Another gun range closed

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Aug 10, 2004
Messages
1,541
HELENA, Mont. (AP) - Erosion by wind and water is a big part of the story at Makoshika State Park, a place of badlands and dinosaur fossils, bobcats and bluebirds. Now some people who enjoy firing guns at a range there fear erosion of what they have come to view as an entitlement.

The state parks agency plans to eliminate a decades-old rifle range at Makoshika, a rolling expanse of peculiar sandstone formations in eastern Montana. The 11,500-acre park gets about 54,000 visits a year, and is especially popular among gun enthusiasts in Glendive, about a quarter-mile from the rifle range and its plywood targets.

"Things have changed," said Tom Reilly, an assistant administrator in the Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks. "Now we have a visitor center on one side and a public campground on the other."

Shooting may disturb people who "come from New Jersey to camp and wake up to gunfire," he said "We may be used to that, living here, but others may not be."

The state agency's new 10-year management plan for Makoshika calls for moving the shooting range, but no new site has been selected.

That concerns Glendive shooters such as Ernest Huether, who sells and repairs guns. He worries the alternative to the state range will be a private one, with fees and a less convenient location.

Another shooter, Henry Mischel of the Dawson County Rod & Gun Club, said state planners should keep in mind that guns are a traditional part of life in Montana.

His response to concerns about visitors: "I don't like the sound of sirens when I go to a big city, but I have to deal with it."

Mischel said the rifle range has existed at least for the 50 years he has lived in Glendive. On a busy day, the range - passed by visitors heading to the park's interior - draws dozens of shooters carrying handguns and rifles.

The new Makoshika plan, prepared after study of recommendations from a public advisory group, was approved in late 2005 by Jeff Hagener, director of Fish, Wildlife and Parks.

The state commission overseeing the agency will take up an appeal Monday by John N. Haas of Glendive, who has challenged removal of the range. Eliminating it might be OK were there a suitable replacement, but one has not been found, Haas said.

"I'm not sure that a suitable replacement site exists - it depends on what is defined as suitable," he wrote in the appeal. And without an alternative site, he said, "future development within the park cannot successfully be planned around a faulty assumption that the range will be moved."

There have been no reports of accidents or close calls associated with the range, but the plan says "the possibility of a misfire" into a populated area cannot be ignored.

"People wander all over," said Jim Swanson of the park advocacy group Friends of Makoshika. "They can drop over a hill and, boom, they're right in a rifle range."

http://www.modbee.com/24hour/nation/story/3233266p-11974765c.html
 
Shooting may disturb people who "come from New Jersey to camp and wake up to gunfire," he said "We may be used to that, living here, but others may not be."

The poor babies...

Why is it that the people who want to screw up an area the most always call themselves "Friends of..."?

There have been no accidents or close calls BUT THERE MIGHT BE ONE DAY!!!

Pansyism is spreading to the heartland:cuss:
 
So instead of gunfire the sounds should be replaced with horns honking and airliners landing just to give them a taste of home. :barf:


A similar thing is happening here in Oregon too. We have Californians moving up in hords and trying to make it like where they used to live, including political atmosphere. I'm already getting tired of it and ready to move.
 
Like Ive said before, people will move to enjoy the country and then complain about the cows.
If the pro-gun plan is just to keep moving to more accepting areas, we'll all get stuck in alaska before long....and then some "friends of preserving ice" society will move in >_<
 
Is the gun range producing revenue? I know the campers probably have to pay a fee. If the range does not produce cash I am willing to bet that is the real issue. Alot of outdoor gun ranges are also being forced out by "noise pollution" laws. They use these laws to get rid of the ranges so they can move in some cash cow business. Here locally they closed a range right down from my house and then built an evil empire (wal-mart) store.
 
This range is about 1.5 hrs South of where I live. I have been there, and it's beautiful Badlands country, as it is where I live. They are looking for an alternative location, as the article say's. The people from NJ waking up to gun fire, just cracked me up. This is Montana for gods sake.

The idiots that want to do this work for the state, and are in Helena. We have to drive down there every now and then, and do a little Butt kicking. This will get taken care of!
 
Shooting may disturb people who "come from New Jersey to camp and wake up to gunfire," he said "We may be used to that, living here, but others may not be."

There's probably a great deal more shooting done in New Jersey than Montana; furthermore, shooting two-legged game in Montana is illegal.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top