gun character. The only thing that really and truly matters is reliability.
When I saw my Bersa in the case, it was $50 less than the Bersas around it. Why? It has marks from holster wear. The bore was bright. Everything worked properly. I didn't care if it wasn't the prettiest of its bretheren. It had more character than the others, and for all its "flaws," it was still about a hundred times less beat up than my SMLE.
My reward? A straight-shooting reliable pistol for considerably less money than a "prettier" example of the same gun.