and how many American gun owners do you think WILL swallow this rubbish??

Status
Not open for further replies.

alan

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
2,601
Location
sowest pa.
Posters Question:

While CENTRALIZED STORAGE MIGHT have a nice ring in the ears of some, readers should consider the following. Being a GOOD CITIZEN, hale fellow, well met and so on, you go along with this idea. Comes a weekend hunting trip or a match, and you approach this CENTRALIZED DEPOT, intent on for a short time, recovering YOUR GOODS. So sorry sir, you hear, it seems that The
Chief Clerk, or whomever it might be that is The Keeper of The Keys has gone off on a lengthy trip, vacation, maternity leave, hospitalization, the possibilities are really endless, and sad to note, only he, she or they had, take your pick, the keys or combination. Check back with us in a few months, at which time, WE MIGHT have more information for you. Given that situation, not all that far out you know, does this idea of CENTRALIZED STORAGE, of course, all for your own good, still have that pleasant ring to it. Read on people, read on.

MEDIA RELEASE: Toronto Mayor says No Reason to Have Guns at Home

STANLEY NOTE: Coming to America, incrementally... Americans will fall for it as well. Sad... The evil that is moving us towards the One World Government and the destruction of individual rights is an abomination. Most folks who are politically correct are welcoming this. Might as well just step into the fire.

----- Forwarded message from [email protected] -----
Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 08:27:20 -0000
Subject: Toronto Mayor says No Reason to Have Guns at Home
To: [email protected]

Dear Rick,

I came across this article about guns, which I think you may want to read, and possibly post as an Opinion Release or Media Release.

Sincerely,
Deborah Reid
http://www.angelfire.com/stars4/wisdomforcourts
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/wisepeople

--- In [email protected], "D. Reid" <deborahgailreid@y...>
wrote:
James Cowan
Toronto Mayor: No Reason to Have Guns at Home
Fri Aug 19, 2005 12:57am

Toronto Mayor: No Reason to Have Guns at Home

National Post | August 17 2005
By James Cowan

Gun owners in Toronto may soon be prohibited from keeping their
firearms at home even if they are properly licensed and registered, Mayor David Miller said yesterday.

"There's no reason to own a gun in Toronto -- collector or not. If
you are a collector and you have a permit, the guns need to be stored in a way that they can't be stolen. And perhaps a centralized facility of some kind could accomplish that goal," Mr. Miller told the National Post. "The law requires gun owners to have proper storage, but obviously not everyone adheres to that."

Following a spate of shootings in Toronto, the Mayor has asked city lawyers and the police to determine whether the municipality has the "legal ability" to require individuals to store their weapons at a secure facility such as a gun club.

"It's a very serious issue and I don't have all the answers to it,
but I've spoken to the [Police] Chief as well as our own legal
department to see what we can do," Mr. Miller said.

The Mayor has repeatedly blamed lax gun laws in the United States for some of Toronto's violence, saying half of the firearms in the city originated in the United States.

While pressing the federal government to stem the smuggling of guns across the border, Mr. Miller said steps must also be taken steps to address domestic gun problems.

"I understand there was one theft from a collector two years ago,
where some of the guns were recovered after being used in murders in Toronto," he said.

Police have also speculated a theft in June of 46 handguns, along
with three rifles and ammunition, from a collector in Port Hope, 100 kilometres east of the city, has contributed to the recent increase in shootings.

Mr. Miller noted several U.S. cities such as Chicago have passed
ordinances restricting handgun ownership. But legal gun owners argue the new rules would only make life simpler for criminals.

"It would just put all the firearms in one place so they could all be
stolen at one time," said Eric Greer of the Ontario Arms Collectors
Association. "That would be a wonderful thing."

Mr. Greer added the Mayor's proposal would not prevent criminals from acquiring weapons, noting Canada enacted its first handgun registry in 1934.

"It hasn't made one iota of difference. And the reason is the people that registered their handguns don't commit the crimes. The people who commit crimes don't register their guns. It's as simple as that," he said.

Other gun owners said they are tired of being conflated with
murderers and thieves.

"There are legal gun owners all over Ontario who don't go around
brandishing their guns, who go through the whole rigamarole to get licensed properly," said Bill, a member of the Maple Leaf Revolver Club, who asked his last name not be used citing safety
concerns. "The Mayor's not thinking properly."

He added most gun owners would support tough sentences for
individuals caught using firearms to commit a crime.

"At most of the clubs, you will hear people say, 'Arrest the guy,
look at the law and if the law says to throw him away for five years or 10 years, do it,' " the gun owner said.

Mr. Miller agreed the courts must be more stringent, noting
individuals caught with weapons currently are routinely released on bail.

"If somebody has a gun, that's illegal, whether or not they've shot
it should be irrelevant. They should be treated like they've shot it
and tried to kill somebody," he said. "So when they come to court,
they shouldn't get out. They should be kept in court until they're
tried.


Source:

http://disc.server.com/discussion.cgi?
id=192635;article=7953;show_parent=1
 
Saw this before - it is a simple step to collect the firearms, lock them away, and forever deny the owners access, thus opening the door for tryanny, brutality, and subjegation, just as happened with EVERY PEOPLE SLAUGHTERED BY THEIR OWN GOVERNMENT. Is Canada going to kill thousands of thier own people? Hmm, in the 1930s, the Weimar Republic was considered a modern, progressive government, and Germany a wonderful place to live....Doesn't say it's going to happen, but actions like this make it more likely...
 
