geekWithA.45
Moderator Emeritus
ANGER
The explanation of the Second Amendment given by the National Constitutions website breathes life into a lie.
I quote in full:
---------------------------------------------------------
As explained in The Words We Live By by Linda Monk:
The American Revolution was fought by minutemen, ready with their guns at a moment’s notice. Early Americans believed that a militia, composed of citizen-soldiers, was a better safeguard of their liberties than a standing or permanent army. Today the militia consists of the National Guard, drilling in state units. Does the Second Amendment protect only the right of the states to have militias, or does it give individuals a right to bear arms for self-defense as well as national defense? That question is at the heart of the debate over the Second Amendment and gun control.
---------------------------------------------------------
Lie 1) Today the militia consists of the National Guard.
Refutation: The Militia IS NOT THE NATIONAL GUARD, neither in theory nor in law.
Lie 2) Does it give.....
Refutation: The Constitution does not GRANT any rights, it PROTECTS them. The rights it protects are inherent and unalienable
Lie 3) Does the Second Amendment protect only the right of the states to have militias, or does it give individuals a right to bear arms for self-defense as well as national defense? That question is at the heart of the debate over the Second Amendment and gun control.
Refutation: The "debate" itself is false. There is no debate. Law, History, and First Principles are absolutely clear: The INDIVIDUAL is the entity endowed with this right.
I AM PISSED BEYOND BELIEF
That this, our national center of education concerning the consitution has pandered to this utter, outright revisionist bull????., and completely misses some elementary points about the nature of our rights, and the origins of governments powers.
The explanation of the Second Amendment given by the National Constitutions website breathes life into a lie.
I quote in full:
---------------------------------------------------------
As explained in The Words We Live By by Linda Monk:
The American Revolution was fought by minutemen, ready with their guns at a moment’s notice. Early Americans believed that a militia, composed of citizen-soldiers, was a better safeguard of their liberties than a standing or permanent army. Today the militia consists of the National Guard, drilling in state units. Does the Second Amendment protect only the right of the states to have militias, or does it give individuals a right to bear arms for self-defense as well as national defense? That question is at the heart of the debate over the Second Amendment and gun control.
---------------------------------------------------------
Lie 1) Today the militia consists of the National Guard.
Refutation: The Militia IS NOT THE NATIONAL GUARD, neither in theory nor in law.
Lie 2) Does it give.....
Refutation: The Constitution does not GRANT any rights, it PROTECTS them. The rights it protects are inherent and unalienable
Lie 3) Does the Second Amendment protect only the right of the states to have militias, or does it give individuals a right to bear arms for self-defense as well as national defense? That question is at the heart of the debate over the Second Amendment and gun control.
Refutation: The "debate" itself is false. There is no debate. Law, History, and First Principles are absolutely clear: The INDIVIDUAL is the entity endowed with this right.
I AM PISSED BEYOND BELIEF
That this, our national center of education concerning the consitution has pandered to this utter, outright revisionist bull????., and completely misses some elementary points about the nature of our rights, and the origins of governments powers.