Alan Keyes on gun control

Status
Not open for further replies.

jsalcedo

Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2002
Messages
3,683
http://www.issues2000.org/2000/Alan_Keyes_Gun_Control.htm

Alan Keyes on Gun Control



No federal role in gun safety-leave it to states & parents
Q: What do you propose to protect children from injury or death from firearms?
A: There is almost no proper federal role in the area of firearms safety. Legislation concerning responsibility for negligence has traditionally, and properly, fallen to the states. Irresponsibility of parents with regard to firearms is part of the question of the general responsibility, or lack thereof, of parents. As a people, we must honor and foster a recovery of personal and political self-government.
Source: National Association of Children’s Hospitals survey Jan 8, 2000

Teach high school students to use guns
Speaking at the Gun Owners of New Hampshire’s presidential forum, Keyes’ proposal that high school students be taught how to use guns went over well.
Source: Boston Globe, p. A23 Dec 17, 1999

Columbine killers lacked moral development - not gun laws
The gun control mentality is that guns are in control of situations, and when we see kids like those in Columbine High School, we shouldn’t see human beings who have gone off the right moral road because their consciences and self-discipline have not been properly developed. Instead, we should see guns in control of the situation, and then we should react against the guns. “Gun violence†should be called human violence, leaving us at least the dignity of being responsible for our own sins.
Source: (Cross-ref from Juvenile Crime) WorldNetDaily “Standing on p Jun 14, 1999

Gun control is an outcome of godless materialism
The premise of the gun control agenda is that people can’t control things, but that things control people. At the root of the gun control agenda, as with the sex education agenda and so many other liberal agendas, is a denial of our moral nature. And that denial of our moral nature rests ultimately on a denial of the existence of God and of a relationship between God and human things. So the gun control agenda is a natural outcome of the agenda of godless materialism.
Source: WorldNetDaily “Standing on principle†May 14, 1999

Control people’s passions - not the things they use
[Gun control proponents] propose controlling the things we use, as if this will control people. Violence is not a function of the things; it’s a function of the heart. If the heart is wrong, then violence will come out of the heart as a consequence -- and if a gun isn’t handy, a machete will do. What is in control is not the thing, but the human being that allows his evil passions to control his actions, and thus lead to the awful situations we have seen from Indonesia to Littleton.
Source: WorldNetDaily “Standing on principle†May 14, 1999

Against banning guns since that won’t end violence.
Consider the phony assertion that certain weapons should be banned because “they have no purpose except to kill people.†This debate is not about certain kinds of weapons that kill people; all kinds of weapons can kill. It is people that kill people, and they can use countless kinds of weapons to do so, if killing is in their hearts. If we want to end violence in our land, we must warm the hearts of this people with a renewed dedication to the God-given equality of all human beings.
Source: www.keyes2000.org/issues/secondamendment.html 1/7/99 Jan 7, 1999

Supports right to bear arms for all types and uses of guns.
The 2nd Amendment was not put into the Constitution by the Founders merely to allow us to intimidate burglars, or hunt rabbits to our hearts’ content. The Founders added the 2nd Amendment so that when, after a long train of abuses, a government evinces a methodical design upon our natural rights, we will have the means to protect and recover our rights. That is why the right to keep and bear arms was included in the Bill of Rights.
Source: www.keyes2000.org/issues/secondamendment.html 1/7/99 Jan 7, 1999

No bans on legal firearms; allow concealed carry
Eliminate all bans and measures that restrict law-abiding citizens from owning legally obtained firearms; Allow law-abiding citizens to carry a concealed firearm that is legally owned and registered.
 
Keyes is a great public speaker, and a true take-no-prisoners conservative. He has never gotten the recognition that he deserves.

FWIW,

emc
 
Keyes should be on the Republican ticket as VP this year. I was hoping last time around, but since I don't think Cheny has a chance to be elected pres, I would like to see someone like Keyes in the pipeline.
 
Alan Keyes is a true conservative and gun owner.

The media ignores him.
 
Yeah!

