Amazing CZ Accuracy

Status
Not open for further replies.

schmeky

Member
Joined
Mar 17, 2006
Messages
2,194
Location
West Monroe, Louisiana
Posting my first outing with my new Pre-B, CZ 75. The only other centerfire auto I have that shoots like this CZ is my early model .45 Kimber.

I am amazed at what this reasonably priced 9mm can do right out of the box.

I now have a 9mm I prefer over my 1st generation Glock 17. The CZ has lower recoil, better ergonomics, and better accuracy. This is 10 rounds in one hole.

This is a keeper.
 

Attachments

  • HPIM0186 resixe.JPG
    HPIM0186 resixe.JPG
    76.5 KB · Views: 300
Up until a couple of weeks ago, my most accurate CZ was the CZ 75B in .40 caliber. It would consistently outshoot it's 9mm brother. But all that has changed now with the CZ SP-01 Tactical. The grip of the SP-01 feels much nicer in my hand and the heft of the gun lends to it's accuracy.

I keep my eyes out for a pre-B all the time, but this SP-01 more than makes up for the gap in my CZ collection.

--
Mike
 
Great groups! :cool:

Looks fantastic, what range were you shooting from? I'm guessing 75ft as that is what the target indicates. I'm just wondering.
 
I love my 75B and you can't even buy them very easily anymore in The People's Republic of Massachusetts!!!:fire:
 
I'd like to read a member's review of the CZ-97 and if possible, post pics of the glossy blue version they make. This looks like a well made pistol and CZ's reliability is legendary.
 
USP4me

The 97 is a great pistol, a little on the chunky side, accurate, relatively mild recoil(to me) and only reliable with ball ammo.

Somebody probably Walt will come on here and say I'm bashing cz again but it was our experience that the 97b did not like hollow points too much at all and totally hated winchester silvertips which it would fail to feed about 25% or the time or better.

I think this is ok as the .45 is a big fat bullet anyways. Bottom line: I would buy one but the grip is a tiny bit fat to me.

HTH
 
I've wanted one of those for some time now. Thanks for posting that pic; that's nice shooting. I'll probably go out and buy one real soon before their prices start to go up due to the ever-increasing popularity of these pistols.
 
I just had the magazine brake in mine changed over to the model that allows for your mags to drop free. Put a hundred rounds of WWB to check for function. Like always it was perfect. One of the guys at the range commented that it was a "low end gun". I usually am shooting Sigs, H&K, and so on. I told him only in price, not performance. His daughter was with him. After about fifty rounds his daughter noted I was getting some pretty impressive groups with it. He grudgingly said yeah with some other comments. Nice guy, good shooter. just likes high end guns. So do I. Rather they are expensive or not. The CZ is truly classic firearm.
 
The indoor range I shot at on 4-14-06 had new Glocks, Sigs, HK's, CZ's etc., in the display case. They had a couple new 75B's in .40S&W & 9mm.

The price tag was $544.00

The average Joe off the street will probably wind up paying these prices. I predict in the next 2-3 years, CZ's will be a best price of $450-$500.00. Everything else will be higher as well, which means the CZ will still be a bargain.

I would love to own a Sig, but from what I have read on this forum, I don't believe they are any more accurate than a CZ. They are both fine guns, one just costs a lot more than the other.
 
One of the guys at the range commented that it was a "low end gun".
I'll take low end and cheap over low end and overpriced any day.
 
raveneap,

Well made is an understatement. My CZ feels like a chunk of machined billet. The slide fits tight and the gun feels solid in my grip.

The fact that mine shoots one hole groups is an enourmous confidence boost, as well as it being 100% reliable at this point.

So would I pay nearly double the present CZ price for a Sig? And to compare a pistol nearly half the price of a Sig is near blasphemy in the first place. Sig's are great, but a CZ at current prices, is fantastic.
 
I've got a CZ75B. Great gun!

This week, I'm ordering a really old CZ, a CZ 52. J&G Sales just got a batch in this week and will have them available on their site for sale end of this week! I can't wait!
 
I love the CZ75, the only gun I've ever even come as close to shooting as well is a Hi Power.

21-25 feet.....28 rounds.
 

Attachments

  • Hi-Power SFS Blue 21ft.JPG
    Hi-Power SFS Blue 21ft.JPG
    247.5 KB · Views: 41
Ummm, what's the difference between the CZ-75 and the CZ-75B?

From CZ Forums' FAQ:

In 1995, the Type B models were introduced. These are also called the “B series,” etc. Both the CZ 75B and CZ 85B replaced the earlier models. Type Bs have the firing pin block safety, a square trigger guard, slightly different external controls, and a rounded hammer.

;)

My CZ 75b Tactical outshoots my Sig 226 ST and my Beretta Elite II. True, it's not as refined overall as the latter two, but you can't tell from the groups they shoot.
 
Bevr wrote:

Somebody probably Walt will come on here and say I'm bashing cz again but it was our experience that the 97b did not like hollow points too much at all and totally hated winchester silvertips which it would fail to feed about 25% or the time or better.
Nope.

Some (but not all) 97Bs have had problems with hollow-points. Its generally remedied by polishing the feed ramp -- but not always. CZ owners in the U.S. (about the only place where HPs are routinely available) shouldn't have to deal with this issue, but do -- and most of them resolve it.

Several members on the CZ Forum sent their guns back to CZ, where they recontoured the feed ramp. Other members have done it themselves.

Still other members feel that part of the problem may be mag-related, as the mag sets lower in the grip than is optimal. Some of these folks have modified the mag catch to make the mag set higher, and claim feeding improvements, as a result. (Most who made these changes originally did so to get rid of what they felt was an unattractive gap between the base of the grip and the mag base.) I don't know whether the mag release fix is really a fix; its not a simple one. I do think we'll see some after-market mag releases in the future, for both functional and cosmetic reasons.

I had a 97B, but never tried HPs in it-- as I found the grip too big for me. I traded it away. Mine was very accurate and had a pretty good trigger, out of the box.

The 97B may be the most accurate of the CZs, in the lower price ranges. The pricier IPSC guns are a whole different story - but they cost a lot more being, in effect, hand-fit semi-custom guns.
 
Lets see, am I a fair judge of CZs? I own a CZ75, CZ75B, CZ75 PCR, CZ75 Compact, CZ40B, and a Rami 40 S&W. I am sure CZs were the best kept secret out there until the prices went up. Are CZs that amazingly accurate? Not in my hands; I do better with a Walther P88, Browning BDM, or BHP but that may just be me. I respect CZs and I shoot them, but there are more accurate pistols in my hands. Regards, Richard :D
 
Shamus, a friend owned a stock Glock 17 that would shoot with the best 9mms I have shot, I am talking P88s and Sigs etc. I guess it all depends on the particular pistol in a particular person's hands. Regards, Richard :D
 
Howdy Pards:

I've got 7 of these boogers. The modern ones (40P; 75B; 83; & 97B) are a bunch more accurate than any other semi autos I've ever owned or shot. My oldies but goodies (3 CZ 52's) aren't that good in my hands...but oh what a hoot ta shoot!!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.