Read more about it here. http://www.sigsauerguns.com/product-highlights/sig-sauer-sig556-762x39/
Like it or not it beats the heck out of the 5.56NATO/.223Rem. As far as factory cartridges, the Hornady V-max load should perform nicely, and Ulyanovsk 8M3 works fairly well on the cheap (if you can find any), as does Brown Bear (Barnaul) heavy SP.Is there a new 7.62x39 round out that is hard hitting? Something better than the mediocre-to-poor performing 7.62x39 that's out there in the real world?
HorseSoldier said:Is there a new 7.62x39 round out that is hard hitting?
An Anti-Reliability mag adapter...why would they ever do that? You have to admit the 7.62x39mm AR magazine variant has a history that is spotted at best.And it'll be more interesting to see if they offer an AR mag adapter for it.
An Anti-Reliability mag adapter...why would they ever do that? You have to admit the 7.62x39mm AR magazine variant has a history that is spotted at best.
It's not new, but it definitely hits harder than 5.56
Pretty much, and you are right; they just aren't designed for that case...5.56NATO, et al, work just fine.deadduck357 said:"spotted" come-on your being modest, they are JUNK...
I don't get paid to shoot at people, so i'll not argue that case, but i'd be wary of using a .223Rem./5.56NATO for deer/hog, and have no objection to using the 7.62x39mm (with properly constructed bullets). That is my basis for comparison, others may differ.HorseSoldier said:That hasn't really been my experience in the real world, but to each their own.
Tell that to the Soviets, they ditched 7.62x39 in favor of a 5.56 twin, the 5.45 back in the 70s. The Chinese have done the same thing with the 5.8. Ok, maybe ditched is the wrong word, maybe "taken out of front line servce".Like it or not it beats the heck out of the 5.56NATO/.223Rem.
No argument thereThe 7.62x39 round is very sound. Nothing wrong with its accuracy or hitting power
That hasn't really been my experience in the real world, but to each their own.
BTW, 7.62x39 is only equivalent to 30-30 if you are talking about light, flat point bullets and ranges over 150 yards or so where the superior BC of the 7.62 spitzer starts to be an advantage.
Didn't say that it couldn't be done, just not my choice for the task.GunTech said:My son had now taken 3 white tail with three shots from a 223 (one with a Mini-14 and two with an AR). 64gn soft points work just fine, and there is no substitute for shot placement.
No argument here, it is not as powerful as the .30-30Win., nor does it have the penetrating capability (unless using non-expanding ammunition).BTW, 7.62x39 is only equivalent to 30-30 if you are talking about light, flat point bullets and ranges over 150 yards or so where the superior BC of the 7.62 spitzer starts to be an advantage.
The USSR adopted the 5.45x39.5mm for lighter weight (more cartridges for the same combat load), as well as better controllability and accuracy. Power had nothing to do with it. The 7.62x39mm is unquestionably the more powerful cartridge, and the 5.45x39.5mm is not a ballistic twin of the 5.56NATO, it is in every way (save for bullet design) inferior to the 5.56.W L Johnson said:Tell that to the Soviets, they ditched 7.62x39 in favor of a 5.56 twin, the 5.45 back in the 70s. The Chinese have done the same thing with the 5.8. Ok, maybe ditched is the wrong word, maybe "taken out of front line servce".
That hasn't really been my experience in the real world, but to each their own.
I highly doubt that they will make the move away from the .223Rem./5.56NATO to anything else, any time soon.Is there really a police or military market for such a thing?