Quantcast
  1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Alito must be worse than we think...

Discussion in 'Legal' started by Lone_Gunman, Jan 15, 2006.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    Because Feinstein doesn't want to filibuster his nomination.

    http://news.yahoo.com/fc/US/Supreme_Court

    I think I would have liked him better if Feinstein, Kennedy, Shumer, and Kerry had wanted to filibuster him.
     
  2. taliv

    taliv Moderator

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2004
    Messages:
    22,064
    if bush nominated feinstein herself, the dems would make the same accusations
     
  3. Lobotomy Boy

    Lobotomy Boy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,449
    There's not a damned thing the Democrats can say about Alito without looking like complete hypocrites. Of course almost all politicians are complete hypocrites, but the point is to try not to look like one.
     
  4. TexasRifleman

    TexasRifleman Moderator Emeritus

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2003
    Messages:
    18,302
    Location:
    Ft. Worth

    She knows it wouldn't do any good in the long run. She may be a psychotic lunatic, but one that's VERY good at playing the politics game. She'll save that for something really juicy.
     
  5. Jeff White

    Jeff White Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    19,196
    Location:
    Alma Illinois
    I think they are publically calling on other members not to attempt a fillibuster to make themselves look more moderate. This is all posturing, the hearings, the whole works. Kennedy, Shumer and company made a public spectacle of themselves that didn't play well with anyone but the radical left during the hearings. It was all over for them with the middle when Judge Alito's wife left the hearing in tears and Schumer went on TV defending the kind of questioning that provoked that response from her.

    They know they don't have the votes to make a fillibuster work, any attempt would just make them look more impotent and like spoilt little children. So by making this statement DiFi is distancing herself from the line of questioning at the hearings. I have no doubt that if they thought they could stop the nomination, they would fillibuster.

    Jeff
     
  6. beerslurpy

    beerslurpy member

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    4,438
    Location:
    Spring Hill, Florida
    Winner! Yeah, the democrats tried their best and it backfired. They recognize that the only way forward is to retreat or get more embarassed so they have chosen the less embarassing route.
     
  7. Lobotomy Boy

    Lobotomy Boy Member

    Joined:
    Feb 16, 2004
    Messages:
    2,449
    It wasn't all over for the Dems at this point because it never began for them. Alito was an impeccible candidate for the court and the Democrats questioning of him was just political theater, as was the outbreak from Alito's wife.
     
  8. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    Why was his wife at the hearings?

    What did they ask that made her cry?
     
  9. bigbore442001

    bigbore442001 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    103
    Location:
    New England
    My Dad told me that the esteemed senator from the Bay State got on his high horse and was firmly put into his place by another senator in charge of things. Needless to say that wasn't on any station in the Boston or Providence area. It was on FOX.

    It is a shame that such hypocrites are placed in a position of some sort of moral authority.
     
  10. IndianaDean

    IndianaDean Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2004
    Messages:
    541
    The Bradys hate him, Feinstein hates him? I'm liking Alito more and more.
     
  11. JG

    JG Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    213
    Location:
    NY
    The DU is po'd about this......

    Good, hopefully they'll vote the b*tch out of office.
     
  12. papaone

    papaone Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2003
    Messages:
    89
    Location:
    Arkansas
    Sheesh

    Kennedy speaking with moral authority?:cuss:
     
  13. Dannyboy

    Dannyboy Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    867
    Location:
    South Jersey
    They weren't asking him questions so much making statements implying that he was a racist, misogynist, totalitarian, etc. As if the "little guy" is always supposed to win in court against the government or Big Business.
     
  14. RealGun

    RealGun Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    6,937
    Location:
    Upstate SC
    It was right after Lindsay Graham (R-SC, my guy) asked Alito if he was a "closet bigot". If I recall correctly, Alito said "I am not any kind of bigot". Graham repsonded "Of course you aren't. I am sorry you had to be subjected to such a process" or something like that. Alito's wife bolted at that point.
     
  15. Biker

    Biker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Messages:
    6,085
    Location:
    Idaho
    From what I saw, Alito couldn't have conducted himself any better.
    Biker
     
  16. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    I still don't understand why she cried. Nominees to high offices get asked hard questions. Why did he bring his wife to his job interview?
     
  17. gamachinist

    gamachinist Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2003
    Messages:
    284
    Location:
    Locust Grove GA
  18. Biker

    Biker Member

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2005
    Messages:
    6,085
    Location:
    Idaho
    Part of the game, Friend, part of the game.
    Biker
     
  19. RealGun

    RealGun Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    6,937
    Location:
    Upstate SC
    The whole family was there, as is customary. It is supposed to be a special occasion, with the Committee conducting the hearing as a "dignified process". Of course, that doesn't account for Kennedy's involvement, and Schumer thinking he is still a prosecutor. Biden too is an ex-prosecutor.

    There may be a certain strategy to having the family there, hoping that the Senators will tone it down a notch. That didn't seem to work very well.
     
  20. txgho1911

    txgho1911 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2004
    Messages:
    973
    Location:
    Indiana;
    All they could do.

    The last nominee was shot down to easily. The dems messed up letting her get out of the nomination.
    Alito was strong on all sides with a writen history they could question him on. He has an answer for everything. His history over RKBA is not around the 2nd. I believe he has habitualy avoided 2nd Amendment cases or relied on 2nd on cases waiting for the right SCOTUS makeup. SCOTUS may not be ready for restoration of the Const yet.
    He may still be on the other side of all this as well.
     
  21. Lone_Gunman

    Lone_Gunman Member

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    8,056
    Location:
    United Socialist States of Obama
    I did not realize family members were usually at these hearings. That seems like a bad idea. I think the Senators need to scrutinize the candidate in whatever way they want to, and not have to worry about making someone's overly sensitive wife cry. This is the Senate's one chance to regulate the Supreme Court, and I don't think they need to tone anything down just to prevent the family from getting upset.

    If Alito has been married to her for a while, he should have had some idea how she might react to ugly questions, and just told her to stay home, or refused to accept the nomination. These hearings are not the only time Alito will be criticized.
     
  22. antsi

    antsi Member

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2002
    Messages:
    1,398
    This has nothing to do with how much she objects to Alito's judicial philosophy or his positions on issues. It has everything to do with what Feinstein thinks she can pull off, and what's best for her own political chances.

    She wouldn't filibuster the Devil himself, if she thought filibustering him was a bad political move or if she thought it would hurt her agenda.

    Conversely, she'd filibuster her own grandmother if she thought it was a good political move, or if she thought it would advance her agenda.
     
  23. Standing Wolf

    Standing Wolf Member in memoriam

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2002
    Messages:
    24,041
    Location:
    Idahohoho, the jolliest state
    Please pause a moment to ask yourself this question: are we showing enough respect to the Hero of Chappaquiddick?

    Thank you.
     
  24. Art Eatman

    Art Eatman Administrator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2002
    Messages:
    42,982
    Location:
    Terlingua, TX; Thomasville,GA
    This is the sort of subjective stuff that really works better at APS.

    Art
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page