Wow, I bet you got an "A" from your professor you brainwashed little twit. Did you never take a course in logic? Your argument has so many holes I could drive a truck through. Here are a few:
1) Our weak laws contribute to Mexican "gun violence". Mexico has stronger laws than we do. How come they don't have lower violence then? What makes you think that if we pass strong laws, that we won't see an influx of Mexican guns? It is a myth that US guns are flooding into Mexico to fuel the drug war. Some say 90% of them are American. That's 90% of the ones that can be traced, which is probably about 15% of the total. Black market guns from central & south America are far cheaper and come already fully automatic.
2) UK has lower incidence of "gun violence". First it makes no sense to limit your argument to "gun violence." You should look at all violent crime. The UK has always been far lower than the US in violent crime so this is not an apt comparison. In fact, their rate of violent crime went UP after they confiscated all the guns. Take a look at the rate of stabbings and assaults after the gun ban.
3) "The purpose of a gun is violence." Sometimes violence is necessary, such as when you are attacked. Every resident of Kennesaw, GA is required to own a gun. Their level of violence is very low.
4) What would you do if Bush had declared he's staying in office, despite Obama's election? He says, screw the constitution, Obama's an illegal alien, I'm president for life. Pelosi and Reid get arrested and jailed. Democrats are denied entry to the House chamber. Sound like time for a revolution? Do you think you can overthrow an oppressive illegal regime with pepper spray?