When I voted last week in the CA primary,instead of voting for Bush I wrote in ALAN KEYES!! /
...I figured a little protest of Bush was in order,when AWB susets Bush gets a check from me though.
 
Even back when I was younger and stupid (read: more liberal) I still wanted that man for president.

Keyes in '04! '08!!!
 
I suspect that Dr. Keyes is not given as much weight because he is 1). not caucasian 2). married to a woman of Indian descent (dots, not feathers) and 3). is lately supporting a very (VERY) conservative Christian stance.

And what of that makes any difference to me as a measure of his character? Not a bit. I fully respect the man and would once again give him my full support in a run for a national office.

What about Keyes/Rice in '08?

Regards,
Rabbit.
 
Last edited:
Keyes is too honest, too consistent in his views to appeal to any political party that had a chance of winning. The press guys would ask him a loaded question, and he would answer it straight. No way the Republican party could handle that, they barely tolerate Ron Paul, and only because they can't figure out a way to get rid of him, the way the voters keep voting for him!

Keyes should aim a little lower, a governor-ship maybe? Like Jesse Ventura. How the mainstream politicos hated him.
 
He said something similar in a TV interview, but replaced "registered" with "legally purchased"

I think it comes from the common misconception that guns HAVE to be registered.
 
Sylvilagus,

the bit about Keyes' race and marriage is, with all due respect, so much Leftist victim-mongering crap, and if you told Keyes that he'd dope-slap you.

The fact is that the man is deeply conservative and is completely frank about it, e.g. he's not political enough to be politically viable. Nothing to do with his color. Same thing happened to Pat Buchanan, who made (and makes) no bones about his beliefs. Although I don't agree with much of ol' Pat's thinking, especially lately, I must admit he was the most honest man in the race at the time.
 
The Republican leadership really don't like Keyes. I mean, REALLY doesn't like him. As in, he tried to show up at one of the Presidential primary debates, (In '96) and they had him dragged off in handcuffs.

Politicians who actually have principles make the people running the major parties really nervous...
 
I always have admired Keyes and my admiration just went up about 5 notches.

The guy makes so much sense. No wonder he only pulls single digits when he runs for national office. I'd LOVE it if he'd start a radio talk show.
 
I sat next to Alan Keyes at one of his speaking engagements. Part of our discussion revolved around the fact that conscience driven voting demands that you pick a loser.

I might follow some of your examples and write him in this year.

Richardson
 
Funny you guys should mention Keyes/Rice as a Pres/VP combo. I mentioned the same thing to a friend of mine a few weeks ago.

I'd vote for them repeatedly, in a heartbeat. Heck, I've said for the past decade or more that I'd like to see Keyes become president.

Chris
 
I voted for him in the 2000 primary, even though I figured he didn't have a chance. You guys are exactly right about him being too consistent for the big parties.
 
Khornet, I agree with you. I was recounting my opinion as to why I think he hasn't gotten a fair shake in the national spotlight. His race (and for that matter, anyone's race) make precious little difference to me. In my book, he's an American. That's where my criteria is. We're red white and blue.

If nothing else, he could be groomed in another high-ranking diplomatic or Cabinet position where his talents and expertise would be of valuable service to the country...until his hat goes back in the ring.

I wish his cable talk show was still on.

<edited to add>
I believe that he has true concern in his soul for what is correct for the country and the act of 'being political' in order to subjugate 'what is right' for 'what can be done' just is not in the man. I get the feeling that he couldn't subvert truth for politics. He has too much character for that.

Regards,
Rabbit.
 
Yes, mtnbkr...

Alan Keyes spent 11 years with the U.S. State Department. He served in the U.S. Foreign Service and on the staff of the National Security Council before becoming Ronald Reagan's ambassador to the United Nations Economic and Social Council, where he represented the interests of the United States in the U.N. General Assembly (1983-85). In 1985, he was appointed Assistant Secretary of State for International Organizations (1985-88).

...from http://www.renewamerica.us/keyes/whois.htm

Smart man. Among other accomplishments.

Regards,
Rabbit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top