My bet is zero US gun owners will go for it

Even the Over & Under - $20,000 plus - custom Italian Trap and Skeet boys won't be in favor of having the local mayor and CLEO have the keys to their toys.

They don't mind banning "assault" rifles or handguns because they don't own them; not sporting don't 'ya know. But this kind of thing would strike at the heart of having something to show off to the boys at the club.
 
Well first, they'd have to get all the firearms to the CENTRALIZED STORAGE DEPOT.

Good luck with that.
 
No Reason to Have Guns at Home
What mouth-breathing electorate would let him get away with such a disconnection from reality? Oh, Toronto! Nevermind.

What numbskull wants their guns to get banged-up, rusted and stolen in govt. storage? I guess now that I think of it, the government is pretty stinkin good at everything else they try.
 
Back in 1983 I was in one of thier hospitals in Montreal and they couldn't even pay the doctors to come in on Monday. All they have do is hire a few guys that never show up for work.
 
Hmm, in the 1930s, the Weimar Republic was considered a modern, progressive government, and Germany a wonderful place to live....Doesn't say it's going to happen, but actions like this make it more likely...
Not by definition "more likely" - but certainly (much) more easily accomplished if that's where they wanted to go with it.
 
and how many American gun owners do you think WILL swallow this rubbish??
Probably more than we'd want to believe. I'd like to think that all but a few delusional "useful idiots" would refuse, but look how many people voted for Lurch, at least in part becuase of his gun pose photo ops. Between those idiots, the truly uninformed swayed by the hard core bigots, and the hard core gun bigots themselves it may be possible for them to push through that kind of restriction in certain areas.
 
I don't think too many gun owners would go for that at all. Regaurdless of all other factors, not many people are keen on the idea of letting any one else care for any kind of valuables. Guns represent a significant chunk of change, weather the cheapest saturday night special or the nicest custom gun.
 
I have a friend who keeps trying to convince me that I should be open to this kind of idea, and of course that it would only be a "minor inconvenience" for me. Obviously he wouldn't care to have the Government force him to store his stuff in a facility, but whatever.
 
Store them in a central location? Under control of the state?

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!! ...sigh...

ghoS 'ej tlhap chaH!!!
I predict 99.999 percent of american gun owners will not fall for this horsecrap.
I wish I had your optimism beerslurpy, though I do think it would be a majority who'd not stand for such foolishness.
 
Those of us who frequent freedom oriented boards wonder out loud how we can have it so right and everyone else has it so wrong. We are the defenders of freedom against the fascist hordes. We know all things constitutional. Yada, yada, yada. :p

The 'Murican people ain't stoopid. Detached, aloof, preoccupied maybe. But not stoopid. I suspect an storage law (which I think is next in any one of 6 special states) is next. Compliance will minimal because average 'Muricans see it for what it is.
 
Access issue

They're welcome to keep most of mine in central lockup as long as I get to keep a rifle and shotgun to guarantee my access to the others. No deal? Then I'll keep them all, thank you.
 
Still better than Iraqis, who will not be able to even own a gun without government permission (licensing), sort of like getting a handgun license in New York City or DC. Good luck.
 
...the guns need to be stored in a way that they can't be stolen.

How much do you wish to wager on that, Mayor Miller ? ? ?

Ask the Arkansas State Police about "Central Storage". Sometime in the late 80's, the ASP 'Central Storage Evidence Locker' got cleaned out...and I mean cleaned out. A huge number of drug cases, armed robbery & murder, DWI/DUI etc. had to be thrown out of court because evidence was missing.

(I was living under the regime of Guv. Slick Willie back then...Moved to SC to get away, and looky looky..he became the Prez.)
 
They keep trying this stuff in Canuckastan. The last registration try cost them over a billion bucks, and only a small fraction of 20 million gun owners actually registered some of their weapons.

The controversial gun control program — licensing owners and registering guns — was originally projected to have a net cost of $2 million, but after 10 years in the works, it surpassed the $1-billion mark last year. Critics have condemned it for years, saying it lacks both accountability and effectiveness.

One former Mountie called the registry "totally useless" because criminals don't register their guns.

"They've wasted $2 billion on what should have gone to front-line policing," said Dennis Young, parliamentary assistant to Saskatchewan Conservative MP Garry Breitkreuz, a gun-registry critic.

"They've targeted law-abiding citizens instead of the 176,000 people (with court convictions) who have been prohibited from owning guns."


- Toronto Star
 
They're welcome to keep most of mine in central lockup as long as I get to keep a rifle and shotgun to guarantee my access to the others. No deal? Then I'll keep them all, thank you.

1911 guy,
So you are saying you are willing to let "them" take your property and store it for you, as long as "they" give you permission to keep just enough to defend yourself?

No Offense, but you need to think this through. There is no compromise on this issue. Either you hand over everything or you don't. Either we have a 2nd Amendment or we don't. We are suppose to have a Bill of Rights that says this issue should not even be up for debate.

I am not worried about this type of thing happening in this country. It is too obvious a ploy. Not even the "hunters only" crowd would be willing to hand over their prized bolt action to be stored by the government. Can you imagine the reaction if hunters went to get their rifles or shotguns for hunting season and the office is closed? LOL...yeah, that would be a mess.

It is still confiscation..... period
 
I am pretty sure american gun owners will swallow this rubbish.

After all, american gold owners swallowed confiscation of gold in 1933.
American businessmen swallowed price controls and production quotas in 1930s.
American workers and employers swallowed wage controls in 1971.

Americans can swallow pretty much anything. Can't we?

miko
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top